Improvements in quality of life over 2 years with cladribine tablets in people with relapsing multiple sclerosis: The CLARIFY-MS study.

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) negatively affects health-related quality of life (HRQoL). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate HRQoL in people with highly active relapsing MS treated with cladribine tablets (CladT; 3.5 mg/kg cumulative dose over 2 years) in CLARIFY-MS. METHODS: Changes in the MS quality of life (MSQoL)-54 scores were analysed using a repeated mixed-effects linear model. Subgroup analyses were performed for participants who were pretreatment-naïve and those pretreated with disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) before initiating CladT. Safety and tolerability of CladT were also assessed. RESULTS: MSQoL-54 physical (mean change = 4.86; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 3.18, 6.53) and mental health (4.80; 95% CI = 3.13, 6.46) composite scores (primary endpoints) showed significant improvement at Month 24 versus Baseline (p < 0.0001). Changes in the MSQoL-54 scores were consistent across the pretreatment-naïve and DMT-pretreated subgroups. No new severe or opportunistic infections occurred. Most post-baseline lymphopenia events were Grade 1-2 in severity. Transient Grade-3 lymphopenia was observed in 19.7% (95/482) of participants. Grade-4 lymphopenia was not observed. CONCLUSIONS: CladT treatment significantly improved the mean MSQoL-54 physical and mental health composite scores over 2 years. CladT efficacy in HRQoL, relapse rates and Expanded Disability Status Scale scores demonstrates its multidimensional effects in MS treatment.

Satisfaction and adherence with glatiramer acetate 40mg/mL TIW in RRMS after 12 months, and the effect of switching from 20mg/mL QD.

BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction with treatment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) has a direct impact on adherence to treatment and, consequently, upon treatment outcomes and costs. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are a common method for determining patient satisfaction in MS and other diseases. METHODS: The 12-month, open-label, Phase IV CONFIDENCE study assessed patient satisfaction and treatment adherence, using PROs, as well as safety outcomes in patients with RRMS treated with glatiramer acetate (GA). In the previously reported (Cutter et al., 2019) initial 6-month core phase of the study, patients were randomized to receive three-times-weekly (TIW) GA 40 mg/mL (GA40; n = 431) or once-daily GA 20 mg/mL (GA20; n = 430). In the 6-month, single-arm extension phase, 789 patients completing the core phase were treated with GA40 to determine whether benefits observed in the core phase were sustained during the extension phase, to ascertain if switching from GA20 to GA40 resulted in PRO changes, and to assess safety outcomes. RESULTS: Superior PRO scores for patient satisfaction with treatment, patient perception of treatment convenience, and symptomatic changes (fatigue impact and mental health) observed in the GA40 group versus the GA20 group in the core phase were all maintained in the extension phase. Treatment adherence, significantly greater in the GA40 versus the GA20 group in the core phase, was sustained in patients continuing to receive GA40 in the extension phase, while those who switched from GA20 to GA40 increased their adherence during the extension phase. Safety variables remained consistent throughout the study, with no notable changes observed in patients switching from GA20 to GA40. CONCLUSIONS: Data from the extension phase of the CONFIDENCE study show that the benefits associated with GA40 treatment in terms of medication satisfaction, treatment convenience perception, symptomatic changes in fatigue impact and mental health status, and treatment adherence were maintained over a 12-month observation period. These results confirm the preferential utility of GA40 versus GA20 in clinical practice, with no additional safety concerns associated with switching from GA20 to GA40.

Higher satisfaction and adherence with glatiramer acetate 40 mg/mL TIW vs 20 mg/mL QD in RRMS.

