Chromosomal gains and losses detected by comparative genomic hybridization and proliferation activity in renal cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: The number of DNA losses found using comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and the proliferation index MIB-1 have been shown to be prognostic factors in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We evaluated the associations of these two factors with each other and with histopathology and clinical outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this prospective study, specimens from 20 primary RCCs were investigated using CGH and MIB-1 assay. The associations of the commonest chromosomal aberrations with histopathology, stage and the clinical outcome of the disease were evaluated. RESULTS: CGH detected genetic aberrations in all tumours. Losses of genetic material (85%) were more common than gains (65%). Most common was loss in the short arm of chromosome 3, which was found in 70% of the tumours. Other frequent changes (20%) were losses of 4q, 13q, 18 and Xp, as well as gains of 5q, 7p, 7q (25%) and chromosome 12. The number of deleted chromosomal areas varied from none to six. The MIB-1 index varied from 0 to 39 (median 4.0). The total number of chromosomal aberrations or deletions showed no association with MIB-1 index or nuclear grade. Most grade 1 and 2 tumours showed a low MIB-1 index. All nuclear grade 4 tumours progressed and were associated with short survival. CONCLUSION: CGH gives an overview of DNA changes in RCC and helps to locate targets for more precise genetic evaluation. CGH findings are also helpful for classifying tumours. In this study, genetic aberrations in primary RCCs were not associated with histopathology, proliferation or clinical outcome, which suggests that CGH does not necessarily give any additional information on the prognosis of the disease. MIB-1 index and TNM stage were associated with survival.

Survey of genetic alterations in gastrinomas.

Gastrinomas are rare gastrin-secreting endocrine tumors that usually arise in the duodenum or pancreas and, if untreated, can cause severe peptic ulcers or metastatic disease. Although most tumors are sporadic they are especially common in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1), and most studies of these tumors have focused on the role of the MEN1 gene. Although the gene is commonly altered in sporadic tumors, this finding is not universal, and it is highly likely that other genetic defects play a significant role. In the present study, an in-depth analysis of the DNA of eight tumors was carried out in an effort to localize these areas. The experiments consisted of an analysis of 400 microsatellite marker loci distributed evenly throughout the human genome, and the results were confirmed with comparative genomic hybridization. Whereas deletions encompassing the MEN1 gene were seen in two tumors, the most striking result was multiple large rearrangements on chromosome 1 in two of the tumors with hepatic metastases. In several instances, an individual tumor had abnormalities of every informative maker on a given chromosome, presumably as a result of aneuploidy affecting that chromosome. Such defects were only seen in the four large or aggressive tumors, and the total number of chromosomes affected in a tumor ranged from 1 to a high of 13 in a patient who had an unusually aggressive tumor This tumor also showed microsatellite instability, and this is the first report of such a defect in gastrinomas. This study implicates chromosome 1 defects, aneuploidy, and perhaps mismatch repair defects as importan features of gastrinomas; deletions involving the MEN1 gene were con firmed, but the rest of the genome was free of large deletions or amplifications.

Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of 38 breast cancer cell lines: a basis for interpreting complementary DNA microarray data.

