Phase 3 RCT comparing docetaxel-platinum with docetaxel-platinum-5FU as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in borderline resectable oral cancer.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with TPF (docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5FU) is one of the treatment options in very locally advanced oral cancer with a survival advantage over PF (cisplatin and 5FU). TP (docetaxel and cisplatin) has shown promising results with a lower rate of adverse events but has never been compared to TPF. METHODS: In this phase 3 randomized superiority study, adult patients with borderline resectable locally advanced oral cancers were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to either TP or TPF. After the administration of 2 cycles, patients were evaluated in a multidisciplinary clinic and further treatment was planned. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events. RESULTS: 495 patients were randomized in this study, 248 patients in TP arm and 247 in TPF arm. The 5-year OS was 18.5% (95% CI 13.8-23.7) and 23.9% (95% CI 18.1-30.1) in TP and TPF arms, respectively (Hazard ratio 0.778; 95% CI 0.637-0.952; P = 0.015). Following NACT, 43.8% were deemed resectable, but 34.5% underwent surgery. The 5-year OS was 50.7% (95% CI 41.5-59.1) and 5% (95%CI 2.9-8.1), respectively, in the surgically resected versus unresected cohort post NACT (P < 0.0001). Grade 3 or above adverse events were seen in 97 (39.1%) and 179 (72.5%) patients in the TP and TPF arms, respectively (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: NACT with TPF has a survival benefit over TP in borderline resectable oral cancers, with an increase in toxicity which is manageable. Patients who undergo surgery achieve a relatively good, sustained survival.

A phase II study to evaluate the efficacy of low-dose rasburicase (1.5mg) in adolescent and adult acute leukemia and high-grade lymphomas with tumor lysis syndrome.

The FDA recommended dose of rasburicase 0.2 mg/kg/day till the resolution of TLS or up to 5 days, might be in excess and is prohibitively expensive. The quality of evidence supporting low dose rasburicase is limited. The objective is to study the plasma uric acid response rate. This is a single center, non-randomised phase II study. Duration is 10 June 2017 till 30 July 2019. Study setting is at Adult Hematolymphoid Unit, Tata Memorial Center. Participants are patients with acute leukemia and high-grade lymphomas aged >/=18 years, with ECOG PS of 0-3, with either laboratory or clinical TLS. Rasburicase was administered at fixed-dose of 1.5 mg. The subsequent doses (1.5 mg each dose) were administered only if plasma UA levels did not decline by >50% on day 2, at the physician's discretion. We demonstrate that a low-dose rasburicase strategy leads to rapid and sustained reductions of uric acid in about 52% patients.

Low-cost oral metronomic chemotherapy versus intravenous cisplatin in patients with recurrent, metastatic, inoperable head and neck carcinoma: an open-label, parallel-group, non-inferiority, randomised, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Regimens for palliation in patients with head and neck cancer recommended by the US National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) have low applicability (less than 1-3%) in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) because of their cost. In a previous phase 2 study, patients with head and neck cancer who received metronomic chemotherapy had better outcomes when compared with those who received intravenous cisplatin, which is commonly used as the standard of care in LMICs. We aimed to do a phase 3 study to substantiate these findings. METHODS: We did an open-label, parallel-group, non-inferiority, randomised, phase 3 trial at the Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Center, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India. We enrolled adult patients (aged 18-70 years) who planned to receive palliative systemic treatment for relapsed, recurrent, or newly diagnosed squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, and who had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0-1 and measurable disease, as defined by the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors. We randomly assigned (1:1) participants to receive either oral metronomic chemotherapy, consisting of 15 mg/m2 methotrexate once per week plus 200 mg celecoxib twice per day until disease progression or until the development of intolerable side-effects, or 75 mg/m2 intravenous cisplatin once every 3 weeks for six cycles. Randomisation was done by use of a computer-generated randomisation sequence, with a block size of four, and patients were stratified by primary tumour site and previous cancer-directed treatment. The primary endpoint was median overall survival. Assuming that 6-month overall survival in the intravenous cisplatin group would be 40%, a non-inferiority margin of 13% was defined. Both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were done. All patients who completed at least one cycle of the assigned treatment were included in the safety analysis. This trial is registered with the Clinical Trials Registry-India, CTRI/2015/11/006388, and is completed. FINDINGS: Between May 16, 2016, and Jan 17, 2020, 422 patients were randomly assigned: 213 to the oral metronomic chemotherapy group and 209 to the intravenous cisplatin group. All 422 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis, and 418 patients (211 in the oral metronomic chemotherapy group and 207 in the intravenous cisplatin group) were included in the per-protocol analysis. At a median follow-up of 15·73 months, median overall survival in the intention-to-treat analysis population was 7·5 months (IQR 4·6-12·6) in the oral metronomic chemotherapy group compared with 6·1 months (3·2-9·6) in the intravenous cisplatin group (unadjusted HR for death 0·773 [95% CI 0·615-0·97, p=0·026]). In the per-protocol analysis population, median overall survival was 7·5 months (4·7-12·8) in the oral metronomic chemotherapy group and 6·1 months (3·4-9·6) in the intravenous cisplatin group (unadjusted HR for death 0·775 [95% CI 0·616-0·974, p=0·029]). Grade 3 or higher adverse events were observed in 37 (19%) of 196 patients in the oral metronomic chemotherapy group versus 61 (30%) of 202 patients in the intravenous cisplatin group (p=0·01). INTERPRETATION: Oral metronomic chemotherapy is non-inferior to intravenous cisplatin with respect to overall survival in head and neck cancer in the palliative setting, and is associated with fewer adverse events. It therefore represents a new alternative standard of care if current NCCN-approved options for palliative therapy are not feasible. FUNDING: Tata Memorial Center Research Administration Council. TRANSLATIONS: For the Hindi, Marathi, Gujarati, Kannada, Malayalam, Telugu, Oriya, Bengali, and Punjabi translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Clinico-pathological correlates and survival outcomes in 214 resected ampullary adenocarcinomas - are outcomes different in intestinal and pancreatobiliary subtypes with adjuvant gemcitabine?

