Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Lancet Digit Health ; 3(11): e723-e732, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34580055

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: For people with type 1 diabetes, there is currently no automated insulin delivery system that does not require meal input. We aimed to assess the efficacy of a novel faster-acting insulin aspart (Fiasp) plus pramlintide fully closed-loop system that does not require meal input. METHODS: In this open-label, randomised controlled, crossover, non-inferiority trial we compared the Fiasp (Novo Nordisk, Bagsværd, Denmark) plus pramlintide closed-loop system with no meal input (fully artificial pancreas) and the Fiasp-alone closed-loop system with precise carbohydrate counting (hybrid artificial pancreas). Adults (≥18 years) who had a clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes for at least 12 months, had glycated haemoglobin 12% or lower, and had been on insulin pump therapy for at least 6 months were enrolled at McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada. The Fiasp plus pramlintide fully closed-loop system delivered pramlintide in a basal-bolus manner with a fixed ratio of 10 µg:U relative to insulin. A research staff member counted the carbohydrate content of meals to input in the hybrid closed-loop system. Participants completed the two full-day crossover interventions in a random order allocated by a computer-generated code implementing a blocked randomisation (block size of four). The primary outcome was the percentage of time spent within the glucose target range (3·9-10·0 mmol/L), with a 6% non-inferiority margin, assessed in all participants who completed both interventions. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03800875. FINDINGS: Between Feb 8, 2019, and Sept 19, 2020, we enrolled 28 adults, of whom 24 completed both interventions and were included in analyses. The percentage of time spent in the target range was 74·3% (IQR 61·5-82·8) with the fully closed-loop system versus 78·1% (66·3-87·5) with the hybrid Fiasp-alone closed-loop system (paired difference 2·6%, 95% CI -2·4 to 12·2; non-inferiority p=0·28). Eight (33%) participants had at least one hypoglycaemia event (<3·3 mmol/L) with the fully closed-loop system compared with 14 (58%) participants with the hybrid closed-loop system (2200-2200 h). Non-mild nausea was reported by three (13%) participants and non-mild bloating by one (4%) participant with the fully closed-loop system compared with zero participants with the hybrid closed-loop system. INTERPRETATION: The Fiasp plus pramlintide fully closed-loop system was not non-inferior to the Fiasp-alone hybrid closed-loop system for the overall percentage of time in the glucose target range. However, participants still spent a high percentage of time within the target range with the fully-closed loop system. Outpatient studies comparing the fully closed-loop hybrid systems with patient-estimated, rather than precise, carbohydrate counting are warranted. FUNDING: Diabetes Canada.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage , Insulin Infusion Systems , Insulin, Long-Acting/administration & dosage , Insulin/administration & dosage , Islet Amyloid Polypeptide/administration & dosage , Pancreas, Artificial , Adult , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Canada , Cross-Over Studies , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/blood , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Drug Combinations , Female , Glycated Hemoglobin/metabolism , Humans , Hypoglycemia/blood , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Insulin/therapeutic use , Insulin Infusion Systems/adverse effects , Insulin, Long-Acting/therapeutic use , Islet Amyloid Polypeptide/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
2.
Can J Diabetes ; 45(8): 734-742, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33888413

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: A fully automated insulin-pramlintide-glucagon artificial pancreas that alleviates the burden of carbohydrate counting without degrading glycemic control was iteratively enhanced until convergence through pilot experiments on adults with type 1 diabetes. METHODS: Nine participants (age, 37±13 years; glycated hemoglobin, 7.7±0.7%) completed two 27-hour interventions: a fully automated multihormone artificial pancreas and a comparator insulin-alone artificial pancreas with carbohydrate counting. The baseline algorithm was a model-predictive controller that administered insulin and pramlintide in a fixed ratio, with boluses triggered by a glucose threshold, and administered glucagon in response to low glucose levels. RESULTS: The baseline multihormone dosing algorithm resulted in noninferior time in target range (3.9 to 10.0 mmol/L) (71%) compared with the insulin-alone arm (70%) in 2 participants, with minimal glucagon delivery. The algorithm was modified to deliver insulin and pramlintide more aggressively to increase time in range and maximize the benefits of glucagon. The modified algorithm displayed a similar time in range for the multihormone arm (79%) compared with the insulin-alone arm (83%) in 2 participants, but with undesired glycemic fluctuations. Subsequently, we reduced the glucose threshold that triggers glucagon boluses. This resulted in inferior glycemic control for the multihormone arm (81% vs 91%) in 2 participants. Thereafter, a model-based meal-detection algorithm to deliver insulin and pramlintide boluses closer to mealtimes was added and glucagon was removed. The final dual-hormone system had comparable time in range (81% vs 83%) in the last 3 participants. CONCLUSION: The final version of the fully automated system that delivered insulin and pramlintide warrants a randomized controlled trial.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Pancreas, Artificial , Adult , Blood Glucose , Cross-Over Studies , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Insulin/therapeutic use , Insulin Infusion Systems , Middle Aged , Young Adult
3.
Mol Cell Biol ; 40(15)2020 07 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32366382

ABSTRACT

Rtf1 is a conserved RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) elongation factor that promotes cotranscriptional histone modification, RNAPII transcript elongation, and mRNA processing. Rtf1 function requires the phosphorylation of Spt5, an essential RNAPII processivity factor. Spt5 is phosphorylated within its C-terminal domain (CTD) by cyclin-dependent kinase 9 (Cdk9), the catalytic component of positive transcription elongation factor b (P-TEFb). Rtf1 recognizes phosphorylated Spt5 (pSpt5) through its Plus3 domain. Since Spt5 is a unique target of Cdk9 and Rtf1 is the only known pSpt5-binding factor, the Plus3/pSpt5 interaction is thought to be a key Cdk9-dependent event regulating RNAPII elongation. Here, we dissect Rtf1 regulation by pSpt5 in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe We demonstrate that the Plus3 domain of Rtf1 (Prf1 in S. pombe) and pSpt5 are functionally distinct and that they act in parallel to promote Prf1 function. This alternate Plus3 domain function involves an interface that overlaps the pSpt5-binding site and that can interact with single-stranded nucleic acid or with the polymerase-associated factor (PAF) complex in vitro We further show that the C-terminal region of Prf1, which also interacts with PAF, has a similar parallel function with pSpt5. Our results elucidate unexpected complexity underlying Cdk9-dependent pathways that regulate transcription elongation.


Subject(s)
Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/metabolism , Schizosaccharomyces pombe Proteins/metabolism , Schizosaccharomyces/metabolism , Transcriptional Elongation Factors/genetics , Phosphorylation , Positive Transcriptional Elongation Factor B/metabolism , RNA Polymerase II/metabolism , Transcription, Genetic/genetics , Transcriptional Elongation Factors/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...