ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Acute cutaneous graft-versus-host disease (acGVHD) following haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is common but difficult to distinguish from other causes of rash. Plasma elafin has been proposed as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker of skin GVHD. AIM: To evaluate the role of plasma elafin as a biomarker in acGVHD in an Indian population. METHODS: Plasma elafin was evaluated in a prospective study of HSCT recipients, conducted over 2 years, taking measurements at baseline and at onset of skin rash after HSCT. Patients were categorized into those with GVHD rash, those with non-GVHD rash and those with no rash and the three groups were compared. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-one patients with a median age of 16 years (range 1-61 years) and a male predominance (175 : 86 M/F) underwent HSCT during the study period: 56 patients in the GVHD group, 49 in the non-GVHD group and 156 in the no-rash group. The median baseline elafin was similar in all three groups. At the onset of rash, median elafin level was similar between GVHD and non-GVHD rash (34 549 vs. 32 077 pg/mL; P = 0.58) and between GVHD and no rash (34 549 vs. 26 197 pg/mL; P = 0.08). A rise in elafin from baseline was significantly different between GVHD and no rash (P < 0.001) but not between GVHD and non-GVHD rash (P = 0.44). CONCLUSION: The utility of plasma elafin as a biomarker of skin GVHD is very limited. Plasma elafin, although elevated in cutaneous GVHD, is not helpful in distinguishing between GVHD rash and other causes of rash following HSCT.
Subject(s)
Elafin/blood , Graft vs Host Disease/diagnosis , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Biomarkers/blood , Child , Child, Preschool , Diagnosis, Differential , Exanthema/diagnosis , Exanthema/etiology , Female , Graft vs Host Disease/blood , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The skin is the most common organ involved in acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). Because histopathology has limited utility in ruling out clinical mimics of acute skin GvHD, more accurate diagnostic techniques are required. AIM: To evaluate the utility of elafin expression in skin by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for accurate diagnosis of acute skin GvHD. METHODS: Consecutive allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients during a 6-month period who developed rash within the first 100 days post-transplant were recruited. Skin biopsies were taken on the day the rash developed. IHC for epidermal elafin was performed and interpreted by a pathologist blinded to the histopathological diagnosis. Staining of ≥ 50% of epidermis was considered positive. Final diagnosis of the rash was assigned using clinical features supported by histopathology. The accuracy of elafin IHC in predicting the final diagnosis of acute GvHD was evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 23 patients (20 male, 3 female; median age 16 years, range 3-53 years) with 27 episodes of skin rash were recruited. Skin rash post-HSCT occurred at a median of 20 days (range 5-45 days). A diagnosis of GvHD was made in 16 episodes (59.26%) while the remaining 11 episodes (40.74%) were judged to be non-GvHD rash. Elafin IHC was positive in all patients with GvHD. Of the 11 episodes of non-GvHD rash, elafin was negative in 8. Thus, the sensitivity and specificity of elafin IHC for predicting acute skin GvHD was 100% and 75%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Tissue elafin is a useful immunohistochemical marker for acute skin GvHD. However, larger studies are needed to validate these results.
