Cross-Calibration Study of The Stratos And Hologic QDR 4500A Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometers to Assess Bone Mineral Density And Body Composition.

The objective of the study was to assess the agreement between the Stratos (DMS) and QDR 4500A (Hologic) DXAs in determining whole body and regional aBMD, as well as whole body composition. Fifty-five individuals (46 women: 84%) with a mean age of 41 ± 13.0 years (range: 20 to 64) and a mean BMI of 31.9 ± 10 kg/m² (range: 12.2 to 49.5) were consecutively scanned on the same day using the two devices. Predictive equations for areal bone mineral density (aBMD) and whole body composition (WBC) were derived from linear regression of the data. The two DXAs were highly correlated (p<0.001 for all parameters) with a correlation coefficient (r) ranging from 0.89 to 0.99 for aBMD (r=0.89 for whole body, r=0.92 for radius, r=0.95 for femoral neck, r=0.96 for total hip, and r=0.99 for L1-L4). For WBC, the r value was 0.98 for lean tissue mass (LTM) and 1.0 for fat mass (FM). Paired t-tests indicated a statistically significant bias between the two DXAs for the majority of measurements, requiring the determination of specific cross-calibration equations. Compared to QDR 4500A, Stratos underestimated whole body aBMD and LTM and overestimated neck and hip aBMD and whole body FM. Conversely, no significant bias was demonstrated for mean aBMD at L1-L4 and radius. For whole body aBMD and FM, the concordance between the two DXAs was influenced by BMI. Despite a high concordance between the two DXAs, the systematic bias for aBMD and WBC measurements illustrates the need to define cross-calibration equations to compare data across systems.

Comparison of the Discovery A and Stratos DR densitometers for assessing whole-body and regional bone mineral density and body composition.

PURPOSE: The agreement between the Stratos DR and Discovery A densitometers was assessed for measurements of whole-body (WB) and regional fat mass (FM), fat-free soft tissue (FFST) and bone mineral density (BMD). Moreover, the precision of the Stratos DR was also evaluated. METHODS: Fifty participants (35 women, 70%) were measured consecutively, once on the Discovery A and once on the Stratos DR. In a subgroup of participants (n = 29), two successive measurements with the Stratos DR were also performed. RESULTS: FM, FFST and BMD measured with the two devices were highly correlated, with a coefficient of correlation ranging from 0.80 to 0.99. Bland-Altman analyses indicated significant bias between the two devices for all measurements. Thus, compared to the Discovery A, the Stratos DR underestimated WB BMD and WB and regional FM and FFST, with the exception of trunk FM and visceral adipose tissue (VAT), which were overestimated. Precision error for the Stratos DR, when expressed as root mean square-coefficient of variation (RMS-CV%) for FM, was 1.4% for WB, 3.0% for the gynoid and android regions, and 15.9% for VAT. The RMS-CV% for FFST was 1.0% for WB. The root mean square of standard deviation for WB BMD was 0.018 g/cm², corresponding to a 1.4% CV. The least significant change was 0.050 g/cm² (SD), and 4.0% was considered to be a significant biological change. CONCLUSIONS: Differences between the Stratos DR and Discovery A measurements are significant and require the use of translational cross-calibration equations. For most of the BMD and body composition parameters, our results demonstrated good Stratos DR precision.

Comparison of the Lunar Prodigy and Stratos DR Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometers to Assess Regional Bone Mineral Density.

