Evaluation of peripheral basophil activation during exercise provocation test for desensitized patients.

Some food allergic patients who have undergone oral immunotherapy develop exercise-induced allergic reactions on desensitization (EIARDs). This study investigated basophil activation status during the exercise provocation test (EPT) performed to diagnose EIARD. EPT was performed on 20 participants, and in vivo basophil activation status was analyzed using activation markers CD203c and CD63. The results showed that there was no significant difference between EPT-positive and negative subjects for basophil activation status throughout EPT. Consequently, in vivo basophil activation after ingestion of the causative food may not be associated with EIARDs. New tests are desired for predicting EIARDs.

[COMPARISON OF WHEAL SIZE INDUCED BY BIFURCATED NEEDLE® AND SMARTPRACTICE® PRICK LANCET].

BACKGROUND: There is reportedly a difference in the diameter of the skin reaction induced by different types of skin prick test (SPT) devices. We compared the SPT diagnostic accuracy and wheal size between a Bifurcated Needle® (BN) and SmartPractice® Prick Lancet (PL), which are commercially available in Japan. METHODS: An SPT was performed on 15 adults with and 10 without subjective symptoms of cedar pollinosis who wished to be examined for Japanese cedar pollen (JCP) sensitization. The SPT was performed blindly with a BN or PL with 10mg/ml of histamine dihydrochloride, 50% glycerosaline control, and JCP extract solution (TORII PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., Tokyo, Japan). The wheal sizes induced by the BN and PL were then compared. The JCP-specific IgE antibody titer was measured to compare the sensitivity and specificity of the SPT. RESULTS: Histamine wheal diameters were 6.0 (5.5-6.5) mm by BN and 6.0 (5.5-6.5) mm by PL (p=0.67), and none of the negative control solutions induced wheal. The respective sensitivity and specificity for cedar sensitization were 100% and 86% for BN, 100% and 79% for PL, and the areas under the ROC curve were 0.72 and 0.69 (p=0.32). CONCLUSION: The diagnostic accuracy of cedar pollen extract based on specific IgE-JCP sensitization and the diameter of the wheal produced by a BN and PL were considered equivalent.

A 60-minute dosing interval is safer than a 30- or 40-minute interval in oral food challenge.

BACKGROUND: The interval between antigen ingestion may influence the safety of oral food challenge tests (OFCs), especially in patients with severe food allergies. METHODS: This retrospective chart review of OFCs eliciting objective reactions to wheat, egg, and milk that were performed between April 2012 and January 2021 evaluated an equivalent number of low-dose OFCs performed at 30-, 40-, or 60-min intervals. To avoid the influence of the potential allergy severity of the patients, the prediction scores of all intervals were matched. We evaluated the total symptom score (TS), total ingested dose, and the proportions of severe reactions (TS ≥ 30) and adrenaline use. RESULTS: We analyzed 945 OFCs (wheat, n = 186; egg, n = 561; milk, n = 198). The 60-min OFC had significantly lower TS than the 30- and 40-min OFC methods in wheat (p < 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively), egg (p < 0.001 for both), and milk (p < 0.001 and p = 0.018, respectively). The total dose in the 60-min method was significantly lower than in the 30-min method (p < 0.001 for all). The proportion of severe reaction (TS ≥ 30) in the 60-min method was significantly lower than that in the 30-min method for the egg and milk OFCs (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). There was no difference in the rates of adrenaline injection. CONCLUSIONS: The 60-min interval is safer than 30- or 40-min intervals in wheat, egg, and milk OFCs in patients with a low threshold dose for food allergy.

Slow low-dose oral immunotherapy: Threshold and immunological change.

BACKGROUND: We examined the feasibility, efficacy and safety of slow low-dose oral immunotherapy (SLOIT) for egg, milk, wheat allergies, with accepted severity-stratified initial and maintenance doses. METHODS: Children with food allergies defined by low-dose oral food challenges (LD-OFCs) to hen's egg (cumulative protein dose up to 983 mg, n = 133), cow's milk (287 mg, n = 50), and wheat (226 mg, n = 45) were recruited. Participants were divided into two groups [SLOIT and control (complete avoidance]) based on their preferences. Participants who selected SLOIT were instructed to take the safe dose daily, with monthly increases, aiming to increase the dose by 10 times in one year. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants who passed the LD-OFCs following 1 year of therapy. RESULTS: The participants in SLOIT group ingested their antigen 92.9% of the therapy's day on average. The proportion of participants who passed LD-OFCs was 35.9% (61/170) in the SLOIT group and 8.7% (4/46) in the control group (P < .001); no large differences were observed among allergens. Among the subjects who failed LD-OFCs, the median change in the total dose in the LD-OFC was 235% (interquartile range: 100%-512%) in the SLOIT group and 100% (42%-235%) in the control group (P < .001). Provoked allergic symptoms were observed in only 0.58% (280/48,486) per programmed intake and approximately 50% of the SLOIT group did not experience any obvious allergic symptoms throughout therapy. CONCLUSIONS: SLOIT showed significant feasibility, efficacy and safety, providing a promising option to manage patients with severe food allergies.

