Risk of major birth defects after first-trimester exposure to carbocisteine and ambroxol: A multicenter prospective cohort study using counseling data for drug safety during pregnancy.

To assess the risk of major birth defects after first-trimester exposure to carbocisteine and ambroxol during pregnancy, we conducted a prospective cohort study using counseling data for drug use during pregnancy provided by the Japan Drug Information Institute in Pregnancy and Toranomon Hospital. Counseling information, including drug usage and participants' demographic information, was collected between April 1988 and December 2017. Pregnancy outcome data, including major birth defects, were obtained using a questionnaire administered 1 month after delivery. The risks of major birth defects after first-trimester exposure to carbocisteine (n = 588) and ambroxol (n = 341) were compared with those of nonteratogenic drug use during the first trimester (n = 1525). The adjusted odds ratio (aORs) for major birth defects was calculated using a multiple logistic regression analysis adjusted for confounders. The incidence of major birth defects was 1.2% (7/588) and 2.1% (7/341) in the carbocisteine and ambroxol groups, respectively, which was comparable to the control group (26/1525, 1.7%). Results of multiple logistic regression demonstrated similar nonsignificant risks for both carbocisteine (aOR: 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40-1.1, p = 0.11) and ambroxol (aOR: 1.1, 95% CI: 0.18-7.2, p = 0.88). No specific major birth defects were reported in the carbocisteine or ambroxol groups. This study demonstrated that carbocisteine and ambroxol exposure during the first trimester was not associated with an increased risk of major birth defects. These results could help in counseling for the use of these drugs during pregnancy and further alleviate anxiety in patients.

Identification of Prescribing Patterns in Hemodialysis Outpatients Taking Multiple Medications.

We investigated the relationship between multidrug administration and the characteristics, pathophysiology, and drug class in outpatients with hemodialysis. A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at Saitama Medical University Hospital in October 2018. Multidrug administration was defined as receiving either more than six drugs or more than the median number of drugs. The drugs used were represented by their anatomical classification codes in the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemistry Classification System (ATC classification). A latent class analysis (LCA) was used to identify clusters at risk of receiving multiple medications. A stepwise logistic regression analysis was performed to select ATC classifications prone to being involved in multidrug administration. As of October 2018, 98 outpatients with hemodialysis were enrolled in the study. In the LCA, when diabetes was the main primary disease, oral hypoglycemic agents available to dialysis patients were limited, but the number of drugs administered was large. Old age, poor nourishment, a long history of dialysis, and chronic nephritis were associated with multidrug administration among nondiabetic patients. In the second level of the ATC classification, the drugs frequently used were coded A02 (drugs for acid-related disorders), A07 (antidiarrheal agents, intestinal anti-inflammatory/anti-infective agents), B01 (antithrombotic agents), and N05 (psycholeptics). The prescribing patterns for either diabetic patients or nondiabetic elderly patients were identified in outpatients with hemodialysis taking multiple medications, and drugs for acid-related disorders, antidiarrheal agents, intestinal anti-inflammatory/anti-infective agents, antithrombotic agents, and psycholeptics are frequently used in those patients.

Usefulness of Implementing Comprehensive Pharmaceutical Care for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Outpatients Treated with Pazopanib.

BACKGROUND: Pazopanib is an effective treatment option for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, the therapy is often limited by the appearance of adverse events (AEs), including nausea/vomiting, hepatic impairment, hand-foot syndrome, diarrhea, hypertension and oral mucositis. Early management of AEs is, therefore, extremely important in order to maximize treatment outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This non-randomized controlled before-and-after study was carried out to evaluate the effectiveness of our comprehensive pharmaceutical interventions in 37 outpatients receiving pazopanib for RCC (experimental group). Data were compared with those obtained from 13 patients before the start of pharmaceutical intervention (control group). RESULTS: The incidence rates of grade 2 or more nausea and anorexia were significantly lower in the experimental, than in the control group (3% versus 38% for nausea, respectively, p=0.003; 8% versus 46% for anorexia, respectively, p=0.005). Importantly, non-adherence based on patient self-assessment was not observed with intervention (0% versus 38%, p<0.001). Consequently, the median total dose of pazopanib was increased by the intervention (72,600 versus 18,200 mg, p=0.002). Moreover, the median time to treatment failure was significantly longer with intervention than before (10.2 versus 1.7 months, HR=0.23, 95% CI=0.110-0.499, p<0.001). These findings suggest that our interventions are highly effective for enhancing treatment outcomes.