ABSTRACT
Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) cruciferin (12S globulin), napin (2S albumin) and lipid transfer proteins (LTP) were purified at a multi-g scale. The procedure developed was simple, rather fast and resolutive; it permitted the recovery of these proteins with a good yield, such as 40% for cruciferin and 18% for napin. Nanofiltration eliminated the major phenolic compounds. The remaining protein fraction was fractionated by cation exchange chromatography (CEC) on a streamline SP-XL column in alkaline conditions. The unbound neutral cruciferin was polished by size exclusion chromatography. The alkaline napin isoforms and LTP, adsorbed on the beads, were eluted as a whole fraction and further separated by an other CEC step at acidic pH. Napins were polished by hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC). The fractions were characterized by reverse phase HPLC, electrophoresis, N-terminal sequencing and mass spectrometry. All the fractions contained less than 5% of impurities.
Subject(s)
Brassica napus/chemistry , Carrier Proteins/isolation & purification , Plant Proteins/isolation & purification , 2S Albumins, Plant , Allergens , Amino Acid Sequence , Antigens, Plant , Chromatography, Gel , Chromatography, Ion Exchange/methods , Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel , Protein Isoforms/isolation & purification , Seed Storage Proteins , UltracentrifugationABSTRACT
Lysyl residues of rapeseed napin (2S) and cruciferin (12S) were acylated and sulfamidated by means of anhydrides and sulfonyl chlorides, respectively. The secondary and tertiary structures as well as the surface hydrophobicity of the modified proteins were studied using circular dichroism, intrinsic fluorescence, and binding of anilinonaphthalenesulfonic acid. The results showed clearly that grafting of hydrophobic chains induced different structural modifications and surface hydrophobicities on the monomeric (2S) and on the hexameric (12S) proteins. Thus, the original structure of the 2S modified protein seemed to be preserved. Therefore, the surface hydrophobicity increased proportionally with the number of groups grafted. Conversely, after modification, 12S was shown to be expanded. As a result, hydrophobic regions were exposed, leading to a much greater hydrophobization of the protein surface. Acylation and sulfamidation appeared, therefore, to be good methods to hydrophobize efficiently the surface of the two proteins and thus might probably induce new functional properties.
