Analysis of the risk factors for osteoporosis and its prevalence after gastrectomy for gastric cancer in older patients: a prospective study.

PURPOSE: Osteoporosis leads to fragility fractures and is a major public health problem. We conducted this study to analyze the prevalence of and risk factors for osteoporosis after gastrectomy in older patients. METHODS: This multicenter prospective trial comprised older patients without recurrence of gastric cancer for > 3 years after curative surgery. The prevalence of osteoporosis was identified using the World Health Organization bone mineral density (BMD)-based definition. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the risk factors for osteoporosis. RESULTS: BMD values were measured in 267 of the 271 enrolled patients. The prevalence of osteoporosis was 38.2% (men 24.0%; women 60%). Analysis using FRAX® revealed that 51.7% of patients were candidates for pharmacologic therapy. Female sex (odds ratio [OR] 5.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.61-10.2), age (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.00-1.12), low body mass index (< 19.0 kg/m2) after gastrectomy (OR 5.31, 95% CI 2.79-10.13), and history of fracture (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.06-4.02) were independently associated with osteoporosis. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of osteoporosis in older patients after gastrectomy was 38.2%. Moreover, female sex, age, low body mass index after gastrectomy, and a history of fracture were risk factors significantly associated with osteoporosis. Thus, older patients undergoing gastrectomy should have proactive surveillance and receive treatment for osteoporosis.

[A Case of Achieving CR through Chemoradiotherapy for Postoperative Oligo Lymph Node Metastasis in Gastric Cancer].

We present a case of oligo lymph node metastasis in a 70s man who had previously undergone subtotal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer in the prepylorus. Postoperatively, adjuvant chemotherapy was administered for a duration of 1 year. During the third postoperative year, elevated tumor markers and lymph node enlargement prompted a diagnosis of lymph node metastasis. Subsequent chemoradiotherapy resulted in a complete response(CR), which has been sustained for 2 years without any recurrence. The outcomes of this case indicate that chemoradiotherapy stands as a viable treatment option for oligo lymphatic recurrence in gastric cancer.

Successful laparoscopic conversion surgery for gastric cancer with para-aortic lymph node metastasis after third-line chemotherapy: a case report.

We herein reported a case of advanced gastric cancer (GC) with para-aortic lymph node (PALN) metastases who successful achieved downstaging following systemic chemotherapy and underwent curative laparoscopic conversion surgery. A 74-year-old male patient diagnosed with advanced GC and PALN metastases [cT4N3M1(LYM), stage IVA] was administered chemotherapy and immunotherapy for 28 months. After 27 courses of nivolumab as third-line chemotherapy, PALN enlargement was resolved, for which conversion surgery was planned. Subsequently, laparoscopic distal D2 gastrectomy with sampling para-aortic lymphadenectomy was performed, after which a pathological diagnosis of type V moderately differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma with mucinous adenocarcinoma, stage ypT3 (SS), ly1c, and v0, was established. The pathological proximal and distal tumor margins were negative. One lymph node metastasis was observed (No. 6; 1/25). The sampled lymph nodes were negative (No. 16a1: 0/2). The therapeutic effect was categorized as Grade 1a. The postoperative course was uneventful, with the patient receiving nivolumab to control for potential PALN metastases. Postoperatively, no recurrence was observed over 11 months. Laparoscopic conversion gastrectomy was successfully performed in a patient with advanced GC that was originally unresectable, suggesting that minimally invasive surgery may be a good option for originally unresectable advanced GC that becomes resectable.

Utility of monthly minodronate for osteoporosis after gastrectomy: Prospective multicenter randomized controlled trials.