PURPOSE: The first objective of the study was to assess the agreement between the Stratos DR (DMS) and the GE Prodigy (GE) DXAs in determining femoral neck, total hip and lumbar spine aBMD. The second objective was to assess the potential impact of leg positioning (hip flexed at 90° or not) on lumbar spine aBMD. METHODS: Forty-six individuals (n=42 women, 91.3%), with a mean age of 59.7 ± 13 years and mean BMI of 23.8 ± 4.7 kg/m², were scanned consecutively on the same day using the two devices. In a subgroup (n=30), two consecutive Stratos DR scans (with hip flexed at 90° or not) at the lumbar spine were conducted. Predictive equations for hip and lumbar spine aBMD were derived from linear regression of the data. RESULTS: Correlation coefficients for aBMD measured with the two DXAs were characterised by an R² of 0.76 for the femoral neck, 0.89 for the total hip, and 0.86 for the lumbar spine. However, the derived equations for aBMD determination showed an intercept significantly different from 0 for hip aBMD, and a slope significantly different from 1 for lumbar spine aBMD. These results highlight a bias between the two measurements, thus requiring the determination of specific cross-calibration equations for hip and lumbar spine, femoral neck excepted. When compared with values on the Prodigy, mean aBMD on the Stratos DR was higher at the femoral neck (+4.8%, p<0.001) and total hip (+9.6%, p<0.001) and lower at L2-L4 (-8.8%, p<0.001). The coefficient of variation (CV%) for the two consecutive measures at lumbar spine (with different positioning) with the Stratos DR was 2.9%. CONCLUSIONS: The difference in aBMD measured with the two DXAs illustrates the need to define cross-calibration equations when comparing data across systems in order to avoid erroneous conclusions.

Modification of bone mineral density, bone geometry and volumetric BMD in young women with obesity.

BACKGROUND: Most obese women with low-trauma fractures present normal areal bone mineral density (aBMD), suggesting that other bone parameters are more determinant for fracture risk in these patients. OBJECTIVES: (i) Determine the effects of obesity in young women on areal bone mineral density (aBMD), bone geometry, strength, and volumetric BMD determined by advanced DXA-based methods; (ii) model the profiles of bone parameters for each population with age; and (iii) determine the factors related to body composition (i.e. lean tissue mass and fat mass) potentially implicated in the "bone adaptation" in the femoral region. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Two hundred and twenty adolescent and young women from 18 to 35 years old were enrolled in this study: 128 patients with obesity and 92 age-matched (±6 months) normal-weight controls. aBMD was determined with DXA, whereas hip geometry and strength parameters were assessed by hip structural analysis (HSA) and volumetric BMD by 3D-SHAPER® software. RESULTS: Compared with controls, subjects with obesity presented significantly higher aBMD at all bone sites, but the difference was greater at hip compared with lumbar spine or radius. Bone size estimates (i.e. cortical thickness), as well as strength estimates (i.e. cross-sectional area) were higher at all femoral subregions including femoral neck, intertrochanteric region and femoral shaft in young women with obesity. In whole proximal femur and all femoral compartments, vBMD was also higher in subjects with obesity, but the difference between groups was greater for cortical vBMD compared with trabecular vBMD. When hip bone parameters were modelled for each group from individual values, maximal values were reached between 20 and 26 years in both groups but, whatever the age, subjects with obesity presented higher values than controls. In both groups, lean body mass (LBM) was the parameter most positively associated with the greatest number of bone parameters studied. CONCLUSION: Our study confirmed that young women with obesity presented higher aBMD, better hip geometry and greater strength compared with normal-weight controls. Additionally, cortical and trabecular compartments measured by 3D-SHAPER® were favourably and concomitantly modified. However, it remains to be demonstrated whether the evaluation of these new parameters would provide better prediction of fracture risk in this population than aBMD.

The quantitative ultrasound method for assessing low bone mass in women with anorexia nervosa.

