Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
J Pediatr Surg ; 2024 Apr 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38735807

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Gastrostomy insertion is one of the most frequently performed procedures by specialist paediatric surgeons. We aimed to determine practice across the United Kingdom (UK) and in particular to identify areas where there was consistency or variation in practice between practitioners and centres. METHODS: A structured survey was distributed to all consultant practitioners who insert gastrostomies in the UK. Practice surrounding a range of aspects of gastrostomy care including insertion technique, device use, post-operative management and subsequent care were determined. RESULTS: Of total 135 practitioners who insert gastrostomies, responses were received from 103 (76%) with responses received from all UK centres. There was variation between centres in the provision of pre-operative information, and between practitioners in preferred device, insertion techniques, post-operative feeding practice and change/removal procedures. The most frequently preferred device for primary gastrostomy insertion was a Freka® PEG (36%) button device (30%), CorFlo™ PEG (21%), or G-tube (10%). Laparoscopy was always used when inserting either PEG or button device by over 50% of respondents and selectively used by the majority of the remainder. Feeds were started between 1 and 24 h post-insertion, most practitioners (64%) plan a minimum one night hospital stay but a third plan for more than one night. CONCLUSION: There is considerable variation in practice for most stages of the pathway for children having a gastrostomy. Further work is warranted to understand the relationship between different practices and patient outcomes, resource use and cost and subsequently to develop best practice guidelines.

2.
Qual Life Res ; 32(10): 2987-2999, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37286916

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We conducted a health economic sub-study within a feasibility RCT comparing a non-operative treatment pathway as an alternative to appendicectomy for the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis in children. The objectives were to understand and assess data collection tools and methods and to determine indicative costs and benefits assessing the feasibility of conducting a full economic evaluation within the definitive trial. METHODS: We compared different methods of estimating treatment costs including micro-costing, hospital administrative data (PLICS) and health system (NHS) reference costs. We compared two different HRQoL instruments (CHU-9D and EQ-5D-5L) in terms of data completeness and sensitivity to change over time, including potential ceiling effects. We also explored how the timing of data collection and duration of the analysis could affect QALYs (Quality Adjusted Life Years) and the results of the cost-utility analysis (CUA) within the future RCT. RESULTS: Using a micro-costing approach, the total per treatment costs were in alignment with hospital administrative data (PLICS). Average health system reference cost data (macro-costing using NHS costs) could potentially underestimate these treatment costs, particularly for non-operative treatment. Costs incurred following hospital discharge in the primary care setting were minimal, and limited family borne costs were reported by parents/carers. While both HRQoL instruments performed relatively well, our results highlight the problem of ceiling effect and the importance of the timing of data collection and the duration of the analysis in any future assessment using QALYs and CUA. CONCLUSIONS: We highlighted the importance of obtaining accurate individual-patient cost data when conducting economic evaluations. Our results suggest that timing of data collection and duration of the assessment are important considerations when evaluating cost-effectiveness and reporting cost per QALY. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN15830435.


Subject(s)
Appendicitis , Humans , Child , Appendicitis/surgery , Quality of Life/psychology , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Health Care Costs , Cost-Effectiveness Analysis , Quality-Adjusted Life Years
3.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 8102, 2021 04 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33854100

ABSTRACT

Among non-human mammals, exposure to androgens during critical periods of development leads to gynephilia (attraction to females), whereas the absence or low levels of prenatal androgens leads to androphilia (attraction to males). However, in humans, retrospective markers of prenatal androgens have only been associated with gynephilia among women, but not with androphilia among men. Here, we asked whether an indirect indication of prenatal androgen exposure, 2D:4D, differs between subsets of gay men delineated by anal sex role (ASR). ASR was used as a proxy for subgroups because ASR groups tend to differ in other measures affected by brain sexual differentiation, such as gender conformity. First, we replicated the finding that gay men with a receptive ASR preference (bottoms) report greater gender nonconformity (GNC) compared to gay men with an insertive ASR preference (tops). We then found that Tops have a lower (male-typical) average right-hand digit ratio than Bottoms, and that among all gay men the right-hand 2D:4D correlated with GNC, indicating that a higher (female-typical) 2D:4D is associated with increased GNC. Differences were found between non-exclusive and exclusive same-sex attraction and GNC, and ASR group differences on digit ratios do not reach significance when all non-heterosexual men are included in the analyses, suggesting greater heterogeneity in the development of non-exclusive same-sex sexual orientations. Overall, results support a role for prenatal androgens, as approximated by digit ratios, in influencing the sexual orientation and GNC of a subset of gay men.


