Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 203(2): 202-210, 2021 01 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32757963

ABSTRACT

Rationale: Although early antimicrobial discontinuation guided by procalcitonin (PCT) has shown decreased antibiotic consumption in lower respiratory tract infections, the outcomes in long-term sepsis sequelae remain unclear.Objectives: To investigate if PCT guidance may reduce the incidence of long-term infection-associated adverse events in sepsis.Methods: In this multicenter trial, 266 patients with sepsis (by Sepsis-3 definitions) with lower respiratory tract infections, acute pyelonephritis, or primary bloodstream infection were randomized (1:1) to receive either PCT-guided discontinuation of antimicrobials or standard of care. The discontinuation criterion was ≥80% reduction in PCT levels or any PCT ≤0.5 µg/L at Day 5 or later. The primary outcome was the rate of infection-associated adverse events at Day 180, a composite of the incidence of any new infection by Clostridioides difficile or multidrug-resistant organisms, or any death attributed to baseline C. difficile or multidrug-resistant organism infection. Secondary outcomes included 28-day mortality, length of antibiotic therapy, and cost of hospitalization.Measurements and Main Results: The rate of infection-associated adverse events was 7.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.8-13.1%; 9/125) versus 15.3% (95% CI, 10.1-22.4%; 20/131) (hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.20-0.98; P = 0.045); 28-day mortality 15.2% (95% CI, 10-22.5%; 19/125) versus 28.2% (95% CI, 21.2-36.5%; 37/131) (hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.29-0.89; P = 0.02); and median length of antibiotic therapy 5 (range, 5-7) versus 10 (range, 7-15) days (P < 0.001) in the PCT and standard-of-care arms, respectively. The cost of hospitalization was also reduced in the PCT arm.Conclusions: In sepsis, PCT guidance was effective in reducing infection-associated adverse events, 28-day mortality, and cost of hospitalization.Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03333304).


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Clostridium Infections/prevention & control , Procalcitonin/blood , Sepsis/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Bacterial Agents/economics , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antimicrobial Stewardship , Biomarkers/blood , Clostridioides difficile , Clostridium Infections/epidemiology , Clostridium Infections/etiology , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Monitoring , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Greece , Hospital Costs , Hospitalization/economics , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Intention to Treat Analysis , Male , Middle Aged , Proportional Hazards Models , Sepsis/blood , Sepsis/complications , Sepsis/mortality , Single-Blind Method , Treatment Outcome
2.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 55(1): 105836, 2020 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31704213

ABSTRACT

Although analysis of retrospective studies has documented survival benefit from the addition of a macrolide to the treatment regimen for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), no data are available to determine if there is differential efficacy between members of the macrolide family. In order to investigate this, an analysis was undertaken of data from 1174 patients with CAP who met the new Sepsis-3 definitions and were enrolled prospectively in the data registry of the Hellenic Sepsis Study Group. Four well-matched treatment groups were identified with 130 patients per group: clarithromycin and ß-lactam; azithromycin and ß-lactam; respiratory fluoroquinolone and ß-lactam monotherapy. The primary endpoint was comparison of the effects of clarithromycin with ß-lactam monotherapy on 28-day mortality. The secondary endpoint was resolution of CAP. Mortality rates for the clarithromycin, azithromycin, respiratory fluoroquinolone and ß-lactam groups were 20.8%, 33.8% (P=0.026 vs clarithromycin), 32.3% (P=0.049 vs clarithromycin) and 36.2% (P=0.009 vs clarithromycin), respectively. After stepwise Cox regression analysis among all groups, clarithromycin was the only treatment modality associated with a favourable outcome (hazard ratio 0.61; P=0.021). CAP resolved in 73.1%, 65.9% (P=0.226 vs clarithromycin), 58.5% (P=0.009 vs clarithromycin) and 61.5% (P=0.046 vs clarithromycin) of patients, respectively. It is concluded that the addition of clarithromycin to the treatment regimen of patients with severe CAP leads to better survival rates.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Clarithromycin/toxicity , Community-Acquired Infections/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Bacterial/drug therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Azithromycin/therapeutic use , Clarithromycin/therapeutic use , Cohort Studies , Community-Acquired Infections/microbiology , Female , Fluoroquinolones/therapeutic use , Humans , Macrolides/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Pneumonia, Bacterial/microbiology , Treatment Outcome , beta-Lactams/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...