ABSTRACT
As long-term service expenditures have risen, policymakers have sought ways to control costs while maintaining consumer satisfaction. Concurrently, there is increasing interest in the disability community in consumer direction. The Cash and Counseling Demonstration and Evaluation (CCDE) seeks to increase consumer direction and control costs by offering a cash allowance and information services to persons with disabilities, enabling them to purchase needed assistance. Because the disability community is composed of diverse subgroups, needs of these consumer communities must be assessed individually. Results from a telephone survey conducted to assess the interest in a cash option for Florida adults with developmental disabilities is presented, the three-state CCDE described, how survey findings can inform consumer information efforts discussed, and policy issues highlighted.
Subject(s)
Consumer Behavior/statistics & numerical data , Medicaid/economics , Medical Assistance/organization & administration , Persons with Mental Disabilities/rehabilitation , Proxy/psychology , Adult , Arkansas , Consumer Behavior/economics , Female , Florida , Humans , Male , Medicaid/statistics & numerical data , Medical Assistance/economics , New Jersey , Persons with Mental Disabilities/psychology , Regional Medical Programs/economics , Regional Medical Programs/organization & administration , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
One possible approach for making long-term-care systems more consumer-directed is to provide the consumer with a cash alternative. Advocates have touted the possible advantages of this approach, while nay-sayers have worried about the potential for abuse and questioned the claims of cost savings. This article describes the Cash and Counseling Project, a large-scale demonstration project with a rigorous, policy-driven evaluation built into it. Written prior to the project's actual implementation, this article specifically reviews the major evaluation questions, and the state selection process.
Subject(s)
Case Management/organization & administration , Choice Behavior , Counseling , Managed Care Programs/organization & administration , Patient Participation , Personal Health Services/organization & administration , Humans , Program EvaluationABSTRACT
As long-term care (LTC) expenditures have risen, policymakers have sought ways to control costs while maintaining consumer satisfaction. Concurrently, there is increasing interest within the aging and disability communities in consumer-directed care. The Cash and Counseling Demonstration and Evaluation (CCDE) seeks to increase consumer direction and control costs by offering a cash allowance and information services to persons with disabilities, enabling them to purchase needed assistance. The authors present results from a telephone survey conducted to assess consumer preferences for a cash option in Arkansas and describe how findings from the four-State CCDE can inform consumer information efforts and policymakers.
Subject(s)
Consumer Behavior , Disabled Persons , Health Services Accessibility , Personal Health Services/economics , Arkansas , Cost Control , Data Collection , Demography , Health Policy , Health Services Research/methods , Program EvaluationABSTRACT
Polysplenia syndrome includes malrotation and various forms of heterotaxy. Associated with this and malrotation are extrahepatic biliary anomalies. Actual obstruction, other than in associated biliary atresia, is extremely rare, and rarer still in older children. An 11-year-old girl presented with obstructive jaundice, malrotation, and heterotaxy, which were found in association with common bile duct anomalies and intermittent common bile duct obstruction. This case illustrates that the differential diagnosis of obstructive jaundice, even in older children, should include congenital anomalies, and that biliary anomalies should be considered in cases of malrotation and heterotaxy.
Subject(s)
Abnormalities, Multiple , Biliary Tract/abnormalities , Cholestasis/etiology , Spleen/abnormalities , Child , Digestive System Abnormalities , Female , Humans , SyndromeABSTRACT
Responses to the growing crisis in long-term care financing have included efforts to negotiate partnerships between the private and public sectors for the purpose of developing innovative models for long-term care insurance. One such set of models has been encouraged by support from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's "Long Term Care Insurance Program" grants. The Connecticut Partnership for Long Term Care uses a cooperative approach to encourage the development of private sector long-term care insurance products that are integrated with Medicaid eligibility determinations. The Connecticut model is described, accompanied by a history of its development, and a comparison is made with other models currently under consideration by national policy analysts.
Subject(s)
Financing, Government/organization & administration , Financing, Personal/organization & administration , Insurance, Long-Term Care/economics , Interinstitutional Relations , Models, Organizational , Connecticut , Cost Allocation , Cost Sharing , Costs and Cost Analysis , Financing, Government/trends , Financing, Personal/trends , Humans , Motivation , National Health Insurance, United States , Poverty , Program Development , United StatesSubject(s)
Frail Elderly , Health Care Rationing/economics , Health Services for the Aged/economics , State Health Plans/economics , Aged , Budgets/legislation & jurisprudence , Connecticut , Financing, Government/legislation & jurisprudence , Georgia , Health Services Needs and Demand , Humans , New Jersey , New York , United StatesABSTRACT
Under Connecticut's recently implemented public/private partnership to finance long-term care, individuals will no longer need to impoverish themselves in order to receive Medicaid assistance. To encourage those people who can afford to buy a private long-term care insurance policy to do so, the state promises to shield one dollar in assets from Medicaid "spend-down" rules for every dollar a private policy pays out for Medicaid-covered services. This article describes the Partnership, shows how dwindling resources and budget constraints affected the development of this model, and then contrasts Connecticut's experience with that of other states and describes what can be learned from this demonstration.