BACKGROUND: Patients who perceive their medication to be ineffective or inconvenient are less likely to be adherent to treatment, with potentially significant consequences on long-term clinical outcomes. Many patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) are nonadherent to treatment despite demonstrated efficacy of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). While glatiramer acetate (GA; Copaxone®, Teva Pharmaceuticals) both 20 mg/mL once daily (GA20) and 40 mg/mL three times weekly (GA40) have demonstrated efficacy in relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), GA40 has a superior tolerability profile in addition to a more convenient dosing schedule. These characteristics may give rise to greater treatment satisfaction and higher rates of adherence with potentially beneficial effects on clinical outcomes and health-related costs. METHODS: CONFIDENCE was a Phase 4, interventional, open-label, randomized, 2-arm, parallel-group, global study with a duration of 6 months. Patients (N = 861) were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive GA20 (n = 430) or GA40 (n = 431) during the core phase. The primary endpoint was patient-reported medication satisfaction using the Medication Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ). Secondary endpoints included self-reported convenience perception using the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication-9 convenience component, symptomatic changes (Modified Fatigue Impact Scale, MFIS), and Mental Health Inventory (MHI). Treatment adherence was measured by Multiple Sclerosis Treatment Adherence Questionnaire. Results from the core phase were included. RESULTS: During the core phase, 857 patients received treatments. Patients on GA40 were statistically significantly more satisfied with their medication than those on GA20 (LSM difference in MSQ, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.2, 0.5; p<0.001). Additionally, patients on GA40 found the treatment more convenient (p<0.001), were more adherent (p = 0.002), and reported statistically significant greater improvements in the MFIS Cognitive (p = 0.043) and the MHI Behavior Control (p = 0.014) subscales versus those on GA20. There were no new safety findings. CONCLUSIONS: Higher levels of satisfaction, perception of convenience, and adherence were reported by patients on GA40 than those on GA20. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02499900).

Modafinil in treatment of fatigue in multiple sclerosis. Results of an open-label study.

BACKGROUND: Modafinil is a unique wake-promoting agent that is chemically distinct from traditional stimulants. Results of a placebo-controlled study showed it to improve fatigue in multiple sclerosis (MS) at a dose of 200 mg daily, but not at a dose of 400 mg daily. OBJECTIVE: To establish the efficacy, safety and appropriate dose of modafinil in the treatment of fatigue and sleepiness in patients with multiple sclerosis. METHOD: A total of 50 patients diagnosed with MS (mean age 40.4 +/- 10.3 years, 30 females/20 males; MS type: 36 relapsing remitting, 1 primary progressive, 13 secondary progressive; mean disability level 3.8 +/- 1.5 on the Kurtzke EDSS) and complaining of chronic fatigue were enrolled in a prospective 3-month, two-center, open-label study. Efficacy was evaluated with the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS, score range 0-42), the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS, score range 0-24) and by subjective patient appraisal of change of fatigue, quality of life and overall satisfaction with treatment. Adverse effects (AEs) were recorded throughout the study. Treatment was started with a single daily dose of 100 mg in all patients. In non-responders the dose was increased by 100 mg increments up to a maximum daily dose of 400 mg. RESULTS: Three patients discontinued modafinil because of AEs (nervousness, dizziness). Two patients (4 %) were treated with 50 mg, 25 (50 %) with 100 mg, 21 (42 %) with 200 mg and 2 (4 %) with 300 mg daily. No patient required 400 mg daily. Mean FSS scores were 30.3 +/- 8.5 at baseline and 25.4 +/- 3.7 at 3 months (p < 0.0001). Mean ESS scores were 9.7 +/- 3.9 at baseline and 4.9 +/- 2.9 at 3 months (p < 0.0001). Self-appraisal of change of fatigue showed clear improvement in 41 patients (87.2 %), some improvement in 4 (8.5 %) and no change in 2 (4.3 %). Overall clinical condition was clearly improved in 43 patients (91.5 %), somewhat improved in 1 patient (2.1 %), and unchanged in 3 patients (6.4 %). No patient reported worsening of overall clinical condition. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with modafinil significantly improves fatigue and sleepiness and is well tolerated by patients with MS. Unlike the higher dose regimen required in narcolepsy, a low-dose regimen of modafinil is effective in MS.