Treatment of Trigger finger by ultrasound-guided needle release of a1 pulley: A series of 105 cases.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of A1 pulley release using the needle technique, under ultrasound guidance, in patients with symptomatic trigger finger. METHODS: All patients with symptomatic trigger finger underwent A1 pulley release using an intramuscular 21 gauge (G) needle. Quinnell grade (I-IV), Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder & Hand (QuickDASH) score (0-100) and pain score on a visual analog scale (VAS: 0-10mm) were recorded at inclusion. The primary endpoint was complete resolution of the trigger finger at 6 months. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients totaling 105 treated digits were included. Mean age was 63.3±10.7 years. Prior to treatment, mean VAS pain score was 5.8±2.6mm, and mean QuickDASH score was 44.3±19.1. At 6 months, disappearance of symptoms was achieved in 85 of 91 digits with follow-up (93.4%), and in 85.7% at 12 months. The absolute reduction in VAS pain and QuickDASH scores at 6 months was respectively 4.1±3.1 (P<0.001) and 36.1±20.7 (P<0.001), and 90% of patients reported being satisfied or very satisfied at 6 months. Long duration of symptoms was significantly associated with persistent trigger finger at 6 months after intervention. Complications were rare and minor. Tenosynovitis occurred in 5.7% of cases, for which a corticosteroid injection into the tendon sheath rapidly led to favorable resolution. CONCLUSION: Treatment of trigger finger by release of the A1 pulley under ultrasound guidance using the needle technique is a mildly invasive technique that yields rapid and effective symptom resolution with good tolerance up to 12 months.

Intra-articular injections of platelet-rich plasma in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a consensus statement from French-speaking experts.

PURPOSE: There has been much debate regarding the use of intra-articular injections of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as symptomatic treatment for knee osteoarthritis. The objective of this consensus was to develop guidelines for PRP injections in knee osteoarthritis according to the French National Authority for Health recommendations. METHODS: Fifteen physicians from different French-speaking countries (10 rheumatologists, 4 specialists in rehabilitation and sports medicine and 1 radiologist) were selected for their expertise in the areas of PRP and osteoarthritis. A comprehensive literature review was conducted on Medline including all published therapeutic trials, open studies, meta-analysis and systematic reviews focusing on the effects of PRP in knee OA, as well as fundamental studies concerning the characteristics of the various types of PRP and their mechanisms, indexed before April 2019. Using the method recommended by the French National Authority for Health inspired by the Delphi consensus process, 25 recommendations were finally retained and evaluated. The recommendations were classified as appropriate or not appropriate, with strong or relative agreement, or uncertain if a consensus was not achieved. RESULTS: Among the 25 recommendations selected, the main ones are the following: (1) Intra-articular injections of PRP are an effective symptomatic treatment for early to moderate knee osteoarthritis. This recommendation was considered appropriate with a relative agreement (Median = 8; rank = 6-9). Level of evidence 1A. (2) A PRP treatment sequence in knee osteoarthritis may include 1-3 injections. This recommendation was considered appropriate with a strong agreement (Median = 9; rank = 7-9). Level of evidence 1A. (3) Leucocytes-poor PRP should be preferred in knee osteoarthritis. This recommendation was considered appropriate with a relative agreement (Median = 8; rank = 5-9). Level of evidence 5. (4) Intra-articular PRP knee injections should be performed under ultrasound or fluoroscopic guidance. This recommendation was considered uncertain with no consensus (Median = 8; rank = 3-9). Level of evidence 5. (5) PRP should not be mixed with an anesthetic or intra-articular corticosteroid. This recommendation was considered appropriate with a relative agreement (Median = 9; rank = 6-9). Level of evidence 5 CONCLUSION: Those 25 recommendations should standardize and facilitate the use of IA PRP injections, which are considered by experts as an effective treatment especially in early or moderate knee OA. Although a strong or relative agreement from the experts was obtained for most of the recommendations, many of them had a very low level of evidence (Level 5) and were principally based on the clinical experience of the experts.

