Association of Intrinsic Capacity with Frailty, Physical Fitness and Adverse Health Outcomes in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.

BACKGROUND: Intrinsic capacity (IC) and frailty are complementary in advancing disability prevention through maintaining functionality. OBJECTIVES: We examined the relationship between IC and frailty status at baseline and 1-year, and evaluated if IC decline predicts frailty onset among robust older adults. The secondary objectives investigated associations between IC, physical fitness and health-related outcomes. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Community-based assessments. PARTICIPANTS: Older adults aged>55 years, who were independent in ambulation (walking aids permitted). MEASUREMENTS: 5 domains of IC were assessed at baseline: locomotion (Short Physical Performance Battery, 6-minute walk test), vitality (nutritional status, muscle mass), sensory (self-reported hearing and vision), cognition (self-reported memory, age- and education adjusted cognitive performance), psychological (Geriatric Depression Scale-15, self-reported anxiety/ depression). Composite IC (0-10) was calculated, with higher scores representing greater IC. Frailty status was based on modified Fried criteria, with frailty progression defined as incremental Fried score at 1-year. RESULTS: 809 participants (67.6+6.8 years) had complete data for all 5 IC domains. 489 (60.4%) participants were robust but only 213 (26.3%) had no decline in any IC domain. Pre-frail and frail participants were more likely to exhibit decline in all 5 IC domains (p<0.05), with decremental composite IC [9 (8-9), 8 (6-9), 5.5 (4-7.5), p<0.001] across robust, prefrail and frail. IC was significantly associated with fitness performance, independent of age and gender. Higher composite IC reduced risk for frailty progression (OR=0.62, 95% CI 0.48-0.80), and reduced frailty onset among robust older adults (OR=0.53, 95% CI 0.37-0.77), independent of age, comorbidities and social vulnerability. Participants with higher IC were less likely to experience health deterioration (OR=0.70, 95% CI 0.58-0.83), falls (OR=0.76, 95% CI 0.65-0.90) and functional decline (OR=0.64, 95% CI 0.50-0.83) at 1-year. CONCLUSION: Declining IC may present before frailty becomes clinically manifest, increasing risk for poor outcomes. Monitoring of IC domains potentially facilitates personalized interventions to avoid progressive frailty.

A Non-Controlled Study of a Multi-Factorial Exercise and Nutritional Intervention to Improve Functional Performance and Prevent Frailty Progression in Community-Dwelling Pre-Frail Older Adults.

Background: Preventing frailty is important to avoid adverse health outcomes. Intervention studies have largely focused on frail elderly, although the intermediate pre-frail state may be more amenable to improvement. Objectives: This study aims to assess how physical performance may change among pre-frail elderly enrolled in a pragmatic non-controlled exercise and nutritional intervention programme. Methods: This is a non-controlled study involving a 4-month exercise and nutritional intervention for community dwelling pre-frail older adults. Pre-frailty was defined as the presence of 1 or 2 positive responses on the FRAIL questionnaire, or evidence of weak grip strength (<26kg for males; <18kg for females) or slow gait speed (<0.8m/s) amongst participants who were asymptomatic on FRAIL. Physical performance in flexibility, grip and lower limb strength, endurance, balance, and Short Physical Performance Battery were measured at 3 time-points: baseline, 3-month from recruitment (without intervention), and immediate post-intervention. Repeated measures mixed model analysis was performed to compare physical performance measures across the 3 time-points. Results: 94 pre-frail participants were eligible for intervention, of whom 59 (mean age = 70.9±7.2 years) were ready for the post-intervention review. 21 (35.6%) transitioned to robust phenotype while 32 (54.2%) remained as pre-frail. Significant improvement post-intervention was observed in lower limb strength and power, evident on reduction in time taken for 5 sit-to-stand repetitions (0.46±0.20s, p=0.03). There was no significant change to the other physical performance measures examined. Conclusion: We observed reversibility of pre-frailty, and the benefit of multi-component intervention in improving physical performance of pre-frail older adults. The findings in this non-controlled study will need to be corroborated with future controlled trials.

