Treatment Strategies for Filamentous Fungi Keratitis.

INTRODUCTION: This research aims to describe clinical findings, epidemiology and treatment outcomes in patients with filamentous fungi keratitis of a tertiary centre in Germany over a 7-year period and to compare the efficacy of different antifungal treatments and the effect of additive topical steroids. METHODS: This retrospective study included 25 eyes of 23 patients from October 2013 to December 2020 with cultural isolates of filamentous fungi and corresponding keratitis. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), clinical signs, symptoms, risk factors and outcome were extracted from medical records. RESULTS: Improvement of BVCA was noted in 68% of eyes. Mean BCVA of the study population increased from 0.75 logMAR [median 0.40, standard deviation (SD) 0.82, range 0-2.3] to 0.48 logMAR (median 0.10, SD 0.88, range - 0.1 to 3). The most commonly used antifungal topical treatment was a combination of natamycin 5% and voriconazole 2% (44% of eyes), followed by voriconazole 2% in 36% of cases. An antiinflammatory topical steroid was applied in 52%. In 16% of the eyes, penetrating keratoplasty (pKP) was performed. CONCLUSION: Diagnosis of filamentous fungi keratitis is often difficult or delayed. Outcomes can be poor even with intensive treatment because of high resistance to common antifungals. Access to natamycin 5% seems to lead to favourable outcomes in filamentous fungi keratitis.

[Clinical Decision Making for Treatment of Diabetic Macular Oedema with DEX Implant: a Consensus Paper]. / Klinische Entscheidungsfindung bei der Behandlung des diabetischen Makulaödems mit DEX-Implantat: ein Konsenspapier.

BACKGROUND: Currently two intravitreally applied corticosteroids (dexamethasone and fluocinolone) are licensed in Germany for treatment of diabetic macular oedema (DME). The use of DEX implant for DME in daily clinical practice has not been defined in detail. Following a Delphi panel survey, a group of retina experts set out to come up with a consensus for use of the DEX implant in DME. MATERIAL AND METHODS: International and national treatment recommendations were identified from the literature. A steering group generated a catalogue of 72 statements on the aetiology and pathogenesis of DME, therapy with DEX implant, use of DEX implant in patients previously treated with VEGF-inhibitors, use of DEX implant in combination therapy, safety of DME therapies as well as patients' burden of treatment. Twenty-two ophthalmologists from private practice and 6 hospital ophthalmologists participated in the Delphi panel via Survey Monkey. Consensus was reached if at least 75% of participants agreed or disagreed with a statement. Statements for which consensus was not reached were discussed once more during the expert consensus meeting and a vote was taken. Based on these results a treatment algorithm for foveal DME was proposed. RESULTS: If a patient does not show sufficient response after 3 - 6 months of anti-VEGF treatment (visual acuity gain of < 5 ETDRS letters or reduction of central retinal thickness ≤ 20%), a switch to DEX implant should take place. DEX implant is also suitable in eyes with longer presentation of DME, showing e.g. massive lipid exudates. DEX implant is suitable as first-line therapy especially in pseudophakic patients, patients unwilling or able to comply with tight anti-VEGF injection intervals or patients with known vascular diseases. With fixed control visits every 4 - 8 weeks, use of DEX implant is flexible and individual. Decision parameters for repeated use should be visual acuity, retinal thickness and intraocular pressure. Treatment of both eyes on the same day should not take place. CONCLUSION: The algorithm presented reflects survey as well as expert discussion results and may differ from recommendations issued by the German professional society. The consensus recommendations for the treatment of DME generated during the survey and meeting of retina experts are intended to guide use of DEX implant in daily practice.

[Retinal Vascular Occlusion: Modern Therapeutic Approaches]. / Retinale Gefäßverschlüsse: Moderne Therapieansätze.

Retinal artery occlusion (RAO) should be evaluated as an emergency and can be seen as an ocular analogue to the cerebral apoplex. Both have the same arteriosclerotic risk factors, which are also responsible for cardiac, circulatory and cerebrovascular diseases. That is why an intensive interdisciplinary clarification is necessary to recognize possible comorbidities in time and, if necessary, to treat them. The current therapeutic possibilities of an acute RAO are very limited in their efficiency regarding visual improvement. Methods for systemic lysis cannot be recommended in routine care because of their significantly increased side-effect profile. However, there is a limited window of time of up to 6 hours after the onset of symptoms in which an intervention appears to be useful at all. On the other hand, the new therapeutic possibilities of retinal vein occlusions (RVO) led to marked visual improvements, especially due to the intravitreal application of anti-VEGF. Safety and efficiency of the individual anti-VEGF drugs are comparable according to clinical trials. Alternatively, the use of intravitreal steroids can be considered, whereby the side-effect profile should be carefully weighed. In the presence of retinal ischaemia, peripheral laser coagulation can have a stabilizing effect on visual acuity and prevents neovascularization. It is postulated that the combination of anti-VEGF and laser therapy might have a symbiotic effect.

