The Minimal Clinically Important Difference for the Oswestry Disability Index Substantially Varies Based on Calculation Method: Implications to Value Based Care.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate differences in the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) threshold value based on various acceptable statistical methods, and how these differences may influence the interpretation of surgical benefit following elective 1 and 2 level lumbar fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The MCID is a statistically determined threshold value to evaluate if a patient has received benefit from a medical procedure. In the era of value based medicine, the MCID has become increasingly important. However, there is substantial ambiguity surrounding the interpretation of this value given that it can be influenced by both demographic and methodological factors. METHODS: 371 patients that underwent one or two level elective lumbar fusion between June 2021 and June 2023 were included in this study. All patients completed both their preoperative and 6 month post-operative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), as well as two anchor questions concerning satisfaction with their surgical procedure. The MCID values were calculated using 16 accepted statistical methods, and the resulting MCID values were applied to the cohort to determine how many patients reached MCID by 6 months post fusion. RESULTS: Results demonstrated significant variability in the MCID value. The average MCID value for all 16 methods was 10.5±7.0 points range (0.8 to 25). Distribution methods provided lower threshold MCID values but had greater variability while the Anchor methods resulted in higher threshold values but had lower variability. Depending on the method used 30 to 83% of the cohort reached MCID by 6 months. CONCLUSION: The statistical method used to calculate the MCID resulted in significantly different threshold values, and greatly affected the number of patients meeting MCID. The results demonstrates the complexity surrounding the interpretation of MCID values, and calls into question the utility of a single statistically determined value to assess surgical success.

Influence of Anxiety and Depression on Opioid Use Following Lumbar Spine Fusion: A Large Database Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to understand how a mental health disorder, specifically anxiety and depression, influences a patient's postoperative opioid needs following single-level lumbar spine fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Patients with spine pathology commonly demonstrate symptoms of an active psychiatric disorder. Mental health significantly influences how a patient perceives pain and a patient's opioid pain control needs after surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Pearldiver Patient Claims Database was used to identify patients undergoing single-level posterior spine fusion within the United States between 2010 and 2020. Patients were placed into 1 of 4 groups: those with a diagnosis of depression, those with a diagnosis of anxiety, those with a diagnosis of both anxiety and depression, and a control group. χ 2 tests were used to assess differences in the number of patients filling initial and additional opioid prescriptions for up to 90 days following their fusion. RESULTS: The control group filled significantly more initial opioid prescriptions within the first 90 days following their spine fusion ( P <0.001). However, there was no difference among the study groups in regard to the additional need for prescriptions. CONCLUSION: Patients with mental health diagnoses may present as complex patients to spine surgeons; however, this study suggests they do not require additional opioid pain control following a single-level lumbar fusion.

Influence of Anxiety and Depression on Opioid Use After Cervical Spine Fusion: An Analysis of a National Claims Database.

Patients with spine pathology demonstrate an above average rate of active psychiatric disorders, which can influence their recovery. This study was designed to understand how mental health diagnoses (ie, anxiety and depression) influence a patient's postoperative need for opioids after a single level cervical spine fusion. The PearlDiver database was used to identify patients. Patients were placed into one of four groups: those with a diagnosis of depression, those with a diagnosis of anxiety, those with a diagnosis of both anxiety and depression, and a control group. Chi-square tests were used to assess differences in the number of patients filling initial and additional opioid prescriptions for up to 90 days after their fusion. A total of 168,967 patients who underwent an elective cervical spine fusion in the United States between 2010 and 2021 were included in this study. The control group filled significantly more opioid prescriptions within the first 90 days after their cervical fusion (P<.001). There was no difference among the study groups regarding the need to fill additional opioid prescriptions. Patients with a diagnosis of depression and/or anxiety may present as complex patients; however, results suggest they do not need additional opioids for pain control after a single level cervical spine fusion. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(2):89-94.].

Low Body Mass Index Patients Undergoing an Anterior Lumbar Fusion May Have an Increased Risk of Perioperative Complications.

