Long-term safety and efficacy of emicizumab for up to 5.8 years and patients' perceptions of symptoms and daily life: A phase 1/2 study in patients with severe haemophilia A.

INTRODUCTION: Safety and efficacy results of the phase 1 study and phase 1/2 extension study of the bispecific antibody emicizumab in patients with severe haemophilia A with or without factor VIII inhibitors for up to 2.8 years were reported previously. AIM: To evaluate further longer-term data including patients' perceptions at study completion. METHODS: Emicizumab was administered subcutaneously once weekly at maintenance doses of 0.3, 1 or 3 mg/kg with potential up-titration. All patients were later switched to the approved maintenance dose of 1.5 mg/kg. RESULTS: Eighteen patients received emicizumab for up to 5.8 years. Most adverse events were mild and unrelated to emicizumab. Annualized bleeding rates (ABRs) for bleeds treated with coagulation factors decreased from pre-emicizumab rates or remained zero in all patients. The median ABRs were low at 1.25, 0.83 and 0.22 during the 0.3, 1 and 3 mg/kg dosing periods, respectively. Of 8 patients who decreased their doses from 3 to 1.5 mg/kg, ABRs decreased in 4, remained at zero in 2, and increased in 2. Total time spent with symptoms associated with treated bleeds decreased in all patients except 2. All patients answered 'improved' for bleeding severity and time until bleeding stops, except 1 answering 'slightly improved'. Most patients answered 'improved' or 'slightly improved'' for daily life and feelings; in particular, all patients except 1 answered 'improved' or 'slightly improved' for anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term emicizumab prophylaxis for up to 5.8 years was safe and efficacious, and may improve patients' daily lives and feelings, regardless of inhibitor status.

Safety and efficacy of various dosages of ocrelizumab in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to methotrexate therapy: a placebo-controlled double-blind parallel-group study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of ocrelizumab (OCR) in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX). METHODS: RA patients with an inadequate response to MTX 6-8 mg/week received an infusion of 50, 200, or 500 mg OCR or placebo on Days 1 and 15 and were observed for 24 weeks. The double-blind period was prematurely terminated because of a possible risk for serious infection from OCR. RESULTS: A total of 152 patients were randomized into the study. The incidence of infection was 37.7% (43/114) in the OCR groups combined, compared to 18.9% (7/37) in the placebo group. Serious infections occurred in 7 patients in the OCR groups combined; there were no serious infections in the placebo group. Among the serious infections, Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia occurred in 2 patients in the OCR 200 mg group. The American College of Rheumatology 20% response rates at Week 24 (the primary endpoint) of the OCR 50, 200, and 500 mg groups were 54.1% (p = 0.0080), 55.6% (p = 0.0056), and 47.2% (p = 0.044), respectively, all significantly higher than that of the placebo group (25.0%). CONCLUSION: These results suggest inappropriate benefit-risk balance of OCR in this patient population. Because rituximab is not approved for treatment of RA in Japan, it will be necessary to investigate safety and efficacy of other anti-B cell therapies in Japanese patients with RA. (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00779220).