Dendritic Versus Tumor Cell Presentation of Autologous Tumor Antigens for Active Specific Immunotherapy in Metastatic Melanoma: Impact on Long-Term Survival by Extent of Disease at the Time of Treatment.

In patients with metastatic melanoma, sequential single-arm and randomized phase II trials with a therapeutic vaccine consisting of autologous dendritic cells (DCs) loaded with antigens from self-renewing, proliferating, irradiated autologous tumor cells (DC-TC) showed superior survival compared with similar patients immunized with irradiated tumor cells (TC). We wished to determine whether this difference was evident in cohorts who at the time of treatment had (1) no evidence of disease (NED) or (2) had detectable disease. Eligibility criteria and treatment schedules were the same for all three trials. Pooled data confirmed that overall survival (OS) was longer in 72 patients treated with DC-TC compared with 71 patients treated with TC (median OS 60 versus 22 months; 5-year OS 51% versus 32%, p=0.004). Treatment with DC-TC was associated with longer OS in both cohorts. Among 70 patients who were NED at the time that treatment was started, OS was better for DC-TC: 5-year OS 73% versus 43% (p=0.015). Among 73 patients who had detectable metastases, OS was better for DC-TC: median 38.8 months versus 14.7 months, 5-year OS 33% versus 20% (p=0.025). This approach is promising as an adjunct to other therapies in patients who have had metastatic melanoma.

Should high-dose interleukin-2 still be the preferred treatment for patients with metastatic melanoma?

For more than 20 years interleukin-2 (IL2) was the preferred treatment for medically fit metastatic melanoma patients, but recently two new agents, ipilimumab and vemurafenib, were approved for stage IV disease. Single-institution data were used to determine the long-term survival rate for IL2-treated melanoma patients, and whether use of inpatient IL2 had declined recently. Between May 1987 and April 2010, 150 patients were hospitalized for high-dose, intravenous (i.v.) IL2. The average number of IL2 patients increased from 5.4 per year during 1987-1991 to 5.8 during 1992-1997 after regulatory approval of IL2, to 8.3 during 1998-2006 after a marketing indication in metastatic melanoma was granted, but dropped to 3.0 during 2007-2010. At the time of treatment, median age was 52 years; 27% were 60 years of age or older. At the time of analysis 122 patients were deceased. Median survival from the start date of IL2 treatment was 15.6 months, with a 20% 5-year survival. Among patients enrolled in clinical trials, there were as many nonresponders who survived 5 years as responders, which is consistent with a delayed immunotherapy benefit. In the absence of long-term survival data for these newer agents, IL2 probably should still be the preferred initial treatment for most patients with metastatic melanoma who are medically fit.

Should high-dose interleukin-2 still be the preferred treatment for patients with metastatic renal cell cancer?

Interleukin-2 (IL-2) was the preferred treatment for medically fit patients with advanced kidney cancer, but recently, several targeted therapies have been approved for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. We wished to determine the long-term survival rate for patients with kidney cancer treated with IL-2 and whether the use of intense inpatient IL-2 has declined since the introduction of targeted therapies. Patients who received IL-2 were identified from clinical trial enrollment, pharmacy logs, and financial billing records. Survival was determined from the earliest date of IL-2 therapy. There were 79 patients hospitalized for high-dose infusional IL-2 between March 1989 and March 2009. Median age was 58 years, and 27% were older than 65 years at the time of treatment. At the time of this analysis, 72 patients had deceased. Median survival was 9.9 months, but 5-year survival was 19.4%. The average number of patients with IL-2 increased from 2.2 per year during 1989-1992 to 5.6 during 1993-2001 after FDA approval, but dropped to 2.0 during 2002-2009. High-dose IL-2 is associated with a 5-year survival rate that is higher than objective response rates, suggesting a delayed immunotherapy benefit for some patients. The use of intensive IL-2 has declined dramatically in recent years, but unless a long-term survival benefit can be shown for these new targeted products, we feel that inpatient IL-2 remains the preferred initial treatment.

Phase II trial of subcutaneous interferon followed by intravenous hybrid bolus/continuous infusion interleukin-2 in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma: final results of Cancer Biotherapy Research Group 95-09.

OBJECTIVE: We conducted a phase II trial in metastatic renal cell cancer of outpatient subcutaneous (s.c.) interferon-alpha2b (IFN), followed by an inpatient hybrid schedule of bolus and continuous interleukin-2 (IL- 2). METHODS: Treatment consisted of monthly IFN 10 MU/m(2) s.c. for 4 consecutive days, followed by 36 MIU/m(2) bolus IL-2, then 72-hour continuous intravenous (i.v.) infusion of 18 MIU/m(2) IL-2 per day. Between May 1997 and June 2000, 25 men and 11 women enrolled, with a median age of 57 years (range, 42-77), including 9 patients over 65. Prior treatment included nephrectomy (31), radiation (8), biotherapy (7), and chemotherapy (4). Sites of disease included 26 lung, 13 lymph node, 9 bone, 8 liver, 4 kidney, and 4 adrenal locations. Patients received an average of 3.1 treatment cycles (range, 1-6). RESULTS: There was 1 complete and 3 partial responses, for a response rate of 11% (3% to 27%; 95% confidence interval [CI]); 40% had stable disease. Median failure-free survival was 2.5 months; median overall survival was 15.0 months. The 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates were 53%, 30%, and 12%, respectively. Only 8 patients required a reduction in IL-2 dose. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 toxicities were 11% fatigue, 9% renal insufficiency, and 7% hypotension. CONCLUSIONS: Response and survival rates were similar to those seen in other multicenter trials using inpatient high-dose IL-2.

Autologous tumor cell line-derived vaccine for patient-specific treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma.

AIM: We previously reported the laboratory methodology for producing patient-specific irradiated autologous tumor-cell products derived from short-term cultured tumor cells from resected renal cell carcinoma, and described preliminary clinical results. In this study, we report the final clinical results and efforts to define vaccine potency on the basis of clinical outcome for these 25 patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Approximately 10(8) cells from successful short-term cell lines were irradiated, frozen in aliquots of 10(7) cells, then thawed and administered subcutaneously (s.c.) once a week for 3 weeks, then once a month for 5 months. Patients included 19 men and 6 women, who were 43-82 years of age. Six (6) patients had a large primary lesion, 2 patients had regionally advanced disease, 3 patients had been rendered disease-free by surgical resection of distant metastases, and 14 patients had measurable distant metastatic disease. RESULTS: The vaccines were well tolerated, and no delayed autoimmune effects were documented. Delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) tests of irradiated tumor cells were positive in only 1 of 25 patients at week 0, but converted to positive in 6 of 18 patients of DTH-negative patients who were retested at week 4. Objective response rate in patients who had measurable metastatic disease was 0 of 14 patients. With a median follow-up of greater than 7 years from the date of the first DTH test, median survival is 33.4 months, 5-year survival is 43%, and 10 patients are alive 3-12 years later. The 7 DTH+ patients survived a median of 2.5 years, and 3 patients are alive after 3, 4, and 7 years. There was no correlation between the number of irradiated cells or viable irradiated cells injected and tumor DTH reactivity or survival. CONCLUSION: This approach is feasible and the therapy is well tolerated, but clinical benefit was not established in this trial. Any further exploration of this product should be limited to the adjuvant setting in a randomized trial.