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that intestinal type (IT) and pancreatobiliary (PB) subtypes of ampullary adenocarcinoma (AC) may have different outcomes. The current study evaluated differences in outcomes between these subtypes and the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (AT). METHODS: A prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent upfront resection for AC from January 2012 to March 2016 was conducted. A dedicated pathologist reported differentiation between IT and PB subtypes. RESULTS: 214 patients were included for analysis: 105 PB subtype and 109 IT subtype. With a median follow up of 46.3 months, estimated 4 year overall survival (OS) was 65.8%. In patients with stage II-III disease, lymph-node ratio (LNR) < 0.2 [Not reached (NR) vs. 30.72 months; p = 0.002], absence of perineural invasion (PNI) (NR vs. 31.61 months; p = 0.032) and AT (gemcitabine - 96.1%) (NR vs. 22.28 months) were prognostic for superior OS. There was no difference in OS between IT and PB subtypes, but both subtypes with stage II-III disease benefitted from AT statistically as compared to observation (IT: NR vs. 28.62 months; PB: 18.46 months vs. 58.09 months; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: AC-IT and AC-PB did not have a different OS when treated with resection and adjuvant gemcitabine, though adjuvant therapy benefitted both subtypes individually.

Phase III Non-inferiority Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of Low Dose Gemcitabine Compared to Standard Dose Gemcitabine With Platinum in Advanced Squamous Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Prolonged infusion of low dose gemcitabine (PLDG) in combination with platinum has shown promising activity in terms of improved response rate and progression free survival (PFS); especially in squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Hence, we conducted a phase 3 randomized non-inferiority study with the primary objective of comparing the overall survival (OS) between PLDG and standard dose of gemcitabine with platinum. METHODOLOGY: Adult subjects (age ≥ 18 years), with stages IIIB-IV, NSCLC (squamous) and ECOG performance status of ≤ 2 were randomized 1:1 into either carboplatin with standard dose gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 intravenous over 30 min, days 1 and 8) (STD-G arm) or carboplatin along with low dose gemcitabine (250 mg/m2 intravenous over 6 h, days 1 and 8) (LOW-G arm) for a maximum of 6 cycles. Tumor response was assessed by RECIST criteria version 1.1 every 2 cycles till 6th cycle and thereafter at 2 monthly intervals till progression. The primary endpoint was overall survival. 308 patients were randomized, 155 in STD-G arm and 153 in LOW-G arm, respectively. RESULTS: The median overall survival in STD-G arm was 6.8 months (95%CI 5.3-8.5) versus 8.4 months (95%CI 7-10.3) in the LOW-G arm (HR-0.890 (90%CI 0.725-1.092). The results with per protocol analysis were in line with these results. There was no statistical difference in progression free survival (HR-0.949; 90%CI 0.867-1.280) and adverse event rate between the 2 arms. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that PLDG is an alternative to the standard gemcitabine schedule in squamous NSCLC, and either of these can be selected subject to patient convenience.

Gemcitabine-cisplatin (GC) as adjuvant chemotherapy in resected stage II and stage III gallbladder cancers (GBC): a potential way forward.

Data on adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine-cisplatin (GC) in resected gallbladder cancers (GBC) are scarce. Patients who underwent upfront curative resection for GBC from 2010 to 2016 were analyzed. Patients with stage II-III GBC treated with adjuvant GC were analyzed. A total of 242 patients were evaluated, of whom 125 patients received GC regimen as adjuvant chemotherapy. The median age was 50 years (range 31-74), majority were female (77.6%), and 37 patients (29.6%) had raised CA 19.9 levels at baseline. One hundred and thirteen patients (90.4%) underwent radical cholecystectomy with R0 resections. Median number of GC administered was 6, with completion rates of 84%. Toxicity data were comprehensively available for 110 patients, with common grade 3 and grade 4 being neutropenia (9.9%), fatigue (7.3%) and febrile neutropenia (3.6%), respectively. With a median follow-up of 36.88 months, 3-year RFS was 60.3%. Patients with stage II (28%; n = 35), stage IIIA (28%; n = 35) and stage IIIB GBC (44%; n = 55) had a 3-year OS of 91.9, 67 and 58.1% (p = 0.001), respectively. Patients with stage II-III GBC undergoing R0 resections receiving adjuvant GC have good tolerance, high completion rates and encouraging outcomes in a non-trial high GBC prevalence scenario.

Intra-aural Route of Insecticide Poisoning.

Organophosphate (OP) compounds are commonly ingested with the intention of deliberate self-harm. Parenteral route of OP compound exposure is an uncommon yet significant source of toxicity. Deliberate injections via intravenous, intramuscular, and subcutaneous routes and accidental dermal absorption due to occupational exposure have been described earlier. We report an unusual case of intentional insecticide poisoning by pouring the OP compound into both ears. This was successfully treated with aural irrigation using normal saline and prompt administration of the antidote.