AIM: Osteoporosis in patients after gastrectomy is increasing with the aging of gastric cancer patients. Bisphosphonates are effective treatments for osteoporosis; however, their safety or efficacy in postgastrectomy patients has not been established. The purpose of this multicenter prospective intervention study was to investigate the impact of monthly minodronate on osteoporosis after gastrectomy. METHODS: Of the 261 enrolled gastric cancer patients, 164 patients were diagnosed with osteoporosis based on criteria of the Japan Society of Osteoporosis. They were randomly assigned 1:1 to groups treated with active vitamin D (VD group) or monthly minodronate (MIN group). The primary endpoint was changes in lumbar bone mineral density (L-BMD) 12 mo after the start of administration. The secondary endpoints were changes in bone metabolism markers, adverse events (AEs), or treatment completion rates. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in patient background between the VD (n = 82) and MIN (n = 82) groups. In the MIN group, the increase in L-BMD was significantly higher than that in the VD group (4.52% vs 1.72%, P = .001), with a significant reduction in bone metabolism markers; blood NTX (-25.6% vs -1.6%, P < .01) and serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (-34.3% vs -20.1%, P < .01). AEs were observed in 26.8% and 9.3% of the patients and treatment completion rates were 77.5% and 89.3% in the MIN and VD groups, respectively. Serious AEs were not observed in either group. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the safety and efficacy of monthly minodronate, suggesting that this treatment may be useful for osteoporosis after gastrectomy (UMIN000015517).

A safe and simple procedure for laparoscopic hepatectomy with combined diaphragmatic resection.

Diaphragmatic resection may be required beneath the diaphragm in some patients with liver tumors. Laparoscopic diaphragmatic resection is technically difficult to secure in the surgical field and in suturing. We report a case of successful laparoscopic hepatectomy with diaphragmatic resection. A 48-year-old man who underwent laparoscopic partial hepatectomy for liver metastasis of rectal cancer 20 months ago underwent surgery because of a new hepatic lesion that invaded the diaphragm. The patient was placed in the left hemilateral decubitus position. The liver and diaphragm attachment areas were encircled using hanging tape. Liver resection preceded diaphragmatic resection with the hanging tape in place. Two snake retractors were used to secure the surgical field for the inflow of CO2 into the pleural space after diaphragmatic resection. The defective part of the diaphragm was repaired using continuous or interrupted sutures. Both ends of the suture were tied with an absorbable suture clip without ligation. In laparoscopic liver resection with diaphragmatic resection, the range of diaphragmatic resection can be minimized by performing liver resection using the hanging method before diaphragmatic resection. The surgical field can be secured using snake retractors. Suturing with an absorbable suture clip is conveniently feasible. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13691-021-00506-x.

Docetaxel plus S-1 versus cisplatin plus S-1 in unresectable gastric cancer without measurable lesions: a randomized phase II trial (HERBIS-3).

BACKGROUND: Cisplatin plus S-1 (CS) is the standard first-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) in Japan. A previous phase III trial showed that docetaxel plus S-1 (DS) was effective for AGC without measurable lesions, but no studies have compared these two regimens. METHODS: Eligible patients had unresectable or recurrent HER2-negative AGC without measurable lesions. Patients were randomized to DS (docetaxel 40 mg/m2 on day 1, S-1 80-120 mg on days 1-14, every 3 weeks) or CS (cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 8, S-1 80-120 mg on days 1-21, every 5 weeks). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: All patients had unresectable primary disease. Sixty-one patients were randomly assigned to DS (n = 30) or CS (n = 31). One CS patient was ineligible due to HER2 positivity. The median number of cycles was 9.5 (range 2-49) with DS and 5.5 (range 1-10) with CS. There were no treatment-related deaths. The most common grade 3-4 non-hematological toxicity was fatigue (7% with DS, 13% with CS), followed by anorexia (3% with DS, 10% with CS) and diarrhea (3% with DS, 10% with CS). The 2-year OS rates were 43.3% with DS and 30.0% with CS (log-rank P = 0.113), with a hazard ratio of 0.617 (95% confidence interval 0.337-1.128), indicating non-inferiority of DS to CS with respect to OS (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: DS showed slightly but nonsignificantly less toxicity and higher efficacy than CS for AGC without measurable lesions. DS should be further investigated in phase III trials.