Calculating the individual probability of successful ocriplasmin treatment in eyes with VMT syndrome: a multivariable prediction model from the EXPORT study.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate predictive factors for the treatment success of ocriplasmin and to use these factors to generate a multivariate model to calculate the individual probability of successful treatment. METHODS: Data were collected in a retrospective, multicentre cohort study. Patients with vitreomacular traction (VMT) syndrome without a full-thickness macular hole were included if they received an intravitreal injection (IVI) of ocriplasmin. Five factors (age, gender, lens status, presence of epiretinal membrane (ERM) formation and horizontal diameter of VMT) were assessed on their association with VMT resolution. A multivariable logistic regression model was employed to further analyse these factors and calculate the individual probability of successful treatment. RESULTS: 167 eyes of 167 patients were included. Univariate analysis revealed a significant correlation to VMT resolution for all analysed factors: age (years) (OR 0.9208; 95% CI 0.8845 to 0.9586; p<0.0001), gender (male) (OR 0.480; 95% CI 0.241 to 0.957; p=0.0371), lens status (phakic) (OR 2.042; 95% CI 1.054 to 3.958; p=0.0344), ERM formation (present) (OR 0.384; 95% CI 0.179 to 0.821; p=0.0136) and horizontal VMT diameter (µm) (OR 0.99812; 95% CI 0.99684 to 0.99941, p=0.0042). A significant multivariable logistic regression model was established with age and VMT diameter. CONCLUSION: Known predictive factors for VMT resolution after ocriplasmin IVI were confirmed in our study. We were able to combine them into a formula, ultimately allowing the calculation of an individual probability of treatment success with ocriplasmin in patients with VMT syndrome without FTHM.

[Intraoperative Optical Coherence Tomography in Vitreoretinal Surgery: Clinical Experiences and Future Developments]. / Die intraoperative optische Kohärenztomografie in der Netzhaut-Glaskörper-Chirurgie. Aktuelle Erfahrungen und Ausblick auf künftige Entwicklungsschritte.

PURPOSE: High resolution optical coherence tomography (OCT) enables better visualization of ophthalmic microstructures than conventional imaging. When using an ophthalmic microscope, integrated optical coherence tomography (iOCT) high resolution real time visualization is possible. METHODS: We report on the first 110 patients operated on using a microscope integrated OCT (iOCT) during surgical procedures for the treatment of various posterior segment pathologies. RESULTS: Microstructural changes that appeared during surgery were depicted precisely by iOCT, and the morphology visualized before and after each surgical step was used to help deciding how to adapt the surgical flow. The iOCT data and real-time imaging of retinal anatomy gives the surgeon the possibility of deploying patient- and operation-specific interventional procedures. DISCUSSION: To date, iOCT is only available in standing microscopes with no measurement or tracking features. Moreover, metal instruments currently obscure the scanned images. In the future, non-metal, transparent instruments (OCT-friendly surgical tools), tracking features, an autofocus and higher resolution could enable full and immediate intraoperative SD-OCT diagnostics in real time.

The predictability of ocriplasmin treatment effects: is there consensus among retinal experts? Results from the EXPORT study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the agreement and predictability of ocriplasmin treatment effects among retinal experts (raters) by assessment of retinal imaging data of eyes treated for vitreomacular traction in nine different centers in Germany and Austria. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study. Combined confocal near-infrared scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography images (Spectralis® device, Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Germany) from 136 eyes of 135 subjects were reviewed by 14 raters using an internet-based grading database and a standardized questionnaire. In addition to the images taken within 2 days prior to treatment, age, gender, and lens status were disclosed to the raters. Treatment success was defined as a complete cleavage of the posterior vitreous cortex at day 28±5. Main outcome was the agreement and predictability among raters for assessment of treatment success. RESULTS: Raters generally accepted starting ocriplasmin treatment (chance for treatment success ≥ 1%) in 22.4 to 69.1% (median 53.2%) of eyes (moderate intra- and interrater agreements with kappa-values of 0.6 and 0.48). The likelihood for a high potential treatment success (equal or higher than 25%) was judged by the raters in 43.4% to 86.0% (median 62.6%) of eyes (moderate intra- and fair interrater agreements with kappa-values of 0.56 and 0.22). Allocating eyes for high potential treatment success overall increased the odds by 3.07, with odds ratios of single raters up to 4.06 to 6.16. CONCLUSIONS: These results underscore the importance of training health care providers in the evaluation of retinal imaging data and also to define characteristic morphological features better in the presence of vitreoretinal interface diseases. The better results of single raters in the predictability of treatment success by the allocation of eyes in the high-potential group indicates the high relevance of the meticulous analysis of retinal images.