ABSTRACT
An inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT), frequently misdiagnosed as a malignant neoplasm, is a rare tumor characterized by the presence of myofibroblastic spindle cells and infiltration of inflammatory cells. In the current study, a 49-year-old female patient with a huge abdominal mass in the left abdominal wall was examined. Diagnostic procedures included blood tests, as well as ultrasound, Doppler, and computed tomography (CT) scans, which revealed the presence of a huge complex multiloculated cystic lesion measuring 30 x 37 x 20 cm. The patient underwent complete excision of the mass. Histopathological examination confirmed the benign nature of the tumor and revealed no evidence of malignancy. A comprehensive review of the available literature shows that the current case is one of the few documented cases. The report concluded by emphasizing the importance of surgical intervention as the primary therapeutic strategy and the crucial role of histopathology in the diagnostic process.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Numerous factors can influence decisions regarding the type of delivery of human babies. There is an increasing demand for non-medically indicated cesarean sections (CS) (non-miCS) or CS on request (CSor). Therefore, this survey study aimed to identify the factors that may foster the decision of CS among obstetricians. METHODS: After the sample size calculation returned with 132 needed participants, confidence surveys were sent electronically or disseminated in paper form to nearly all obstetricians (around 200) in the province between mid-August 2021 and mid-February 2022. After signing the consent form, obstetricians were able to provide responses to the four sections of the questionnaire. Data from the copies of the paper were entered into Excel by a local data collector. The data analysis was done using Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS) (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Armonk, NY) and followed the following sequence: summary statistics were done first; then the groups (for and against non-miCS) were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA); and, finally, regression models were conducted to determine the factors that may affect the favorability of doing non-miCS. RESULTS: A total of 104 obstetricians responded to the survey. Approximately 62.5% of them performed CSor for women who requested it. In addition, more than half (57.7%) agreed that all women had the right and autonomy to choose their mode of delivery. Most providers (65.4) agreed that fear of vaginal delivery (VD) and a bad experience with it are rational reasons for performing a CSor. Unfortunately, some obstetricians (18.3%) faced lawsuits when they refused to perform CSor. As for the factors that may influence the acceptance of obstetricians to non-miCS, it was found that obstetricians who are unsure or refuse to answer (OR=4.30, 95%-CI 1.25-16.29, p=0.025), along with people who do not always perform CSor (OR=4.33, 95%-CI 1.59-12.50, p=0.005) or even refuse it (3.54, 95%-CI 1.05-12.96, p=0.046), are more likely to agree that women have the right to request CSor. CONCLUSION: The surge in CSor rates was mostly correlated with an attempt to escape the fear of VD. However, given the wide discrepancies in obstetricians' opinions in this survey, we cannot draw firm conclusions about the reasons behind this phenomenon. It is also important to explore possible ways to address the problem, such as through litigation with providers who refuse to perform a CSor and through economic reform to protect women from money-grubbing obstetricians.