[A Case of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma That Caused Rapid Re-Growth Due to Lenvatinib Withdrawal].

Lenvatinib is reported to have a stronger angiogenesis-inhibiting effect in hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)than sorafenib, but in many cases dose reduction and withdrawal are required due to the occurrence of adverse events. We report 12 cases of using lenvatinib for advanced HCC in our hospital together with a case of rapid re-growth due to withdrawal of lenvatinib. In 2 cases, metastases of HCC were controlled and radically resected. All patients required lenvatinib withdrawal due to Grade 3 adverse event, except for 2 cases that started with dose reduction. There were 3 cases in which drug withdrawal was required for 2 weeks or more, and in 2 of them, rapid re-growth of tumor was observed during the drug withdrawal and the treatment could not be continued. Although the use of lenvatinib may results in tumor shrinkage, suggesting that prolonged drug withdrawal may make disease management difficult. It is important to manage adverse events and minimize days of drug withdrawal by reducing the dose and systematically discontinuing the drug.

[Ascending Colon Cancer with Hemophilia A Treated with Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy under Control of a Blood Coagulant Factor-A Case Report].

Here, we report a case of ascending colon cancer successfully treated with laparoscopic right hemicolectomy in a 74- year-old man with a medical history of hemophilia A. He was admitted to our hospital because of bloody stool and diagnosed with type 2 ascending colon cancer based on colonoscopy findings. Preoperatively, blood transfusion and administration of recombinant factor Ⅷ products were performed. Surgery involved laparoscopic right hemicolectomy plus group 3 lymph node dissection. No complications, such as bleeding, occurred during hospitalization. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 8. There have been a few reports of laparoscopic surgery for patients with hemophilia. However, this case suggests that it can be safely performed with planned factor Ⅷ supplementation in the perioperative period.

Our experience of repeat laparoscopic liver resection in patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Repeat liver resection is an effective treatment approach for patients with recurrent hepatocellular cell carcinoma (HCC). However, the surgical feasibility and oncological significance of repeat laparoscopic liver resection (r-LLR) remain unproven. This study evaluates and compares the clinical outcomes of non-anatomic r-LLR applied towards recurrent HCC, with those of primary LLR (p-LLR) for primary HCC. METHODS: This retrospective study reports 104 patients with HCC, treated with LLR between 2014 and 2018. Twenty eight of these patients underwent r-LLR for recurrent HCC. The clinical and surgical variables were reviewed for all cases. RESULTS: The analysis was limited to non-anatomic resection across both groups (r-LLR: 89% (25/28) vs. p-LLR: 80% (61/76)). There were no statistically significant differences about patient background between the two groups, with the exception of Child-Pugh classification. r-LLR surgical techniques included single-site laparoscopic adhesiolysis (32%, 8/25), Pringle maneuver (8%, 2/25), and crush-clamp method using BiClamp for hepatic parenchymal transection (72%, 18/25). No severe postoperative complications were observed in the r-LLR group. Postoperative hospital stays and procedure-related postoperative survival were similar for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Non-anatomical r-LLR renders comparable surgical and oncological outcomes. Our data suggest that non-anatomical r-LLR is a safe and feasible therapeutic approach to recurrent HCC.

Successful management of aberrant right hepatic duct during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a rare case report.

BACKGROUND: Anatomic variants of the biliary tree present challenges to surgical management during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and affect perioperative outcomes. An aberrant right hepatic duct connecting into the cystic duct is a practically important variation because of the susceptibility to serious postoperative refractory bile leakage. We report a successful case of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the aberrant right hepatic duct of a patient diagnosed with chronic cystitis. CASE PRESENTATION: A 49-year-old man was referred to our department for treatment of chronic cholecystitis. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography indicated that the cystic duct branched from the common bile duct and an aberrant bile duct connected to the cystic duct. Intraoperative cholangiography revealed that the bile duct was not confluent to the major right branch of the intrahepatic bile duct and drained a narrow area. Preoperative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography had diagnostic value. Furthermore, intraoperative cholangiography with the Critical View of Safety method was paramount to achieving safe cholecystectomy based on confirmation of the biliary anatomy and the drainage area of the aberrant right hepatic duct. CONCLUSION: We encountered a rare but clinically significant case of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This case suggests that precise understanding of the anatomy and drainage area of the aberrant right hepatic duct preoperatively and intraoperatively can lead to safe cholecystectomy.