BACKGROUND: Previous research has shown that underweight patients may be at a greater risk of experiencing postsurgical complications. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between body mass index (BMI) and postoperative complications following single-level anterior lumbar fusion (ALF). METHODS: All single-level elective ALF procedures performed between 2010 and 2020 were identified in the PearlDiver Mariner Database. Patients were separated into 6 groups based on the World Health Organization BMI classifications. Differences in postsurgical complications (ie, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, surgical site infection, hardware malfunction, wound dehiscence, and blood transfusion) among BMI categories were assessed using a χ2 contingency test. RESULTS: Results indicated that underweight patients (BMI <20) were at a significantly greater risk of developing deep vein thromboses, experiencing hardware malfunction, and requiring blood transfusion compared with any other BMI classification (P < 0.001). Results also demonstrated that underweight individuals had similar risks of developing surgical site infection and wound dehiscence compared with patients classified as having obesity class III. CONCLUSION: Underweight patients may be at a greater risk than currently believed of experiencing postoperative complications following single-level ALF procedures. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Patients with a BMI of 20 or less should be carefully evaluated prior to surgical intervention to ensure they are optimized for surgery.

The effect of cannabis use on postoperative complications in patients undergoing spine surgery: A national database study.

Background: With the increased use of cannabis in the US, there is a significant need to understand the medical complications associated with its use in relationship to a surgical population. Cannabis has mainly been studied with respect to its qualities of pain treatment, yet few studies have investigated post-surgical complications associated with its use. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore the effect of cannabis use on complications in spine surgery, and compare these complications rates to opioid-related complications. Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted using the PearlDiver Database. Using ICD codes 40,989 patients that underwent lumbar spine fusion between January 2010 and October 2020 were identified and divided into 3 study groups (i.e., control, patients with known opioid use disorder, and patients identified as cannabis users). Differences in the incidence of complications within 30 days of the index procedure and pseudarthrosis rates at 18 months postindex procedure were assessed among study groups using a multivariate logistic regression. Results: Of 12.4% study population used cannabis and 38.8% had a known opioid use disorder. Results indicated increased odds of experiencing a VTE, hypoxia, myocardial infarction, and arrhythmia for both opioid and cannabis users compared to controls; however, when controlling for tobacco use there were no increased odds of complications within the cannabis group. The pseudarthrosis rate was greater in cannabis users (2.4%) than in controls (1.1%). Conclusions: The pseudarthrosis rate was significantly greater in patients using cannabis and opioids compared to the control group. However, when controlling for tobacco use, results suggested a possible negative synergistic between cannabis use and concomitant tobacco use that may influence bone fusion.

Utility of Erector Spinae Plane Blocks for Postoperative Pain Management and Opioid Reduction Following Lumbar Fusions.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of the erector spinae plane regional anesthesia (ESP) block in reducing opioid medication usage and postanesthesia care unit length of stay (PACU-LOS) for patients undergoing either a posterior or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions (PLIF/TLIF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Posterior lumbar spine fusion is a common surgical procedure typically associated with significant postoperative pain. Poorly controlled postoperative pain can lead to a number of poor outcomes. Although opioids are a mainstay for pain control, they are associated with adverse effects and a risk of dependence. Therefore, multimodal pain control has become more prevalent in orthopedics and combines traditional opioid and nonopioid pain mediation with general anesthesia protocols and regional nerve blocks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted for patients undergoing PLIFs or TLIFs between 2019 and 2021. Patients were placed into 2 groups, those receiving an ESP block and those that did not. T tests assuming unequal variances were used to assess differences in pain scores, opioid consumption, and PACU-LOS between groups. RESULTS: The study group demonstrated a 35% reduction in opioid use ( P =0.016), a 16% reduction in pain with activity ( P =0.042), and a 9.7% reduction in pain at rest ( P =0.219) compared with the control group. There were no significant differences in PACU-LOS between groups ( P =0.314). CONCLUSION: The use of an ESP block for patients undergoing PLIFs and TLIFs appears to be a safe and effective means to manage postoperative pain and reduce opioid consumption.

Cervical and Lumbar Disc Arthroplasty: A Review of Current Implant Design and Outcomes.

