ABSTRACT
Anterior cruciate ligament injury is one of the commonest sports injuries, which often markedly reduces activity and the quality of life. The autologous hamstring double bundle graft and single bundle graft are commonly used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The choice of graft material for ACL reconstruction is believed to play a major role in the outcome but still there are controversies about the graft selection for primary ACL reconstruction. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and functional outcome of autologous double bundle (DB) hamstring graft and single bundle (SB) hamstring graft reconstruction for the ACL injury. This prospective observational study was conducted in the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, Bangladesh from March 2015 to September 2017. Total 42 cases of ACL injury that required reconstruction surgery was selected as per inclusion criteria. Total patients were allocated into two groups. One group was treated by single bundle graft and other group was treated by double bundle graft for the ACL reconstruction. In this study, the mean age of double bundle and single bundle groups were 28±6.63 and 30.14±7.55 years respectively and majority of the subjects were male. The post-operative symptoms and signs were more improved in double bundle group than single bundle group during last follow-up period of 6th months. The Lachman test, Anterior drawer test and pivot sift test were more negative in double bundle group than that of single bundle groups. The Lysholm and Tegner activity were better in double bundle group than single bundle group. Again rotational and anterior stability of the knee was better in the double bundle group. However, the differences were not statistically significant and all patients in our study were able to return their activity. Double bundle group showed better rotational stability than the single bundle groups and all knees were improved by anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction compared with their pre-operative status.