[Proteinuria in Patients with Gastric Cancer Treated with Ramucirumab].

BACKGROUND: Ramucirumab, an antiangiogenic agent, often causes proteinuria as a characteristic adverse effect. We retro- spectively evaluated proteinuria and clarified the significance of the protein/creatinine ratio by using single urine samples from patients with advanced gastric cancer who were treated with ramucirumab. METHODS: Twenty-three patients who received ramucirumabb etween June 2015 and April 2016 were enrolled. A total of 199 urinalysis specimens were qualitatively analyzed to obtain urine protein levels and the protein/creatinine ratio, and the values were compared. RESULTS: Frequency of proteinu- ria was 43.5%(grade 1: 26.1%, grade 2: 8.7%, and grade 3: 8.7%). The protein/creatinine ratio was less than 2 in -, ±, and 1+ based on the urine protein qualitative examination; 12.5% of 2+ and 71.4% of 3+ or 4+ had a protein/creatinine ratio over 2. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with gastric cancer, treated with ramucirumab, the protein/creatinine ratio should be examined in cases of 2+, 3+ or 4+ via a qualitative examination.

Laparoscopic resection of retroperitoneal paraganglioma behind the Spiegel lobe in a kyphotic patient: A rare case report.

Extra-adrenal paraganglioma is a rare form of neuroendocrine neoplasm capable of catecholamine secretion. The surgical risks associated with the tumor location are compounded in this case of a kyphotic patient. This report presents the successful application of laparoscopy on extra-adrenal paraganglioma located behind the Spiegel lobe in a kyphotic patient. The operation was performed after 1 week of α-blocker administration. The laparoscopic approach, with the patient in the left hemilateral decubitus position on a rotating table, provided optimal access for safe tumor resection after complete hepatic right lobe mobilization. The patient's postoperative course was uneventful. Based on the results, the laparoscopic approach can be a safe and effective method for resecting extra-adrenal paraganglioma in the challenging case of a kyphotic patient.

Randomized, Open-Label Phase II Study Comparing Capecitabine-Cisplatin Every 3 Weeks with S-1-Cisplatin Every 5 Weeks in Chemotherapy-Naïve Patients with HER2-Negative Advanced Gastric Cancer: OGSG1105, HERBIS-4A Trial.

LESSONS LEARNED: Evidence has suggested that capecitabine-cisplatin is similar or possibly superior to S-1-cisplatin in terms of safety and efficacy for Japanese patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC).As far as we are aware, our study is the first randomized trial of two regimens consisting of an oral fluoropyrimidine plus cisplatin in human epidermal growth receptor 2-negative AGC patients with measurable lesions. BACKGROUND: We performed a phase II study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of capecitabine plus cisplatin in comparison with S-1 plus cisplatin for first-line treatment of human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced gastric cancer in Japan. METHODS: Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive either capecitabine at 1,000 mg/m2 twice daily for 14 days plus cisplatin at 80 mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks (n = 43) or S-1 at 40-60 mg twice daily for 21 days plus cisplatin at 60 mg/m2 on day 8 every 5 weeks (n = 41). The primary endpoint of the study was response rate. RESULTS: Response rate did not differ significantly between the capecitabine-cisplatin and S-1-cisplatin groups (53.5% vs. 51.2%, respectively, p > .999). S-1-cisplatin tended to confer a better progression-free survival (PFS; median of 5.9 vs. 4.1 months, p = .284), overall survival (OS; median of 13.5 vs. 10.0 months, p = .290), and time to treatment failure (TTF; median of 4.5 vs. 3.1 months, p = .052) compared with capecitabine-cisplatin. Common hematologic toxicities of grade 3 or 4 included anemia and neutropenia in both groups. However, anorexia, fatigue, and hyponatremia of grade 3 or 4 occurred more frequently in the capecitabine-cisplatin group. CONCLUSION: Capecitabine-cisplatin failed to demonstrate superior efficacy compared with S-1-cisplatin. The higher incidence of severe adverse events with capecitabine-cisplatin suggests that S-1-cisplatin should remain the standard first-line chemotherapy for HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer in Japan.

