Acetabular Fracture Outcomes and Complications: An International Comparison.

Introduction: Despite the groundbreaking research by Judet and Letournel in the 1960s, the specific equipment, surgical approach, fixation strategy, and post-operative course for treating acetabular fractures have not been standardized. Therefore, this study aimed to compare technological resources, operative procedures, and post-operative complications between patients treated for acetabular fractures in Romania and the United States (U.S.). Methods: Between February 2011 and August 2018, a total of 116 Romanian patients and 373 U.S. patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation for acetabular fractures. Data were collected prospectively for Romania and retrospectively for the U.S. The authors used T-tests, Fisher's exact tests, and odds ratios to analyze categorical data while ordinal date were assessed using logistic regression. Results: U.S. patients had higher comorbidity rates for diabetes, obesity, and hypertension. However, the initial quality of reduction, graded with Matta's criteria, was similar between American and Romanian patients. Post-operatively, U.S. patients had significantly higher Brooker criteria scores for heterotopic ossification. Rates of deep vein thrombosis, infections, sciatic nerve lesions, and loss of reduction between the two countries were not significantly different. Conclusions: Given the similar initial reduction quality despite technological differences, the authors suggest that fundamental factors, such as surgeon training and experience, may have a greater impact than the availability of technologically advanced operative resources. Future research focusing on the efficacy of these advanced resources for acetabular fracture fixation could help determine their true impact on patient outcomes and improve the cost-effectiveness of this surgery.

Managing Post-Operative Pain in Orthopedic Patients: An International Comparison.

Introduction: Opioids play a crucial role in post-operative pain management in America, but not in some other countries. We sought to determine if a discrepancy in opioid use between the United States (U.S.) and Romania, a country that administers opioids in a conservative fashion, would show in subjective pain control differences. Methods: Between May 23, 2019, and November 23, 2019, 244 Romanian patients and 184 American patients underwent total hip arthroplasty or the surgical treatment of the following fractures: bimalleolar ankle, distal radius, femoral neck, intertrochanteric, and tibial-fibular. Opioid and non-opioid analgesic medication use and subjective pain scores during the first and second 24 hours after surgery were analyzed. Results: Subjective pain scores for the first 24 hours were higher among patients in Romania compared to the U.S. (p < 0.0001), but Romanians reported lower pain scores than U.S. patients in the second 24-hours (p < 0.0001). The quantity of opioids given to U.S. patients did not differ significantly based on sex (p = 0.4258) or age (p = 0.0975). However, females reported higher pain scores than male patients following the studied procedures (p = 0.0181). No sex-based differences in pain scores were noted among Romanian patients. Conclusions: Higher pain scores in American females, despite equivalent amounts of narcotics to their male counterparts, and the absence of a difference in Romanians suggested that the current American post-operative pain regimen may be tailored to the needs of male patients. In addition, it pointed to the impacts of gender, compared to sex, in pain experiences. Future research should look for the safest, most efficacious pain regimen suitable for all patients.

Trends in the Staff's Perception of Patient Safety Culture in Romanian Hospitals.

INTRODUCTION: The IRIS-2 project (2019) expanded the application of the HSOPSC in Romanian hospitals, yet applied, for the first time in the country, in 2014 (IRIS-1). The aim is an update on patient safety culture for staff, by geographic region and overall, by year of survey. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out in voluntary staff in four hospitals in four regions (n. 1,121 staff) and compared with a previous study based on six hospitals in four regions (n. 969 staff). The instrument was the Romanian version of the HSOPSC with 31 items and 9 dimensions. Statistics to analyze trend were computed using "R". Results No significant differences between the proportion of positive response (PPRs) by dimension were observed in IRIS-2 with respect to IRIS-1, with two exceptions: significantly lower PPR for "teamwork across hospital units" (65% versus 73%) and significantly higher PPR for "frequency of events reporting" (65% versus 59%). Four dimensions were well developed and five dimensions needed to be improved. The poorest PPRs were for the "teamwork across hospital units", the "frequency of event reporting" and the "non punitive response to error" dimensions. Besides, one outcome indicator changed through time: the proportion of the staff who did not report any event was significantly lower (64% versus 73%) and the proportion of the staff who reported "1-2 events" was significantly higher (21% versus 15%). CONCLUSION: Despite some small progress related to the frequency of events reporting, there is room for further patient safety culture improvement.