Frailty Assessment in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Comparison of 3 Diagnostic Instruments.

OBJECTIVES: Compare the diagnostic performance of FRAIL against Fried Phenotype and Frailty Index (FI), and identify clinical factors associated with pre-frailty/frailty. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis. SETTING: Community-based screenings in Senior Activity Centres, Residents' Corners and Community Centres in northeast Singapore. PARTICIPANTS: 517 community dwelling participants aged >55 years and ambulant independently (with/ without walking aids) were included in this study. Residents of sheltered or nursing homes, and seniors unable to ambulate at least four meters independently were excluded. MEASUREMENTS: The multidomain geriatric screen included assessments for social vulnerability, mood, cognition, sarcopenia and nutrition. Participants completed a battery of physical fitness tests for grip strength, gait speed, lower limb strength and power, flexibility, balance and endurance, with overall physical performance represented by Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). Frailty status was assigned on FRAIL, Fried and 35-item FI. RESULTS: Prevalence of frailty was 1.3% (FRAIL) to 3.1% (FI). Pre-frailty prevalence ranged from 17.0% (FRAIL) to 51.2% (FI). FRAIL demonstrated poor agreement with FI (kappa=0.171, p<0.0001), and Fried (kappa=0.194, p<0.0001). A lower FRAIL cut-off ≥1 yielded significantly improved AUC of 0.70 (95%CI 0.55 to 0.86, p=0.009) against Fried, and 0.71 (95%CI 0.55 to 0.86, p=0.008) against FI. All 3 frailty measures were diagnostic of impaired physical performance on SPPB, with AUCs ranging from 0.69 on FRAIL to 0.77 on Fried (all p values <0.01). Prevalence of low socio-economic status, depression, malnutrition and sarcopenia increased significantly, while fitness measures of gait speed, balance, and endurance declined progressively across robust, pre-frail and frail on all 3 frailty instruments (p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that different frailty instruments may capture over-lapping albeit distinct constructs, and thus may not be used interchangeably. FRAIL has utility for quick screening, and any positive response should trigger further assessment, including evaluation for depression, social vulnerability and malnutrition.

miRNA*: a passenger stranded in RNA-induced silencing complex?

Processing of the pre-microRNA (pre-miRNA) through Dicer1 generates a miRNA duplex, consisting of a miRNA and miRNA* strand (also termed guide strand and passenger strand, respectively). Despite the general consensus that miRNA*s have no regulatory activity, recent publications have provided evidence that the abundance, possible function, and physiological relevance of miRNA*s have been underestimated. This review provides an account of our current understanding of miRNA* origination and activity, mounting evidence for their unique functions and regulatory mechanisms, and examples of specific miRNA*s from the literature.

Functional results in oral cavity reconstruction using reinnervated versus nonreinnervated free fasciocutaneous grafts.

Recent advances in free-tissue transfer have given the otolaryngologist--head and neck surgeon a number of reliable options for reconstruction of the oral cavity following ablative procedures. One recent modification has been the transfer of free reinnervated fasciocutaneous grafts in the hope of enhancing oral rehabilitation following surgery. To assess the efficacy of this modification, a protocol was established to retrospectively evaluate patients that received either reinnervated or non-reinnervated free-tissue transfers. Factors including site, surgical resection, type of tissue transfer, and follow-up period were controlled. Evaluation of free-graft sensory return and quality of life was carried out through physical examination and patient interview. Speech assessment was carried out using standardized tests of intelligibility administered by a speech pathologist. Swallowing assessment was carried out with videocinefluoroscopic and scintigraphic techniques, and the oropharyngeal swallow efficiency was calculated. Sensory return in the reinnervate free grafts was superior; however, there was not statistical difference between groups in the speech and swallowing tests. Quality of life was judged to be good in both groups. Sensory return and functional outcome in intraoral reconstruction after tumour ablation was reviewed and discussed