DIRECTIONAL OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY IMAGING OF MACULAR PATHOLOGY.

PURPOSE: To survey the impact of directional reflectivity on structures within optical coherence tomography images in retinal pathology. METHODS: Sets of commercial optical coherence tomography images taken from multiple pupil positions were analyzed. These directional optical coherence tomography sets revealed directionally reflective structures within the retina. After ensuring sufficient image quality, resulting hybrid and composite images were characterized by assessing the Henle fiber layer, outer nuclear layer, ellipsoid zone, and interdigitation zone. Additionally, hybrid images were reviewed for novel directionally reflective pathological features. RESULTS: Cross-sectional directional optical coherence tomography image sets were obtained in 75 eyes of 58 patients having a broad range of retinal pathologies. All cases showed improved visualization of the outer nuclear layer/Henle fiber layer interface, and outer nuclear layer thinning was, therefore, more apparent in several cases. The ellipsoid zone and interdigitation zone also demonstrated attenuation where a geometric impact of underlying pathology affected their orientation. Misdirected photoreceptors were also noted as a consistent direction-dependent change in ellipsoid zone reflectivity between regions of normal and absent ellipsoid zone. CONCLUSION: Directional optical coherence tomography enhances the understanding of retinal anatomy and pathology. This optical contrast yields more accurate identification of retinal structures and possible imaging biomarkers for photoreceptor-related pathology.

The reliability of parafoveal cone density measurements.

BACKGROUND: Adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscopy (AOSLO) enables direct visualisation of the cone mosaic, with metrics such as cone density and cell spacing used to assess the integrity or health of the mosaic. Here we examined the interobserver and inter-instrument reliability of cone density measurements. METHODS: For the interobserver reliability study, 30 subjects with no vision-limiting pathology were imaged. Three image sequences were acquired at a single parafoveal location and aligned to ensure that the three images were from the same retinal location. Ten observers used a semiautomated algorithm to identify the cones in each image, and this was repeated three times for each image. To assess inter-instrument reliability, 20 subjects were imaged at eight parafoveal locations on one AOSLO, followed by the same set of locations on the second AOSLO. A single observer manually aligned the pairs of images and used the semiautomated algorithm to identify the cones in each image. RESULTS: Based on a factorial study design model and a variance components model, the interobserver study's largest contribution to variability was the subject (95.72%) while the observer's contribution was only 1.03%. For the inter-instrument study, an average cone density intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of between 0.931 and 0.975 was calculated. CONCLUSIONS: With the AOSLOs used here, reliable cone density measurements can be obtained between observers and between instruments. Additional work is needed to determine how these results vary with differences in image quality.