Breast cancer cell lines provide a useful starting point for the discovery and functional analysis of genes involved in breast cancer. Here, we studied 38 established breast cancer cell lines by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) to determine recurrent genetic alterations and the extent to which these cell lines resemble uncultured tumors. The following chromosomal gains were observed: 8q (75%), 1q (61%), 20q (55%), 7p (44%), 3q (39%), 5p (39%), 7q (39%), 17q (33%), 1p (30%), and 20p (30%), and the most common losses were: 8p (58%), 18q (58%), 1p (42%), Xp (42%), Xq (42%), 4p (36%), 11q (36%), 18p (33%), 10q (30%), and 19p (28%). Furthermore, 35 recurrent high-level amplification sites were identified, most often involving 8q23 (37%), 20q13 (29%), 3q25-q26 (24%), 17q22-q23 (16%), 17q23-q24 (16%), 1p13 (11%), 1q32 (11%), 5p13 (11%), 5p14 (11%), 11q13 (11%), 17q12-q21 (11%), and 7q21-q22 (11%). A comparison of DNA copy number changes found in the cell lines with those reported in 17 published studies (698 tumors) of uncultured tumors revealed a substantial degree of overlap. CGH copy number profiles may facilitate identification of important new genes located at the hotspots of such chromosomal alterations. This was illustrated by analyzing expression levels of 1236 genes using cDNA microarrays in four of the cell lines. Several highly overexpressed genes (such as RCH1 at 17q23, TOPO II at 17q21-q22, as well as CAS and MYBL2 at 20q13) were involved in these recurrent DNA amplifications. In conclusion, DNA copy number profiles were generated by CGH for most of the publicly available breast cancer cell lines and were made available on a web site (http://www.nhgri.nih.gov/DIR/CGB/++ +CR2000). This should facilitate the correlative analysis of gene expression and copy number as illustrated here by the finding by cDNA microarrays of several overexpressed genes that were amplified.

Characterization of genomically amplified segments using PCR: optimizing relative-PCR for reliable and simple gene expression and gene copy analyses.

Gene amplification is one of the mechanisms for oncogene activation in solid tumors. The size of the amplified regions may vary considerably among individual tumors, and more than one gene may be affected within the same amplicon. The main objective in analyzing genomic amplifications has therefore been to map the shortest region involved and to identify genes with increased expression as a result of the increased gene copy number. To facilitate such an analysis, we have developed simple polymerase chain reaction (PCR) procedures using the internal standards beta-actin (ACTB) and L1Hs for gene expression and gene copy number analyses, respectively. We used cDNA derived from pancreatic carcinoma cell lines, and genomic DNA extracted from the same cell lines, as templates in the gene expression and in the gene copy number analyses, respectively. To determine the optimal number of PCR cycles, dilution series of the templates were made. Furthermore, competing primers were used to adjust for differences in target sequence levels. We show that by these simple means it is possible to determine optimal conditions for expression analyses. In addition, the procedure was adapted for the analysis of gene copy number changes at the genomic level using L1Hs as the internal standard. This PCR method makes it possible to produce detailed gene copy number profiles of amplified genomic regions.

Comparative genomic hybridization reveals frequent gains of 20q, 8q, 11q, 12p, and 17q, and losses of 18q, 9p, and 15q in pancreatic cancer.

Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) was used to screen for genomic imbalances in 24 exocrine pancreatic carcinomas, including II low-passage cell lines (4-8 subcultures) and 13 uncultured samples. Aberrations were found in all cell lines and in seven of the 13 biopsies. The most frequent changes in the cell lines were gains of 20q (91%), 11q (64%), 17q (64%), 19q (64%), 8q, 12p, 14q, and 20p (55%), and losses of 18q (100%), 9p (91%), 15q(73%), 21q (64%), 3p (55%), and 13q (55%). High-levels gains (tumor to normal ratio over 1.5) were detected at 3q, 6p, 7q, 8q, 12p, 19q, and 20q. Among the tumor biopsies, overrepresentations of 7p and 8q were most common (31%), followed by 5p, 5q, 11p, 11q, 12p, and 18q (23%), whereas the most frequent losses involved 18p and 18q (31%) and 6q and 17p (23%). The genetic changes in nine samples obtained from metastatic lesions did not differ significantly from those in 15 primary carcinomas. Most of the gains and losses detected in this CGH study correspond well to those identified in previous cytogenetic and molecular genetic investigations of pancreatic carcinomas. However, frequent gain of 12p and loss of 15q have not been previously reported. Molecular genetic analyses of these chromosome arms are warranted, and may lead to the discovery of novel genes important in pancreatic carcinogenesis.