Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis ; 24(2): 448-456, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33009489

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Precision medicine approaches for managing patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) are lacking. Non-invasive approaches for molecular monitoring of disease are urgently needed, especially for patients suffering from bone metastases for whom tissue biopsy is challenging. Here we utilized baseline blood samples to identify mCRPC patients most likely to benefit from abiraterone plus prednisone (AAP) or enzalutamide. METHODS: Baseline blood samples were collected for circulating tumor cell (CTC) enumeration and qPCR-based gene expression analysis from 51 men with mCRPC beginning treatment with abiraterone or enzalutamide. RESULTS: Of 51 patients (median age 68 years [51-82]), 22 received AAP (abiraterone 1000 mg/day plus prednisone 10 mg/day) and 29 received enzalutamide (160 mg/day). The cohort was randomly divided into training (n = 37) and test (n = 14) sets. Baseline clinical variables (Gleason score, PSA, testosterone, and hemoglobin), CTC count, and qPCR-based gene expression data for 141 genes/isoforms in CTC-enriched blood were analyzed with respect to overall survival (OS). Genes with expression most associated with OS included MSLN, ARG2, FGF8, KLK3, ESRP2, NPR3, CCND1, and WNT5A. Using a Cox-elastic net model for our test set, the 8-gene expression signature had a c-index of 0.87 (95% CI [0.80, 0.94]) and was more strongly associated with OS than clinical variables or CTC count alone, or a combination of the three variables. For patients with a low-risk vs. high-risk gene expression signature, median OS was not reached vs. 18 months, respectively (HR 5.32 [1.91-14.80], p = 0.001). For the subset of 41 patients for whom progression-free survival (PFS) data was available, the median PFS for patients with a low-risk vs high-risk gene expression signature was 20 vs. 5 months, respectively (HR 2.95 [1.46-5.98], p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: If validated in a larger prospective study, this test may predict patients most likely to benefit from second-generation antiandrogen therapy.


Subject(s)
Androstenes/therapeutic use , Benzamides/therapeutic use , Bone Neoplasms/secondary , Neoplastic Cells, Circulating/pathology , Nitriles/therapeutic use , Phenylthiohydantoin/therapeutic use , Prednisone/therapeutic use , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/pathology , Transcriptome , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Bone Neoplasms/blood , Bone Neoplasms/drug therapy , Bone Neoplasms/genetics , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplastic Cells, Circulating/metabolism , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/genetics , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...