While spinal disc pathology has traditionally been treated using fusion-based procedures, recent interest in motion-preserving disc arthroplasties has grown. Traditional spinal fusion is associated with loss of motion, alteration of native spine kinematics, and increased risks of adjacent segment disease. The motion conferred by disc arthroplasty is believed to combat these complications. While the first implant designs resulted in poor patient outcomes, recent advances in implant design and technology have shown promising radiographic and clinical outcomes when compared with traditional fusion. These results have led to a rapid increase in the utilization of disc arthroplasty, with rates of cervical arthroplasty nearly tripling over the course of 7 years. The purpose of this review was to discuss the evolution of implant design, the current implant designs utilized, and their associated outcomes. Although disc arthroplasty shows significant promise in addressing some of the drawbacks associated with fusion, it is not without its own risks. Osteolysis, implant migration, and the development of heterotopic ossification have all been associated with disc arthroplasty. As interest in these procedures grows, so does the interest in developing improved implant designs aimed at decreasing these adverse outcomes. Though they are still relatively new, cervical and lumbar disc arthroplasty are likely to become foundational methodologies for the treatment of disc pathology.

Spinal Implant Osseointegration and the Role of 3D Printing: An Analysis and Review of the Literature.

The use of interbody implants for spinal fusion has been steadily increasing to avoid the risks of complications and donor site morbidity when using autologous bone. Understanding the pros and cons of various implant designs can assist the surgeon in choosing the ideal interbody for each individual patient. The goal of these interbody cages is to promote a surface area for bony ingrowth while having the biomechanical properties to support the axial skeleton. Currently, the majority of interbody implants consists of metal or polyether ether ketone (PEEK) cages with bone graft incorporated inside. Titanium alloy implants have been commonly used, however, the large difference in modulus of elasticity from bone has inherent issues. PEEK implants have a desirable surface area with the benefit of a modulus of elasticity closer to that of bone. Unfortunately, clinically, these devices have had increased risk of subsidence. More recently, 3D printed implants have come into the market, providing mechanical stability with increased surface design for bony ingrowth. While clinical outcomes studies are limited, early results have demonstrated more reliable and quicker fusion rates using 3D custom interbody devices. In this review, we discuss the biology of osseointegration, the use of surface coated implants, as well as the potential benefits of using 3D printed interbodies.

Does the Size or Location of Lumbar Disc Herniation Predict the Need for Operative Treatment?

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to determine whether the absolute size (mm2), relative size (% canal compromise), or location of a single-level, lumbar disc herniation (LDH) on axial and sagittal cuts of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were predictive of eventual surgical intervention. METHODS: MRIs of 89 patients were reviewed, and patients were split into groups based on type of management received (34 nonoperative vs 55 microdiscectomy). Radiographic characteristics-including size of disc herniation (mm2), size of spinal canal (mm2), location of herniation on axial (central, paracentral, foraminal) and sagittal (disc level, suprapedicle, pedicle, infrapedicle) planes, and type of herniation (bulge, protrusion, extrusion, sequestration)-were measured by 2 independent, orthopedic spine fellows and compared between groups via univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The operative group showed a significantly higher percentage of canal compromise (39.5% vs 31.1%, P = .001) compared to the nonoperative group. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed higher odds of eventual operative intervention for a disc protrusion (odds ratio [OR] 6.30 [1.99, 19.86], P = .002) or disc extrusion (OR 11.5 [1.63, 81.2], P = .014) for Rater 1 and a higher odds of eventual surgical management for a paracentral location for both Rater 1 and Rater 2 (OR = 3.39 [1.25, 9.22], P = .017, and OR = 5.46 [1.77, 16.8], P = .003, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Disc herniations in a paracentral location were more likely to undergo operative treatment than those more centrally located, on axial MRI views.

Can Imaging Characteristics on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predict the Acuity of a Lumbar Disc Herniation?