This study investigated the potential role of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) to assess low bone mass in anorexia nervosa patients (AN). Bone parameters from QUS and DXA were positively correlated and significantly reduced in AN compared with controls, suggesting that QUS is a pertinent technique to assess low bone mass in these patients. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the potential role of an alternative technique, quantitative ultrasound (QUS), to assess low bone mass in patients with anorexia nervosa (AN). METHODS: Two hundred seven young women (134 patients with AN and 73 healthy controls) with ages ranging from 14.4 to 38.4 years participated in this observational cross-sectional study. Bone mass was concomitantly evaluated by DXA to determine areal bone mineral density (aBMD; g/cm2) at hip, lumbar spine, and radius and by QUS to determine broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA; dB/MHz) at the heel. RESULTS: BUA (66.5 ± 4.6 dB/MHz vs 61.0 ± 5.0 dB/MHz) and aBMD at the hip (0.916 ± 0.013 g/cm2 vs 0.806 ± 0.010 g/cm2), lumbar spine (0.966 ± 0.012 g/cm2 vs 0.886 ± 0.010 g/cm2), and radius (0.545 ± 0.005 g/cm2 vs 0.526 ± 0.04 g/cm2) were significantly decreased (p < 0.01) in patients with AN compared with controls. When patient and control data were pooled, BUA was significantly correlated with aBMD at the hip (r = 0.60, p < 0.001), lumbar spine (r = 0.48, p < 0.001), and radius (r = 0.40, p<0.001). In patients with AN, BUA and aBMD were mainly and positively correlated with weight, lean tissue mass, body mass index (BMI), and minimal BMI life and negatively with the duration of both disease and amenorrhea. Better concordance between the two techniques was obtained when absolute BUA and aBMD values were used according to the WHO T score classification. CONCLUSION: BUA measurement at the heel by QUS appears to be a pertinent nonionizing technique to assess low bone mass in patients with AN.

The effect of excessive fat tissue on the measure of bone mineral density by dual X-ray absorptiometry: the impact of substantial weight loss following sleeve gastrectomy.

PURPOSE: Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is used in clinical routine to determine areal bone mineral density (aBMD). However, it is not clear whether excessive fat mass or substantial weight loss modify the aBMD measurements. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of soft tissue composition on aBMD measured by DXA using a clinical model (i.e. sleeve gastrectomy: SG) that induces substantial body weight loss. METHODS: Areal bone mineral density and body composition (fat mass: FM and lean tissue mass: LTM) were determined by DXA in 41 obese patients (33 women, 80.5%) just before SG and 1 month later. RESULTS: One month after SG, mean weight loss was -9.8 ± 2.6 kg, with a significant decrease in LTM and FM (kg) ranging from -7.3% to -9.5%. The relative variation in aBMD was increased at the lumbar spine (2.45 ± 3.44%) and decreased at the hip (-1.47 ± 2.28%), whereas no variation was observed for the whole body and radius. The variation in aBMD at the lumbar spine was inversely correlated with variations in weight, whole-body FM and trunk FM, but not LTM. CONCLUSION: This study shows evidence of a potential effect of body composition, particularly FM, on aBMD. However, given the modest change in aBMD, which was close to the precision error of aBMD measurements, it appears that significant weight loss does not have a clinically significant impact on the evaluation of aBMD using DXA.

Salivary adiponectin levels are associated with training intensity but not with bone mass or reproductive function in elite Rhythmic Gymnasts.

Elite Rhythmic Gymnasts (RGs) constitute a unique metabolic model and they are prone to developing Anorexia Athletica. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of training intensity on salivary adiponectin levels and assess a possible role of salivary adiponectin levels as a predictive factor of reproductive dysfunction and bone mass acquisition in elite RGs. The study included 80 elite female RGs participating in the World Rhythmic Gymnastics Championship tournament held in Montpellier, France on September 2011. Anthropometric values were assessed, training data and menstrual pattern were recorded, bone mass was measured with Broadband ultrasound attenuation (dB/Mhz) and baseline salivary adiponectin levels were determined. The athletes were classified as intensely and very intensely trained, considering the mean training intensity (40.84h/week). Moreover, considering their reproductive status, they were divided into RG's with normal menstruation, primary amenorrhea and oligomenorrhea. All comparisons were adjusted to age, BMI and body fat percentage differences. Very intensely trained RGs showed higher salivary adiponectin levels (p=0.05). Moreover, salivary adiponectin levels showed significant correlation with training intensity (r=0.409, p=0.003). On the other hand, no association of salivary adiponectin levels was documented with either reproductive function or bone mass acquisition. The results of the present study suggest that, in elite RGs, salivary adiponectin levels are associated with the intensity of training, possibly reflecting the deterioration of energy balance rather than the training stress. On the other hand, a predictive role of salivary adiponectin levels in reproductive dysfunction or bone mass acquisition could not be supported.