Subject(s)
Androgens/physiology , Fingers/anatomy & histology , Homosexuality, Male/psychology , Sexual Behavior , Adult , Female , Gender Identity , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pregnancy , Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects , Retrospective Studies , Sex Characteristics , Sex Differentiation
5.
Front Behav Neurosci ; 14: 606788, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33551763

ABSTRACT

Genetic disruption of the vomeronasal organ (VNO), an organ responsible for pheromone processing, drastically alters socio-sexual behavior in mice. However, it is not known whether the VNO has a role during the pubertal organizational period when sex-typical socio-sexual behaviors emerge, or if disruption of the organ in adulthood is sufficient to alter socio-sexual behavior. To bypass the lifelong VNO disruption of genetic knockout models, we surgically ablated the VNO of male and female mice either during the peripubertal period [postnatal day (PND) 28-30] or adulthood (PND 58-60), with sham controls at both ages. We ruled out anosmia via the buried food test and assessed sexual odor preferences by simultaneously exposing mice to same- and opposite-sex soiled-bedding. We then measured territorial aggression with the resident-intruder paradigm and assessed sexual behavior in response to an encounter with an estrus-induced female. Neural activity approximated by FOS-immunoreactivity along the VNO-accessory olfactory pathway was measured in response to opposite-sex odors. We found that peripubertal VNO ablation decreased sexual odor preferences and neural activity in response to opposite-sex odors, and drastically reduced territorial aggression in male mice. Conversely, adult VNO ablation resulted in subtle differences in sexual odor preferences compared with sham controls. Regardless of the VNO condition, mice displayed sex-typical copulatory behaviors. Together, these results suggest that puberty is a critical period in development whereby the VNO contributes to the sexual differentiation of behavior and neural response to conspecific odors.

6.
J Pediatr Surg ; 52(7): 1108-1112, 2017 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28292594

ABSTRACT

AIMS: The optimal management for boys under 3 months of age with an indirect inguinal hernia (IIH) and ipsilateral palpable undescended testis (IPUDT) is unknown. We aimed to: 1) determine the current practice for managing these boys across the UK, and 2) compare outcomes of different treatment strategies. METHODOLOGY: We undertook two studies. Firstly, we completed a National Survey of all surgeons on the British Association of Paediatric Surgeons email list in 2014. Subsequently, we undertook a multi-centre, retrospective, 10-year (2005-2015) review across 4 pediatric surgery centers of boys under 3months of age with concomitant IIH and IPUDT. Primary outcome was testicular atrophy. Secondary outcomes included need for subsequent orchidopexy, testicular ascent and hernia recurrence. Data are presented as median (range). Chi-squared test and multivariate binomial logistic regression analysis were used for analysis; p<0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Survey: Consultant practice varies widely across the UK, with a tendency towards performing concurrent orchidopexy at the time of herniotomy under 3 months of age. Concurrent orchidopexy is favored less in cases where the hernia is symptomatic. Case Series Review: Forty-one boys with 43 concomitant IIH and IPUDT were identified, and all included. 32 (74%) hernias were reducible, 11 (26%) were symptomatic requiring urgent or emergency repair. Post-conceptual age at surgery was 45weeks (36-65). Primary operations included: 29 (67%) open hernia repair and standard orchidopexy, 8 (19%) open hernia repair with future orchidopexy if required, 4 (9%) laparoscopic hernia repair with future orchidopexy if required, 2 (5%) open hernia repair and suturing of the testis to the inverted scrotum without scrotal incision. Variation in atrophy rate between different surgical approaches did not reach statistical significance (p=0.42). Overall atrophy rate was 18%. If hernia repair alone was undertaken (8 open and 4 laparoscopic), the testis did not descend in 8 patients, requiring subsequent orchidopexy (67%); if orchidopexy was undertaken at the time of hernia repair, 1 in 29 required a repeat orchidopexy (3%) (p=0.0001). No hernia recurred. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that orchidopexy at the time of inguinal herniotomy does not increase the risk of testicular atrophy in boys under 3months of age.


Subject(s)
Cryptorchidism/surgery , Hernia, Inguinal/surgery , Herniorrhaphy/statistics & numerical data , Orchiopexy/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Cryptorchidism/complications , Follow-Up Studies , Health Care Surveys , Hernia, Inguinal/complications , Herniorrhaphy/methods , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Laparoscopy , Logistic Models , Male , Orchiopexy/methods , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , United Kingdom
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...