ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A current implant body surface was treated with "rough processing" by sandblasting and acid etching for the purposes of obtaining more reliable osseointegration and shortening the treatment period. Various reports have examined the healing period with the use of these implant bodies, but a consensus opinion has not yet been obtained. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the relationship between insertion torque (IT) and implant stability quotient (ISQ) at implant treatment using the current rough-surfaced implant. We evaluated the implant treatment sites with ISQ values, IT values, and voxel values. METHODS: Participants in this study comprised 26 patients (10 males, 16 females; mean age, 55.5 years) who received posterior region dental implants at Tokyo Dental College Hospital or Fukuoka Dental College Hospital. For all participants, pretreatment computed tomography and determination of bone quality from voxel values were performed. Thirty-two implant bodies were inserted into the posterior region, and insertion torque was measured. ISQ was also measured at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 weeks postoperatively. RESULTS: Eight implant bodies in the maxilla and 24 in the mandible were inserted. All ISQ values increased, exceeding 60 by 6 weeks postoperatively. For insertion torque < 30 N cm, ISQ increased significantly after 8 weeks. For ≥ 30 N cm, the ratio at which high ISQ values appeared increased significantly after 6 weeks. Compared with the treatment area with insertion torque < 40 N cm, the treatment area ≥ 40 N cm showed a significantly higher voxel value. CONCLUSIONS: No significant relationship was found between the insertion torque value and the ISQ value. Also, it was suggested that the ISQ value was considered to be an important indicator for observing the treatment state of the implant.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The peri-implant epithelium (PIE) plays an important role in the prevention against initial stage of inflammation. To minimize the risk of peri-implantitis, it is necessary to understand the biological characteristics of the PIE. The aim of this study was to investigate the characteristic gene expression profile of PIE as compared to junctional epithelium (JE) using laser microdissection and microarray analysis. METHODS: Left upper first molars of 4-week-old rat were extracted, and titanium alloy implants were placed. Four weeks after surgery, samples were harvested by laser microdissection, and total RNA samples were isolated. Comprehensive analyses of genes expressed in the JE and PIE were performed using microarray analysis. Confirmation of the differential expression of selected genes was performed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: The microarray analysis showed that 712 genes were more than twofold change upregulated in the PIE compared with the JE. Genes Scgb1a1 were significantly upregulated more than 19.1-fold, Lpo more than 19.0-fold, and Gbp2 more than 8.9-fold, in the PIE (P < 0.01). Immunohistochemical localization of SCGB1A1, LPO, and GBP2 was observed in PIE. CONCLUSION: The present results suggested that genes Scgb1a1, Lpo, and Gbp2 are characteristically expressed in the PIE.
Subject(s)
Dental Implantation, Endosseous , Epithelial Attachment/metabolism , Epithelium/metabolism , GTP-Binding Proteins/genetics , Lactoperoxidase/genetics , Up-Regulation , Uteroglobin/genetics , Animals , GTP-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Immunohistochemistry , Lactoperoxidase/metabolism , Laser Capture Microdissection , Male , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis , Peri-Implantitis/genetics , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , Uteroglobin/metabolismABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Implant placement entails disruption of the epithelial continuity, which can lead to various complications. Therefore, the area of mucosal penetration is of particular interest clinically. The goal of the present study was to compare gene expression in peri-implant soft tissue (PIST) with that in oral mucosal tissue (OMT) using microarray analysis, and to investigate which genes were specifically expressed in PIST. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The bilateral upper first molars were extracted from 4-week-old rats and titanium alloy implants placed only in the left-side extraction sockets. Four weeks after surgery, samples were harvested from the left-side PIST and right-side OMT and total RNA samples isolated. Microarray analysis was used to compare gene expression in PIST and OMT, which was then confirmed using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Immunohistochemical staining was also performed to confirm protein level expression. RESULTS: The number of genes expressed with more than a twofold change in PIST compared with OMT was 1,102, of which 750 genes were upregulated and 352 genes were downregulated. The messenger RNA (mRNA) expression of three selected genes-Ceacam1, Ifitm1, and MUC4-were more significantly expressed in PIST than in OMT(P < .01). Immunohistochemical localization of CEACAM1, IFITM1, and MUC4 was observed in PIST, but no immunoreaction was recognized in OMT. CONCLUSION: The result of microarray analysis showed that, because of implant placement, 750 genes were upregulated in PIST compared with OMT. CEACAM1, IFITM1, and MUC4 were specifically upregulated in PIST.
