Systemic vascular photobiomodulation accelerates the recovery of motor activity in rats following spinal cord injury.

OBJECTIVES: Spinal cord injury (SCI) causes the discontinuity of the spinal canal, leading to functional and sensorial losses in areas below the injury, which are often irreversible. Photobiomodulation (PBM) can enhance the neuromuscular repair process, especially in cases of peripheral nerve injuries. However, there is little knowledge regarding the effects of this therapeutic modality on recovery following a SCI, especially the noninvasive systemic form denominated vascular PBM (VPBM). To analyze the effects of VPBM in the immediate, acute and intermediate phases following a compression-induced SCI on morphological aspects of neuromuscular tissue repair, functional recovery and the protein expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). METHODS: Wistar rats were divided into five groups: control, SCI, SCI + VPBM-Im (immediate administration of VPBM), SCI + VPBM-2h (VPBM administered 2 h after injury) and SCI + VPBM-14d (VPBM administered 14 days after injury). VPBM was administered in the region of the caudal vein/artery with low-level laser (AsGaAl, 780 nm, 80 J/cm², 40 mW for 80 s, totaling an energy of 3.2 J over a single point) for 14 consecutive days. During the analysis periods (1, 3, 7, 14, 21, 28 and 35 days after injury), functioning was evaluated using the Basso-Beattie-Bresnahan (BBB) index. At the end of each experimental period, blood samples were collected for the determination of the concentration of circulating BDNF using ELISA. Muscle tissue and nerve tissue samples were also extracted for morphological and histological analyses using H&E staining. RESULTS: SCI + VPBM-Im and SCI + VPBM-2 h led to the recovery of motor function beginning on the 7th day after injury (p < 0.05), an increase in the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the muscle fibers in the second week (p < 0.05) and an increase in muscle fiber diameter beginning on Day 14 (p < 0.05). Early irradiation had a greater effect on the reduction in the size of the cavity, with stabilization of the cavity found on Day 7 (p < 0.05). Considering the circulating BDNF levels, no changes was found during the experimental periods. CONCLUSION: The present results showed that VPBM was capable of modulating morphological and functional recovery following SCI, especially when administered early. The positive effects on functional recovery were demonstrated by the BBB index; the reestablishment of the structure of the muscle and nerve tissue was demonstrated by the preservation of CSA and diameter of muscle fiber and reduction in the area of the injury (cavity size) respectively. Thus, noninvasive VPBM may be an important component of treatment for spinal cord injuries.

Efficacy and safety of electrical stimulation in the treatment of neurogenic bladder dysfunction in myelomeningocele-Systematic review of randomized clinical trials.

AIMS: The purpose of this systematic review was to investigate and synthesize the effects (benefits and harms) of electrical stimulation (EE), alone or in association with other interventions, compared with sham and other interventions, for the treatment of neurogenic bladder dysfunction in myelomeningocele. METHODS: This systematic review was conducted following the methodological recommendations of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and registered at PROSPERO (CRD42020200425). A search was performed in the following electronic databases: MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, LILACS, and PEDro. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that assessed any EE in children diagnosed with myelomeningocele and neurogenic bladder and/or urinary incontinence were included and reported. RESULTS: When comparing EE versus sham groups, some estimated effects showed a wide confidence interval, probably due to the small sample size of the included studies. This indicates an imprecision in these findings. Regarding the safety of this intervention and safety of the lower urinary tract, no adverse events resulting from EE were reported. All the included studies have evaluated the efficacy of EE compared with sham, but different EE parameters and electrode positions among studies make it impossible to perform a meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Based on very low certainty evidence, the findings of this systematic review suggested no difference between EE and sham to improve urinary incontinence in children with myelomeningocele. However, the small sample size and the imprecision arising from the wide confidence intervals must be considered. Future RCTs following a rigorous methodology, as recommended by the CONSORT statement, should be conducted to support the use of this intervention in clinical practice.