Nab-paclitaxel versus solvent-based paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced gastric cancer (ABSOLUTE): an open-label, randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Weekly administration of solvent-based paclitaxel is one of the standard second-line chemotherapy regimens for advanced gastric cancer. Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) was developed to improve the solubility of paclitaxel and does not need premedication to avoid infusion-related reactions associated with solvent-based paclitaxel. Additionally, higher doses of nab-paclitaxel can be administered over a shorter infusion time and at higher drug concentrations compared with solvent-based paclitaxel. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel versus solvent-based paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced gastric cancer. METHODS: We did a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial at 72 institutions in Japan. Patients aged 20 years or older with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma refractory to a fluoropyrimidine-containing first-line chemotherapy regimen, with progressive disease or a relapse fewer than 24 weeks after the final dose of adjuvant chemotherapy were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive intravenous nab-paclitaxel (260 mg/m2) every 3 weeks (on day 1 of a 21-day cycle), weekly nab-paclitaxel (100 mg/m2, on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle), or weekly solvent-based paclitaxel (80 mg/m2, on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle). Randomisation was done with the minimisation method, with stratification for previous use of docetaxel, presence of peritoneal metastases, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the full analysis set, which included all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study drug, with a non-inferiority margin of 1·25 for the hazard ratio. This trial is registered with Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center Clinical Trial, number JapicCTI-132059, and has been completed. FINDINGS: Between March 13, 2013, and May 14, 2015, 741 patients were randomly assigned to nab-paclitaxel every 3 weeks (n=247), weekly nab-paclitaxel (n=246), or weekly solvent-based paclitaxel (n=248). Median follow-up for overall survival was 9·99 months (IQR 6·05-15·05). Median overall survival was 10·3 months (95% CI 8·7-11·4) in the group that received in the nab-paclitaxel every 3 weeks, 11·1 months (9·9-13·0) in the weekly nab-paclitaxel group, and 10·9 months (9·4-11·8) in the weekly solvent-based paclitaxel group. Weekly nab-paclitaxel was non-inferior to weekly solvent-based paclitaxel (hazard ratio 0·97, 97·5% CI 0·76-1·23; non-inferiority one-sided p=0·0085), whereas nab-paclitaxel every 3 weeks was not non-inferior to solvent-based paclitaxel (1·06, 95% CI 0·87-1·31; non-inferiority one-sided p=0·062). The main grade 3 or worse adverse drug reactions were neutropenia (158 [65%] of 244 patients in the group that received nab-paclitaxel every 3 weeks vs 99 [41%] of 241 patients in the weekly nab-paclitaxel group vs 71 [29%] of 243 patients in the weekly solvent-based paclitaxel group), peripheral sensory neuropathy (49 [20%] vs six [2%] vs six [2%]), and febrile neutropenia (30 [12%] vs seven [3%] vs two [1%]). Hypersensitivity reactions were less frequent with nab-paclitaxel every 3 weeks (two [1%] patients) and weekly nab-paclitaxel (three [1%] patients) than with weekly solvent-based paclitaxel (13 [5%] patients). Four treatment-related deaths were reported overall (pneumonia in one patient in the group that received nab-paclitaxel every 3 weeks, febrile neutropenia/pneumonia in one patient, and septic shock in one patient in the weekly nab-paclitaxel group, and respiratory disease/interstitial lung disease in one patient in the weekly solvent-based paclitaxel group). INTERPRETATION: As the trial showed that weekly nab-paclitaxel was non-inferior to weekly solvent-based paclitaxel in terms of overall survival, the advantages of the nab-paclitaxel formulation make it a potential regimen for second-line treatment of gastric cancer. FUNDING: Taiho Pharmaceutical.

Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors for gastric cancer patients with bone metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Bone metastasis due to gastric cancer is rare, and the clinical features have not been fully evaluated. We investigated the clinical features, treatment outcomes, and prognostic factors in gastric cancer patients with bone metastasis. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data on 34 consecutive patients who were diagnosed radiologically with bone metastasis due to gastric cancer. We estimated the overall survival after the diagnosis of bone metastasis using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method and evaluated which clinicopathological factors were associated with prognostic factors for survival using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: The treatment for the primary tumor was surgery in 16 patients (47.1%) and chemotherapy in 18 patients (52.9%). The median serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels at the time of bone metastasis were 375.5 and 249 IU/L, respectively. Ten patients (29.4%) were diagnosed with bone metastasis and gastric cancer at the same time. The 6-month survival rate after the diagnosis of bone metastasis was 63.8%, and the median survival time was 227.5 days. Multivariate analysis revealed that metachronous metastasis (p = 0.035) and extraosseous metastasis (p = 0.028) were significant risk factors for poor survival. CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis of gastric cancer with bone metastasis was poor, and metachronous metastasis and extraosseous metastasis were shown to be poor prognostic factors. Serum ALP, LDH, and tumor markers are not always high, so aggressive diagnosis using appropriate modalities such as bone scan, MRI, or PET-CT may be necessary in routine practice even in asymptomatic patients.

[A Case of Recurrent Gastric Cancer with Grade 3 Proteinuria Caused by Ramucirumab plus Paclitaxel Therapy].

Proteinuria is one of the characteristic adverse events by ramucirumab(RAM)plus paclitaxel(PTX)combination therapy for advanced gastric cancer. We reported a case of recurrent gastric cancer with grade(gr)3 proteinuria caused by RAM plus PTX therapy. 77-year-old woman was underwent distal gastrectomy in 76 years old for gastric cancer that was diagnosed mucinous adenocarcinoma, fStage III C(T4aN3H0P0CY0M0)and received adjuvant chemotherapy of S-1 for 1 year. She suffered from peritoneal recurrence with ascites after 1 year and 4 months of the operation and RAM(8mg/kg; day 1 and 15)plus PTX(80mg/m2; day 1, 8 and 15)therapy was administrated as second-line chemotherapy. After 1 course, weekly PTX has been continued for gr 3 proteinuria and the ascites disappeared after 4 courses. This successful case might indicate that it was important for patients with gr 3 proteinuria as adverse event to consider discontinuance of RAM and continuation of PTX according to the proper usage guide of RAM.

[Clinical Experience of Ramucirumab for Treating Advanced Gastric Cancer].

BACKGROUND: The REGARD and RAINBOW trials showed that ramucirumab(RAM)alone and RAM plus paclitaxel(PTX) were effective therapies for advanced gastric cancer patients previously treated with chemotherapy. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of RAM alone and PTX plus RAM in such patients. METHODS: Patients who were received RAM at 8mg/kg or RAM plus PTX at 80mg/m2(on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle)between June 2015 and March 2016 were enrolled in this study. We compared the clinical outcome of RAM alone(RAM group, n=10)with that of RAM plus PTX(PTX+RAM group, n=13). RESULTS: The RAM group contained many more patients with poor performance status or prior chemotherapy of 2 or more regimens than the PTX+RAM group. All patients in both groups received chemotherapy on an outpatient basis. One case of grade 3 or 4 hematological adverse events was found in the RAM group and 6 cases were found in the PTX+RAM group. The overall response rate was 10% in the RAM group and 30% in the PTX+RAM group. Progression-free survival was 54 days in the RAM group and 187 days in the PTX+RAM group(p=0.0374). Overall survival was 158 days in the RAM group and was not reached in the PTX+RAM group(p=0.1091). CONCLUSIONS: RAM alone and RAM plus PTX can be administered safely on an outpatient basis and are beneficial for advanced gastric cancer patients previously treated with chemotherapy.

