Renoprotective differences between perindopril and enalapril in the diabetic hypertensive rat do not reflect glomerular angiotensin-converting enzyme activity.

1. The various angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have structural differences which affect their affinities for the catalytic sites on converting enzyme. We postulated that such differences might result in differences in renoprotective efficacy. We investigated this in the diabetic spontaneous hypertensive rat. We also investigated whether these differences might reflect variations in glomerular or plasma angiotensin-converting enzyme activity. 2. One week after induction of diabetes, rats were started on antihypertensive therapy: enalapril, 10 mg.day-1.kg-1, or perindopril, 4 mg.day-1.kg-1, in the drinking water. After 3 months, the rats were killed, blood samples were taken and tissues were harvested. Angiotensin-converting enzyme activity in isolated glomeruli and plasma was measured by fluorimetric assay. Glomerular protein content was also determined. 3. Urinary protein excretion was significantly lower in perindopril-treated rats than in either controls (P < 0.0005) or enalapril-treated rats (P < 0.05). Glomerular protein content was also lower in perindopril-treated rats (P < 0.05 versus enalapril; P < 0.005 versus control). There was no difference in glomerular angiotensin-converting enzyme activity between the two inhibitors although both were lower than control values (enalapril P < 0.025; perindopril P < 0.025). Plasma angiotensin-converting enzyme activity was significantly lower in the perindopril group than in either control (P < 0.005) or the enalapril group (P < 0.01). 4. We conclude that in the spontaneous hypertensive rat with streptozotocin-induced diabetes, perindopril is more effective than enalapril in reducing proteinuria and glomerular protein accumulation. This difference does not result from differences in glomerular-converting enzyme activity.

Acute but not chronic angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition induces enzyme synthesis in the glomerulus of the spontaneously hypertensive rat.

1. Treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors slows the rate of progression of nephropathy in the spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) with streptozotocin-induced diabetes. Paradoxically, however, chronic ACE inhibitor therapy has been reported to be associated with induction of ACE in the plasma. We sought to determine whether induction also occurred in the glomerulus. 2. Seven days after induction of diabetes rats were randomized to receive perindopril (4 mg/kg per day) in the drinking water or water alone. Blood glucoses were maintained 6-10 mmol/L by daily ultralente insulin. Rats were killed after 1 and 12 weeks of ACE inhibitor therapy and the kidneys were harvested. Angiotensin-converting enzyme activity was determined in isolated glomeruli before and after removal of perindopril and reconstitution with zinc sulphate. 3. After 1 week of ACE inhibitor therapy, glomerular ACE was significantly greater after removal of perindopril than either before its removal (P < 0.025) or in the untreated controls (P < 0.025). After 12 weeks of therapy, ACE activity was significantly lower in the perindopril-treated group than in the untreated controls (P < 0.025). There was no increase in ACE activity following removal of perindopril. 4. These studies suggest that short-term ACE inhibition is associated with induction of ACE in the glomerulus. However, there was no increase in ACE activity after removal of perindopril, suggesting that induction of synthesis of this enzyme in the glomerulus does not occur during chronic ACE inhibition.

Differential efficacy of perindopril and enalapril in experimental diabetic nephropathy.

1. Treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors ameliorates human and experimental diabetic nephropathy, possibly as a result of changes in angiotensin II (AngII) and/or bradykinin concentrations. However, ACE is an indiscriminate enzyme, which hydrolyses numerous vasoactive peptides at two catalytic sites that are thought to be substrate specific. AngI is cleaved at the C-terminal site, bradykinin at both the C- and N-terminal sites, while other substrates may be preferentially cleaved at the N-terminal site. Of the various ACE inhibitors, some (e.g. perindopril) bind preferentially to the C-terminal site while others (e.g. enalapril) bind to both. We compared the efficacy of perindopril and enalapril in the diabetic SHR to determine whether all the benefits of ACE inhibition derive from changes in the concentrations of C-terminal related substrates. 2. Diabetes was induced by tail vein injection of streptozotocin (60 mg/kg) in 14 week old SHR. Blood glucose was maintained at 4-8 mmol/L by daily ultralente insulin injection and rats were randomized to control, enalapril (10 mg/kg per day) or perindopril (4 mg/kg per day) groups. Blood pressure, creatinine clearance and urinary protein excretion were monitored for 3 months. 3. Blood pressure in both treatment groups was lower than in control (perindopril P < 0.0001; enalapril P < 0.0001). Levels were marginally higher in the perindopril group than the enalapril group, although this difference was significant only in the second month (P < 0.025). Creatinine clearance was significantly lower in the perindopril group (0.44 +/- 0.05 mL/min) than in either the control rats (0.85 +/- 0.11 mL/min; P < 0.001) or the enalapril-treated group (0.66 +/- 0.05 mL/min; P < 0.005). Proteinuria was also lower in this group (4.3 +/- 0.9 mg/24h) than in the enalapril-treated (11.3 +/- 5.8 mg/24h; P < 0.05) or control groups (32.1 +/- 4.5 mg/24h; P < 0.0005). 4. The difference in efficacy between perindopril and enalapril that we have observed suggests that the benefits of ACE inhibition derive from changes in the concentrations of peptides catalysed by the C-terminal rather than the N-terminal site.