Two Phase 3 Studies on Ophthalmologic Effects of Roxadustat Versus Darbepoetin.

Introduction: Roxadustat is an orally administered hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor that represents a novel therapeutic option for patients with anemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Methods: Conducted in Japan, CL-0307 (NCT02952092) and CL-310 (NCT02988973) were phase 3, darbepoetin alfa (DA)-controlled studies conducted in dialysis-dependent (DD) and non-DD (NDD) patients with CKD, respectively, where patients were randomized to receive roxadustat or DA. Ophthalmic imaging and assessments of visual acuity were performed up to week 24 or at study discontinuation. Ophthalmic imaging was centrally evaluated by independent readers masked to the study treatment. Results: In CL-0307, 302 patients (roxadustat, n = 150; DA, n = 152) received ≥1 dose of the study drug and were included in this analysis. In CL-0310, 262 patients (roxadustat, n = 131; DA, n = 131) received ≥1 dose of the study drug and were included in this analysis. Proportions of DD patients with new or worsening retinal hemorrhages (RHs) in the roxadustat group and DA group were 32.4% (46 of 142) and 36.6% (53 of 145), respectively. Proportions of NDD patients with CKD with new or worsening RH in the roxadustat and DA groups were 31.4% (38 of 121) and 39.8% (51 of 128), respectively. Similar trends were apparent in subgroup analyses: patients with/without RH at baseline and with/without diabetes mellitus at baseline. In both studies, there were no differences in retinal thickness, visual acuity, presence of hard exudates or cotton wool spots, or presence of intra- and subretinal fluid between groups, at any given time point. Conclusion: In these studies, roxadustat, compared with DA, was not associated with an increased risk of adverse ophthalmologic events in these cohorts.

[Roxadustat (Evrenzo® tablet), a therapeutic drug for renal anemia: pharmacological characteristics and clinical evidence in Japan].

Roxadustat (Evrenzo® tablet) is an oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase (HIF-PH) inhibitor. Roxadustat has been approved for the treatment of renal anemia in patients on dialysis in September 2019 in Japan. By inhibiting HIF-PH, roxadustat suppresses the degradation of HIF-α, a subunit of the heterodimeric transcription factor HIF, leading to its accumulation and activation of the HIF pathway. Similar to activation of the HIF pathway in response to hypoxia, the production of endogenous erythropoietin is increased and erythropoiesis is stimulated. Moreover, roxadustat stimulates erythropoiesis efficiently by improving iron bioavailability. The efficacy and mechanism of action of roxadustat have been detailed in non-clinical pharmacology studies. Rat models of anemia demonstrated efficacy of roxadustat in correcting anemia and changes in gene expression leading to increased iron bioavailability. Four phase 3 clinical studies in Japan clearly demonstrated the efficacy of roxadustat in patients with renal anemia on dialysis. Roxadustat showed an acceptable safety profile, and the incidences and types of adverse events and serious adverse events reported in the clinical studies were similar with those predicted to occur in these patient population. Since roxadustat is an oral drug, concerns present with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) such as the risk of infection to the medical staff due to accidental needle-stick, pain during ESA injection in patients and burden on patients to visit a hospital, can be avoided or reduced. In November 2020, roxadustat has also been approved for the treatment of renal anemia in patients not on dialysis (data not shown in this article).

Factors affecting the doses of roxadustat vs darbepoetin alfa for anemia treatment in hemodialysis patients.

Roxadustat is an oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor for the treatment of anemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Emerging evidence suggests that roxadustat may be beneficial for patients who inadequately respond to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). This post-hoc analysis of a Japanese, double-blind, randomized, phase 3 study in hemodialysis-dependent CKD patients treated with traditional ESAs assessed the impact of factors associated with ESA hyporesponsiveness on roxadustat and darbepoetin alfa (DA) doses required to maintain target hemoglobin. Endpoints included mean of average doses of roxadustat and DA per administration in the last 6 weeks (AAD/6W) by prior ESA-resistance index (ERI), iron repletion (transferrin saturation; ferritin), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP). Of 415 enrolled patients, 303 were randomized (roxadustat, n = 151; DA, n = 152). Weight-adjusted AAD/6W increased with increasing ERI for roxadustat (ERI <3.3, 0.89 mg/kg; ERI ≥8.4, 1.51 mg/kg) and DA (ERI <3.3, 0.26 µg/kg; ERI ≥8.4, 0.91 µg/kg); the weight-adjusted AAD/6W relative to within-arm mean AAD/6W showed a trend toward increased DA doses for the ERI ≥8.4 category (P = .089). AAD/6W remained stable for roxadustat but increased for DA with decreasing baseline iron repletion markers. The relationship between roxadustat doses and end of treatment (EoT) hs-CRP was not significant (estimated slope, -0.494; P = .814); a trend toward increased DA doses was observed with increasing EoT hs-CRP (estimated slope, 2.973; P = .075). Roxadustat doses required to maintain target hemoglobin appear to be less affected by factors that underlie ESA hyporesponsiveness, relative to DA; roxadustat may be beneficial for patients hyporesponsive to ESAs.

Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Comparator (Darbepoetin Alfa) Study of Oral Roxadustat in CKD Patients with Anemia on Hemodialysis in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Roxadustat is an oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor approved in China for dialysis-dependent CKD anemia. METHODS: This phase 3, 24-week, double-blind, double-dummy study evaluated roxadustat's noninferiority to darbepoetin alfa for hemodialysis-dependent CKD anemia. We randomly assigned Japanese patients to oral roxadustat three times weekly or to darbepoetin alfa injections once weekly, titrating doses to maintain hemoglobin between 10-12 g/dl. The primary end point was change of average hemoglobin from baseline to weeks 18-24 (∆Hb18-24). Secondary end points were average hemoglobin and proportion of patients with hemoglobin between 10-12 g/dl (maintenance rate) at weeks 18-24, and iron parameters. Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events and adjudicated ophthalmologic findings. RESULTS: We randomly assigned 303 patients to roxadustat (n=151) or darbepoetin alfa (n=152). The difference between roxadustat and darbepoetin alfa in ∆Hb18-24 was -0.02 g/dl (95% confidence interval, -0.18 to 0.15), confirming roxadustat's noninferiority to darbepoetin alfa. Average hemoglobin at weeks 18-24 with roxadustat was 10.99 g/dl (95% confidence interval: 10.88 to 11.10), confirming its efficacy. Among patients with one or more hemoglobin value during weeks 18-24, the maintenance rate was 95.2% with roxadustat and 91.3% with darbepoetin alfa. Serum iron, ferritin, and transferrin saturation remained clinically stable with roxadustat; transferrin and total iron binding capacity increased through week 4 before stabilizing. Common treatment-emergent adverse events were nasopharyngitis, shunt stenosis, diarrhea, contusion, and vomiting. The proportion of patients with new or worsening retinal hemorrhage was 32.4% with roxadustat and 36.6% with darbepoetin alfa. We observed no clinically meaningful changes in retinal thickness groups. CONCLUSIONS: Roxadustat maintained hemoglobin within 10-12 g/dl in patients on hemodialysis and was noninferior to darbepoetin alfa. Treatment-emergent adverse events were consistent with previous reports. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER: A Study of Intermittent Oral Dosing of ASP1517 in Hemodialysis Chronic Kidney Disease Patients with Anemia, NCT02952092 (ClinicalTrials.gov).