[Examination of Patients with Malignant Obstruction Treated with Chemotherapy after Ileo/Coleostomy].

Management for obstructive cancer of the colon diverges into many ways. The aim of this study was to evaluate the treatment course of patients with malignant obstruction after ileo/coleostomy. Thirty-six patients with malignant obstruction who underwent ileo/coleostomy in our hospital from May 2012 to January 2016were enrolled in the study. Clinical outcomes were the period before treatment initiation, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, primary lesion resection, and death, and these were retrospectively analyzed. Although 9 stomal complications occurred, no case experienced a delayed treatment start. However, patients with perioperative complications, sepsis due to the tumor, pneumonia, cerebral infractions, and ileus needed a long recovery period before treatment initiation. Patients who need ileo/coleostomy must be considered for performance status and ways to decrease perioperative complications to prevent stomal complications from chemo/radiotherapy.

[A Case of an Elderly Patient with Unresectable Gastric Cancer Treated by Paclitaxel and Ramucirumab].

An 80-year-old man was admitted to our hospital with appetite loss in December 2014. Gastroduodenal scope, abdominal computed tomography(CT), and laparoscopy revealed type 4 advanced gastric cancer(poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma) with multiple lymph node(LN)involvement and multiple peritoneal metastasis. S-1(80mg/body)was administrated between January 2015 and September 2015 in the outpatient clinic. A partial response was obtained, but a gastric tumor, ascites, and LN re-growth were observed. Since October 2015, paclitaxel(PTX)(70mg/m2; day 1, 8, and 15)and ramucir- umab(RAM)(8mg/kg; day 1 and 15)have been administered. After 2 courses, bi-weekly PTX plus RAM were continued for grade 3 neutropenia and grade 2 anorexia. The tumor and LNs partially responded, and the ascites disappeared. With this dosage and administration schedule, the partial response(PR)was maintained for approximately 8 months without any severe adverse reactions. This successful case might indicate that it is important for elderly patients with gastric cancer that progressed with prior chemotherapy regimens to consider appropriate reduction of the PTX dosage, schedule, and continuation of RAM.

[Three Cases of Bleeding from Advanced Gastric Cancer during Chemotherapy Treated with Transcatheter Arterial Embolization(TAE)].

Case 1: An 71-year-old man underwent chemotherapy with S-1 plus trastuzumab to treat type 3 gastric cancer that was diagnosed as Stage IV tubular adenocarcinoma(T4b[Panc], N3, H0, CY1, P0, M1). For anemia and active bleeding from the tumor, transcatheter arterial embolization(TAE)was performed with metallic coils on the splenic artery. Infarction of the spleen and left pleural effusion were observed. Second-line paclitaxel(PTX)chemotherapy was administered 4 weeks after TAE. Case 2: An 76-year-old man underwent chemotherapy with S-1 plus cisplatin to treat type 3 gastric cancer that was diagnosed as Stage IV tubular adenocarcinoma(T4a, N3, H0, P1, M1). For anemia and active bleeding from the tumor, TAE with gelatin sponge(Serescure®)was performed on the left and right gastric artery. Radiotherapy(31 Gy)with S-1 was performed because TAE was not effective for bleeding. After chemoradiotherapy, nab-PTX was administered. Case 3: An 74- year-old man underwent second-line chemotherapy with nab-PTX to treat type 4 advanced gastric cancer that was diagnosed as Stage IV tubular adenocarcinoma(T4a, N3, H1, P0, M1). For progression of anemia due to tumor bleeding, TAE with gelatin sponge(Serescure®)was performed on the left gastric artery. TAE was effective, and he was discharged from the hospital. In 2 of 3 cases, hemostasis was achieved by TAE. Therefore, TAE is effective to decrease bleeding from gastric cancer during chemotherapy.