ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Recent guidelines on depressive disorders suggest a combination of antidepressants and psychotherapy in case of moderate to severe symptomatology. While cognitive behavioral therapy and interpersonal therapy are the most investigated interventions, psychodynamic psychotherapies have been less explored. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper is to systematically review literature data on the efficacy of shortterm psychodynamic psychotherapy (STPP) in combination with antidepressants in the treatment of depressive disorders, focusing both on short and on long-term results and on potential moderators that could influence its effectiveness. METHODS: The systematic review was conducted using the PRISMA guidelines. Databases searched were PubMed, Ovid, Scopus, and Cochrane Library, from inception to August 2023. RESULTS: Adding STPP to medications in the first six months of treatment didn't influence remission rates, but improved acceptability, work adjustment, interpersonal relationships, social role functioning, hospitalization rates and cost-effectiveness. After 12 months, a significant difference in remission rates arised, favouring combined therapy. In a long-term perspective, adding STPP to pharmacotherapy reduced the recurrence rate by almost 50%. STPP has proven to be more effective in longer depressive episodes, in more severe depressions and in patients with a childhood abuse history. Instead, STPP had no impact on major depressive disorder with comorbid Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD). CONCLUSIONS: Combining STPP with antidepressants appeared to be helpful both in a short-term and in a long-term perspective. Still, there are few rigorous studies with large samples and further research is needed to identify which subgroups of patients may benefit more from STPP.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Although an association has been found recently between obsessive-compulsive disorder and an increased risk of suicide, the prevalence of both suicidal ideation and attempts vary considerably and are generally assessed categorically. Our aims were to evaluate the prevalence of suicidal ideation and behaviors using a dimensional approach. Methods: The sample included 129 patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Suicidality was assessed by administering the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale. Logistic and linear regressions were used to examine predictors of suicidal ideation, severe suicidal ideation, and suicidal behavior. Results: The lifetime prevalence of suicidal ideation and behaviors were 64.3% and 16.3%, respectively. Lifetime suicidal ideation was associated with the number of stressful life events, duration of illness, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression scores, and family history of mood disorders. A family history of obsessive-compulsive disorder was associated with a lower probability of lifetime suicidal ideation. Severe suicidal ideation was related to greater severity of the most stressful life event, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression scores, and longer duration of untreated illness. The probability of lifetime suicidal behavior was related to Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety scores, symmetry obsessions, and washing and checking compulsions. The probability of lifetime non-suicidal self-injurious behaviors was related to Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety scores. Conclusions: Recognizing predictors of suicidal ideation/behavior is crucial to identifying patients at greater risk.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Although an association has been found recently between obsessive-compulsive disorder and an increased risk of suicide, the prevalence of both suicidal ideation and attempts vary considerably and are generally assessed categorically. Our aims were to evaluate the prevalence of suicidal ideation and behaviors using a dimensional approach. METHODS: The sample included 129 patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Suicidality was assessed by administering the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale. Logistic and linear regressions were used to examine predictors of suicidal ideation, severe suicidal ideation, and suicidal behavior. RESULTS: The lifetime prevalence of suicidal ideation and behaviors were 64.3% and 16.3%, respectively. Lifetime suicidal ideation was associated with the number of stressful life events, duration of illness, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression scores, and family history of mood disorders. A family history of obsessive-compulsive disorder was associated with a lower probability of lifetime suicidal ideation. Severe suicidal ideation was related to greater severity of the most stressful life event, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression scores, and longer duration of untreated illness. The probability of lifetime suicidal behavior was related to Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety scores, symmetry obsessions, and washing and checking compulsions. The probability of lifetime non-suicidal self-injurious behaviors was related to Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety scores. CONCLUSIONS: Recognizing predictors of suicidal ideation/behavior is crucial to identifying patients at greater risk.