BACKGROUND: Currently, no authors of existing studies have attempted to classify the signal characteristics of disc herniation on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and their temporal relationship to symptoms of lumbar radiculopathy. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the MRI signal characteristics are predictive of acuity of symptoms in patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients treated at an academic center for LDH from 2015 to 2018. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on symptom duration (acute: ≤6 weeks; or chronic: >4 months). Two independent observers measured T1, T2 signal, and other MRI characteristics at the affected disc level. Univariate analysis was used to compare differences between groups. Multiple logistic regression was used to determine predictors of acuity. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients were included (33 acute, 56 chronic) with no significant baseline differences between groups. Rater 2 observed a higher proportion of disc bulges in the chronic group (P = .021) and a higher abnormal T1 herniation signal in the acute group (P = .048). Rater 1 found a higher Pfirrmann grade (P = .005) and a higher prevalence of vertebral body spurring (P = .007) in the chronic group. Interobserver agreement for T1 central and herniation signals demonstrated poor to fair agreement, whereas the remainder of the measurements showed moderate to substantial agreement (κ = 0.4-0.8). Multiple logistic regression showed that Pfirrmann Grade 5 (odds ratio = 0.12, 95% confidence interval [0.02, 0.74], P = .022) and anterior/posterior spurring (odds ratio = 0.053 [0.03, 0.85], P = .023) were not associated with acuity. CONCLUSIONS: Other than Pfirrmann grade or vertebral body spurring, no MRI characteristics could be reliably identified that correlate with acuity of symptoms. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Current trends in ambulatory spine surgery: a systematic review.

Spine surgery continues to move into the ambulatory setting in an effort to pair high-quality care delivery with low-cost facilities. The purpose of this review was to assess the current literature for trends in the practice of ambulatory spine surgery. A systematic review of the English language literature from the past five years was performed utilizing PRISMA standards. The results demonstrate that current focus of research emphasizes the safety of ambulatory surgery-with several studies commenting on complication rates, patient selection, and postoperative protocols to prevent readmissions or complications. Research is also focused on quality of care, and ensuring non-inferiority of ambulatory surgery when compared with traditional inpatient hospitalizations. Importantly, no level I or II literature has been published on the topic in the past five years, suggesting a renewed need for high quality prospective studies.

Changing reimbursement models and private equity ownership in spine surgery.

Rising costs of healthcare have been a problem in the United States in the past decade, with unnecessary strain on both providers and patients. The fee-for-service reimbursement model has been proposed as one of the biggest contributors to this phenomenon; as such, newer reimbursement model-including the bundled payments model-have been proposed and are becoming more widely adopted. This review will first discuss the current payment models in practice and then overview private equity ownership as a new avenue in this particular domain.

Critical analysis of trends in lumbar fusion for degenerative disorders revisited: influence of technique on fusion rate and clinical outcomes.

PURPOSE: Lumbar fusion for degenerative disorders is among the most common spine surgical procedures performed. The purpose of this study was to analyze fusion, complications, and clinical success for lumbar fusion performed with various surgical techniques as reported in the literature from 2000 to 2015 and compare with previous critical analysis of outcomes from 1980 to 2000. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature to identify all studies of adult lumbar fusion for degenerative disorders published between January 1, 2000, and August 31, 2015, was performed adhering to PRISMA guidelines. Studies were included if they enabled analysis of outcomes of individual fusion techniques. RESULTS: Data from 8599 patients extracted from 160 studies were recorded. Posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF and TLIF) had significantly higher fusion rates compared to instrumented posterolateral fusion (PLF) (OR 3.20 and 2.46, respectively). Clinical success rate was statistically higher with MIS versus non-MIS fusion (OR 2.44). While methodological quality was higher in studies from 2000 to 2015 than prior decades, the outcomes of comparable procedures were about the same. CONCLUSIONS: Lumbar fusions for degenerative disorders from 2000 to 2015 demonstrate a trend toward more interbody fusions and MIS techniques than prior decades. Clinical success with MIS appears more likely than with non-MIS fusions, despite equivalent fusion and complication rates. While these data are intriguing, they should be interpreted cautiously considering the level of heterogeneity of the studies available. Further, high-quality comparative studies are warranted to better understand the relative benefits of more complex interbody and MIS fusions for these conditions. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Understanding Financial Statements in Clinical Practice: A Primer.

The purpose of this article is to describe the different types of financial statements and the information they contain regarding the current and long-term financial health of a business practice. These statements are essential to guiding strategic decision making for physicians and executives.