Granisetron versus tropisetron in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after total thyroidectomy.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are frequently encountered after thyroidectomy. For PONV prevention, selective serotonin 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonists are considered one of the first-line therapy. We report on the efficiency of granisetron and tropisetron, with that of placebo on the prevention of PONV in patients undergoing total thyroidectomy. METHODS: One hundred twenty-seven patients were divided into three groups and randomized to receive intravenously, prior to induction of anesthesia, tropisetron 5 mg, or granisetron 3 mg, or normal saline. All patients received additionally 0.625 mg droperidol. All episodes of postoperative PONV during the first 24 h after surgery were evaluated. RESULTS: Nausea visual analogue scale (VAS) score was lower in tropisetron and granisetron groups than the control group at all measurements (P<0.01) except for the 8-h measurement for tropisetron (P=0.075). Moreover, granisetron performed better than tropisetron (P<0.011 at 4 h and P<0.01 at all other points of time) apart from the 2-h measurement. Vomiting occurred in 22.2%, 27.5%, and 37.5% in granisetron, tropisetron, and control groups, respectively (P=0.43). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of the 5-HT3 antagonists with droperidol given before induction of anesthesia is well tolerated and superior to droperidol alone in preventing nausea but not vomiting after total thyroidectomy.

Sugammadex, a promising reversal drug. A review of clinical trials.

According to published data, sugammadex, rapidly reverses (2-5 min) shallow and profound NM block induced by rocuronium and vecuronium, without being connected with serious adverse events. It is accepted that in order to reverse shallow block, the suggested dose of sugammadex comes up to 2 mg/kg. Profound level of NM block demands 4 mg/kg in order to defy few responses at the post titanic count. Doses of sugammadex lower than 1 mg/kg may lead to rebound of rocuronium's effect. Higher doses of sugammadex (12 16 mg/g) are used in rescue reversal. In children and adolescents the 2 mg/kg dose is both effective and well tolerated, while, to date, data regarding infants are scarce. In patients with renal failure, 2 mg/kg of sugammadex resulted in a mean time to recovery of TOF ratio to 0.9 in 2 min, which was quicker than the time of reversal by acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. Investigations in cardiac patients undergoing noncardiac surgery suggest that 2 and 4 mg/kg of sugammadex are both safe and effective. Compared with neostigmine, sugammadex has no need to use muscarinic antagonists and therefore is not associated with variations in heart rate. Trials indicate that sugammadex acts faster than edrophonium and neostigmine. Sugammadex is a promising, well tolerated agent that enables fast reversal in different depths of NM block -shallow and profound- and in different patients populations. After completion of trial probation and settlement of issues concerning estimated cost and cost impact, it is believed to play a leading part in future anesthesiology.

Repeated intraperitoneal instillation of levobupivacaine for the management of pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the treatment of choice for symptomatic cholelithiasis. Postoperative pain, however, can prolong hospital stay and lead to increased morbidity. In the context of a multimodal approach to analgesia, intraperitoneal local anesthetic administration optimizes analgesia and facilitates early postoperative recovery, and it may be associated with a decreased risk of side effects. METHODS: A total of 71 patients was randomized to receive either intraperitoneal analgesic (IPA group) or not (controls). At the completion of cholecystectomy, 10 mL of levobupivacaine 0.5% were infused intraperitoneally in the IPA group and 8 h postoperatively, whereas in the controls, 10 mL of 0.9% NaCl were administered in the corresponding points of time. Differences in pain scores between groups were the primary endpoints. Opioid consumption and adverse effects were the secondary endpoints. RESULTS: The 2 groups were homogenous in respect to age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and duration of operation. No conversion, complication, or mortality was recorded. The IPA group had a lesser visual analog scale score at rest and at movement compared with controls at all points of time measured. Moreover, fentanyl consumption in the recovery room was significantly greater in the control group, and the consumption of meperidine and the percentage of the patients that requested rescue analgesia in the ward was significantly greater in the control group. Local analgesic intraperitoneal injection as well as parecoxib for postoperative analgesia had no significant adverse effects. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that 2 separate doses of intraperitoneally administered levobupivacaine significantly decreased postoperative pain and the need for opioids compared with placebo. This technique is simple, safe, and without adverse effects.