Despite a high prevalence of menstrual disorders, bone health is improved at a weight-bearing bone site in world-class female rhythmic gymnasts.

CONTEXT: Regular physical activity during puberty improves bone mass acquisition. However, it is unknown whether extreme intense training has the same favorable effect on the skeleton. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the bone mass acquisition in a unique cohort of world-class rhythmic gymnasts. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: A total of 133 adolescent girls and young women with a mean age of 18.7 ± 2.7 (14.4-26.7) years participated in this study: 82 elite rhythmic gymnasts (RGs) and 51 controls (CONs). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Anthropometric variables and body composition were assessed, and all participants completed questionnaires on their general medical, menstrual, and training histories. Broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA in decibels per megahertz) was determined by quantitative ultrasound at the heel. RESULTS: RGs presented lower weight (-8.5%, P < .001), body mass index (-11.7%, P < .001), and body fat mass (-43%, P < .001) and higher muscle mass (6.3%, P < .01) and height (+2.8 cm, P < .01). RGs presented an age of menarche significantly delayed compared with CONs (15.6 ± 1.6 vs 12.7 ± 1.7 years; P < .001) and a high prevalence of menstrual disorders (64%). BUA values were higher in RGs vs CONs (68.6 ± 4.6 and 65.4 ± 3.3 dB/Mhz, respectively; P < .001). This difference was exacerbated when BUA was adjusted for age and body weight. BUA values in RGs were not affected by menstrual or training status. Among RGs with menarche, BUA was higher (71.5 ± 4.1 and 67.9 ± 3.5 dB/Mhz) for delayed (14.4 ± 0.8 years) vs severely delayed (17.3 ± 1.4 years) menarcheal age. BUA was positively correlated with body weight and body mass index and tended to be correlated with age. CONCLUSION: Conversely to expectations for adolescents and young women with a high prevalence of menstrual disorders and/or delayed menarche, intense training in rhythmic gymnastics appeared to have a beneficial effect on the bone health of a weight-bearing site. This effect was nevertheless modulated by the age of menarche. The high mechanical loading generated by this activity may counterbalance the negative effect of menstrual disorders.

Assessment of the Stratos, a new pencil-beam bone densitometer: dosimetry, precision, and cross calibration.

The goal of this study was to assess a new pencil-beam densitometer, the Stratos (Diagnostic Medical Systems, Pérols, France). Evaluation of the dosimetry and precision were done together with an in vivo cross-calibration study performed with the fan beam densitometer Discovery A (Hologic, Bedford, MA). The results indicated that the Stratos performed bone mineral density (BMD) measurements with a good precision, low radiation dose, and good agreement with the Discovery A. The air dose, measured by an ionization chamber, was 40 µGy. The effective dose was assessed using an anthropomorphic phantom and thermoluminescent detectors resulting in 1.96 and 0.31 µSv for a lumbar spine and proximal femur scan, respectively. The average scattered dose rate at a distance of 1m from the device was 1.06 and 1.21 µSv.h(-1) in the lumbar spine and left proximal femur scan mode, respectively. For the precision evaluation, 30 patients underwent 2 lumbar spine and 2 proximal femur scans with repositioning after each scan. The percentage root-mean-square coefficient of variation was 1.22%, 1.38%, 2.11%, and 0.86% for the lumbar spine (L1-L4), lumbar spine (L2-L4), femoral neck, and total hip, respectively. The cross-calibration studies were done on 57 patients (60 ± 9 yr). Lumbar spine, left neck, and left total hip mean BMD were 3.10% lower and 11.94% and 8.83% higher, respectively, with the Stratos compared with the Discovery A. Cross-calibration equations were calculated with a correlation coefficient of 98% (p<0.01) for the lumbar spine (L2-L4), 94% (p<0.01) for the left neck, and 92% (p<0.01) for the left total hip. After standardizing the Stratos measures using the cross-calibration equations, LIN's concordance correlation coefficient was 0.98, 0.93, and 0.92 for the lumbar spine (L2-L4), left neck, and total hip, respectively.