Recommendations of the French Society of Rheumatology on pharmacological treatment of knee osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To establish recommendations for pharmacological treatment of knee osteoarthritis specific to France. METHODS: On behalf of the French Society of Rheumatology (SFR), a bibliography group analyzed the literature on the efficacy and safety of each pharmacological treatment for knee osteoarthritis. This group joined a multidisciplinary working group to draw up recommendations. Strength of recommendation and quality of evidence level were assigned to each recommendation. A review committee gave its level of agreement. RESULTS: Five general principles were established: 1) need to combine pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments, 2) personalization of treatment, 3) symptomatic and/or functional aim of pharmacological treatments, 4) need to regularly re-assess the treatments and 5) discussion about arthroplasty if medical treatment fails. Six recommendations involved oral treatments: 1) paracetamol should not necessarily be prescribed systematically and/or continuously, 2) NSAIDs, possibly as first-line, 3) weak opioids, 4) strong opioids, 5) symptomatic slow-acting drugs of osteoarthritis, and 6) duloxetine (off-label use). Two recommendations involved topical agents (NSAIDs and capsaicin<1%). Three recommendations involved intra-articular treatments: corticosteroid or hyaluronic acid injections that can be proposed to patients. The experts did not draw a conclusion about the benefits of platelet-rich plasma injections. CONCLUSION: These are the first recommendations of the SFR on the pharmacological treatment of knee osteoarthritis.

Systemic inhibition of IL-6/Stat3 signalling protects against experimental osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of systemic inhibition of interleukin 6 (IL-6) or signal transducer and activator of transcription (Stat3) in an experimental model of osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: Expression of major catabolic and anabolic factors of cartilage was determined in IL-6-treated mouse chondrocytes and cartilage explants. The anti-IL-6-receptor neutralising antibody MR16-1 was used in the destabilisation of the medial meniscus (DMM) mouse model of OA. Stat3 blockade was investigated by the small molecule Stattic ex vivo and in the DMM model. RESULTS: In chondrocytes and cartilage explants, IL-6 treatment reduced proteoglycan content with increased production of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP-3 and MMP-13) and a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs (ADAMTS-4 and ADAMTS-5). IL-6 induced Stat3 and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) 1/2 signalling but not p38, c-Jun N-terminal kinase or Akt. In the DMM model, Stat3 was activated in cartilage, but neither in the synovium nor in the subchondral bone. Systemic blockade of IL-6 by MR16-1 alleviated DMM-induced OA cartilage lesions, impaired the osteophyte formation and the extent of synovitis. In the same model, Stattic had similar beneficial effects on cartilage and osteophyte formation. Stattic, but not an ERK1/2 inhibitor, significantly counteracted the catabolic effects of IL-6 on cartilage explants and suppressed the IL-6-induced chondrocytes apoptosis. CONCLUSION: IL-6 induces chondrocyte catabolism mainly via Stat3 signalling, a pathway activated in cartilage from joint subjected to DMM. Systemic blockade of IL-6 or STAT-3 can alleviate DMM-induced OA in mice.

Anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies (ASCA) in spondyloarthritis: Prevalence and associated phenotype.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare the prevalence of ASCA in spondyloarthrites (SpA) patients and to investigate the association between ASCA status and disease phenotype. METHODS: We performed a case-control study including SpA individuals fulfilling the ESSG SpA criteria. The following data were collected for analysis: gender, age, disease duration, clinical or associated features of SpA, treatments, HLAB27 and ASCA status. A control group of patients without SpA was also analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 235 patients with SpA and 54 control patients were studied. The median age of SpA patients (53.6% of male patients, 52.2% of HLAB27) was 46.0 [IQR 35.0-57.0] years old. Disease duration was 60.0 [IQR 24.0-156.0] months. Inflammatory bowel diseases were observed in 11% of SpA patients. ASCA positivity was significantly higher in SpA patients than in control patients (25.5% [95% CI 20.1-31.6] (IgG: 9.8%; IgA: 21.7%) vs. 7.4% [95% CI 2.1-17.9], P=0.004). Multivariate analysis revealed that ASCA positivity was associated with peripheral involvement (OR: 3.30 [1.26-8.62], P=0.015), presence of IBD (OR: 3.43 [1.15-10.20], P=0.026), past of present history of uveitis (OR: 4.36 [1.08-17.64], P=0.039) and arthritis (OR: 3.78 [1.57-9.15], P=0.003). CONCLUSION: Our results provided evidence that SpA patients had an increased prevalence of ASCA and that ASCA positivity might be associated with a particular phenotype, notably peripheral involvement and uveitis.