Subject(s)
Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder , Suicide , Humans , Suicide, Attempted , Suicidal Ideation , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/epidemiology , AnxietyABSTRACT
Objective: To increase understanding of the influence of photoperiod variation in patients with bipolar disorders. Methods: We followed a sample of Italian bipolar patients over a period of 24 months, focusing on inpatients. All patients admitted to the Psychiatric Inpatient Unit of San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital in Orbassano (Turin, Italy) between September 1, 2013 and August 31, 2015 were recruited. Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected. Results: Seven hundred and thirty patients were included. The admission rate for bipolar patients was significantly higher during May, June and July, when there was maximum sunlight exposure, although no seasonal pattern was found. Patients with (hypo)manic episodes were admitted more frequently during the spring and during longer photoperiods than those with major depressive episodes. Conclusions: Photoperiod is a key element in bipolar disorder, not only as an environmental factor but also as an important clinical parameter that should be considered during treatment.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Seasons , Sunlight/adverse effects , Bipolar Disorder/etiology , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Photoperiod , Socioeconomic Factors , Sex Factors , Depressive Disorder, Major , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Italy , Mental Disorders/classification , Mental Disorders/etiology , Mental Disorders/psychologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To increase understanding of the influence of photoperiod variation in patients with bipolar disorders. METHODS: We followed a sample of Italian bipolar patients over a period of 24 months, focusing on inpatients. All patients admitted to the Psychiatric Inpatient Unit of San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital in Orbassano (Turin, Italy) between September 1, 2013 and August 31, 2015 were recruited. Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected. RESULTS: Seven hundred and thirty patients were included. The admission rate for bipolar patients was significantly higher during May, June and July, when there was maximum sunlight exposure, although no seasonal pattern was found. Patients with (hypo)manic episodes were admitted more frequently during the spring and during longer photoperiods than those with major depressive episodes. CONCLUSIONS: Photoperiod is a key element in bipolar disorder, not only as an environmental factor but also as an important clinical parameter that should be considered during treatment.
Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/etiology , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Photoperiod , Seasons , Sunlight/adverse effects , Adult , Depressive Disorder, Major , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Italy , Male , Mental Disorders/classification , Mental Disorders/etiology , Mental Disorders/psychology , Sex Factors , Socioeconomic FactorsABSTRACT
Introducción: El empleo de antidepresivos para el tratamiento de los pacientes con trastorno bipolar es discutido. A pesar de la falta de claridad respecto del papel de estos agentes, su administración en la práctica clínica es frecuente, ya sea como monoterapia o en combinación con estabilizadores del estado de ánimo. Hace tres años llevamos a cabo una revisión sobre este tema. Sin embargo, desde ese momento se publicó información adicional de importancia. Objetivo: Efectuar una actualización sobre el empleo de antidepresivos en pacientes con trastorno bipolar mediante la evaluación de toda la información relevante publicada luego de nuestra primera revisión. En el presente artículo analizamos todos los estudios aleatorizados y controlados o abiertos publicados desde agosto de 2007 hasta abril de 2010 donde se evaluó: 1) la eficacia de los antidepresivos en caso de depresión bipolar aguda, 2) el riesgo de viraje maníaco durante el tratamiento antidepresivo y 3) la interrupción de los antidepresivos una vez alcanzada la respuesta al tratamiento agudo. Resultados y discusión: Los hallazgos principales del presente artículo pueden resumirse de la siguiente manera. En primer lugar, algunos antidepresivos pueden ser beneficiosos para el tratamiento agudo de los pacientes con depresión bipolar, especialmente al ser combinados con estabilizadores del estado de ánimo. En segundo lugar, los antidepresivos se asocian con índices elevados de viraje maníaco solo en algunos casos: 1) cuando no se prescriben estabilizadores del estado de ánimo en forma concomitante, 2) cuando se emplean antidepresivos tricíclicos en lugar de antidepresivos de segunda generación y 3) en presencia de síntomas hipomaníacos, aunque sean leves.