Changes in passively-sensitized basophil activation to αS1-casein after oral immunotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Immune response to cow's milk allergen (CMA) has been analyzed mostly using crude milk antigen or a mixture of various caseins. This study aimed to assess the changes in the immunological response against αS1-casein during oral immunotherapy (OIT) and to investigate the mechanism of tolerance. METHODS: We have performed rush OIT to 39 patients with CMA and obtained the serum samples up to 3 years after OIT. Immunoglobulin E (IgE) and IgG4 antibodies specific to highly purified αS1-casein as well as passively-sensitized basophil activation were evaluated using the serial samples. Furthermore, we examined whether basophil activation led by the pre-OIT serum was suppressed by the post-OIT serum, or by the tolerant serum obtained from naturally outgrown patients. RESULTS: Specific IgE to αS1-casein was significantly reduced after OIT. Specific IgG4 (sIgG4) to αS1-casein was also detected in most of the pre-OIT sera, which was not significantly increased after OIT. Activation of passively-sensitized basophils to αS1-casein was significantly reduced after 2 years (14% ± 19%) and 3 years (19% ± 18%) post-OIT compared with pre-OIT (%CD63high basophils; 51% ± 27%). Furthermore, the addition of post-OIT or tolerant serum to pre-OIT serum significantly suppressed the basophil activation. This suppression was abrogated by washing the supernatant after passive sensitization, but not by depleting IgG antibodies from post-OIT or tolerant sera, nor by blocking FcγRIIb using an anti-FcγR antibody. CONCLUSIONS: αS1-casein-sIgG4 plays a minor role in tolerance mechanisms in cases of CMA; humoral factors other than antigen-sIgG4 may be involved.

Pediatric surgery triage: problems and improvements.

BACKGROUND: The Canadian Paediatric Triage and Acuity Scale (P-CTAS) is used and modified at hospitals as a triage tool for pediatric patients before they are seen in emergency rooms. Pediatric surgery patients account for very few of the many patients in emergency departments, but they should be triaged as emergency or urgent because they might be candidates for surgery. Problems with and improvements for triaging pediatric surgery patients using the P-CTAS were studied. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated all patients <16 years old who visited the emergency department of Kyorin University Hospital during an approximately 4 year period between 1 May 2005, and 11 February 2009. Pediatric surgery patients were divided into two groups to evaluate the efficiency of P-CTAS triage. Patients who needed emergency treatment were in group A, and the others were in group B. RESULTS: Most group A patients were level I, II, or III (97%, 111/114). In contrast, 60% (71/119) of group B patients were level IV or greater. Some problems with and suggestions for the P-CTAS were identified. Many patients with trauma were under 1 year of age, and many with a foreign body were under 2 years of age. Age categories should be added for patients with trauma or foreign body aspiration. Patients with abdominal pain, and without anal bleeding or vomiting who are >2 years old are triaged as level IV and they accounted for 12% of patients with possible intussusception in this study. A category of 'possible intussusception' should be made for level II. Most patients with acute scrotum, whether operated on or not, were level III. 'Red or purple color of scrotal skin' and/or 'within 6 h from onset' could be added to level II for patients with acute scrotum. CONCLUSIONS: P-CTAS worked well for pediatric surgery patients, and it needs to be modified and improved for such patients based on these results.

Successful endoscopic submucosal dissection for mucosal cancer of the duodenum.

We report a case of mucosal duodenal cancer in a 62-year-old woman, which was successfully removed en bloc by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The patient underwent an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy at our hospital, which revealed an elevated flat mucosal lesion (type IIa) measuring 10 mm in diameter in the second portion of the duodenum. Histopathological examination of a biopsy specimen revealed features suggestive of a tubulovillous adenoma with severe atypia. As the findings suggested that the lesion had an adenocarcinoma component but was confined to the mucosal layer, we decided to carry out ESD and successfully removed the tumor in one piece. The resected tumor was 20 x 15 mm in size. Histopathological examination revealed that the lesion was a well-differentiated mucosal adenocarcinoma with no lymphovascular invasion. Mucosal duodenal cancer is extremely rare, and ESD of a lesion in the duodenum requires a high level of skill. To the best of our knowledge, this case is the first report of successful ESD carried out in a case of mucosal duodenal cancer.