ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To determine the association between suprarenal aortic diameters and complications that may be attributed to a dilating phenotype following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. DESIGN: This study is a retrospective review. METHODS: We measured the abdominal aortas of 147 consecutive patients with a mean age of 78.5 (range 60-93) years, who had a mean Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) follow-up of 3 years (6 months to 8 years) at a public Hospital. Aortic calibres measured 5 mm above the highest renal artery were recorded, patients were categorised according to suprarenal diameter; Group A: greater than 25 mm, Group B: less than or equal to 25 mm. Stent migration, aneurysmal sac growth, presence of an endoleak and its type, occlusion events, rupture, interventions and mortality, as well as clinical history and demographic data were compared between groups. RESULTS: There was a significantly higher occurrence of stent migration (11% v 0%; P = .01) in patients with larger suprarenal aortas (Group A). The occurrence of any endoleak did not differ between the groups, however, significantly more complications resulting in secondary intervention, excluding occlusions, were noted in Group A (34% vs 17%, P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: The results from this study suggest that patients with above-average suprarenal diameters (categorised as dilators) may have a higher occurrence of specific complications following EVAR. A more detailed study to establish the association of suprarenal calibre with types of complications following EVAR is warranted.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Aorto-oesophageal fistula is a rare but life threatening cause of upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Severity of presentation and complexity of subsequent management depends on the size of the defect on both the aortic side and oesophagus. REPORT: The patient was a 67 year old Chinese man, who presented initially with a Stanford type A dissection with caudal extension to the right common iliac artery. The patient underwent replacement of the ascending aorta and proximal arch with debranching of the right innominate artery and aortic valve replacement. A follow up computed tomography (CT) aortogram done in the post-operative period showed a stable appearance of the caudal extension of the aortic dissection. The patient was discharged with a plan for future stenting of the thoracic aorta. Three weeks later the patient re-presented with an upper gastrointestinal bleed from an aorto-oesophageal fistula. The patient underwent endovascular stenting of the descending aorta for management of the fistula. Repeat oesophagogastroduodenoscopy showed a small erosion 35 cm from the incisors where the previous bleeding site had been. No further bleeding was seen. DISCUSSION: The patient recovered uneventfully after the procedure. Follow up CT aortogram done at 6 weeks demonstrated thrombosis of the false lumen of the descending thoracic aorta. Aorto-oesophageal fistula related to chronic type B aortic dissection is an extremely rare clinical entity and presents a challenge to the treating surgeon. This case demonstrates that selected cases can be judiciously managed by thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair alone.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Ankle-brachial index (ABI) and pulse volume recordings (PVR) are non-invasive tests used in diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). The Dopplex Ability is an automated ABI/PVR device utilising air plethysmography, offering easy and rapid PAD diagnosis. The accuracy and repeatability of the Dopplex were assessed in comparison to the Doppler/air plethysmography-based Parks Flo-Lab system. METHODS: Sixty-six patients (n = 129 lower limbs) were assessed with both Dopplex and Parks systems. For Dopplex ABI and PVR to be deemed accurate, it had to be within ±10% of the Parks ABI, and the PVR grade (1-4) had to be equal. The coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated from three repeat ABI/PVR readings to assess repeatability. RESULTS: The Dopplex and Parks devices correlated poorly for ABI (R2 = 0.17) with only 43% of ABIs and 69% of PVRs meeting the accuracy criteria compared to the Parks values. The specificity and sensitivity were 56% and 82%, respectively for ABI, and 91% and 89%, respectively for PVRs. The Dopplex showed a significantly higher CV for both ABIs and PVRs compared to the Parks. CONCLUSION: We found the Dopplex device to demonstrate suboptimal accuracy and repeatability in assessing ABI/PVR, and it was deemed unsuitable for use in our community.
