Validation of the PHEEM instrument in a Danish hospital setting.

The Postgraduate Hospital Educational Environment Measure (PHEEM) has been translated into Danish and then validated with good internal consistency by 342 Danish junior and senior hospital doctors. Four of the 40 items are culturally dependent in the Danish hospital setting. Factor analysis demonstrated that seven items are interconnected. This information can be used to shorten the instrument by perhaps another three items.

Use of 360-degree assessment of residents in internal medicine in a Danish setting: a feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to explore the feasibility of 360 degree assessment in early specialist training in a Danish setting. Present Danish postgraduate training requires assessment of specific learning objectives. Residency in Internal Medicine was chosen for the study. It has 65 learning objectives to be assessed. We considered 22 of these suitable for assessment by 360-degrees assessment. METHODS: Medical departments of six hospitals contributed 42 interns to the study. Each resident was assessed by ten persons of whom one was a secretary, four were nurses and five senior doctors. The assessors spent 14.5 minutes (median) to fill in the forms. RESULTS: Of the 22 chosen objectives, 15 could reliably be assessed by doctors, 7 by nurses and none by secretaries. CONCLUSIONS: The method was practical in busy clinical departments and was well accepted by the assessors. Reliability of the method was acceptable. It discrimintated satisfactorily between the good and not so good performers.

Prescribing of acid suppressive therapy: interactions between hospital and primary care.

BACKGROUND: Overuse of acid suppressive therapy in the hospital setting and in primary care is well documented. AIM: To describe interactions between prescriptions of acid suppressive therapy in hospital and in primary care. METHODS: All patients admitted to hospital over a 24-month period were identified. Details about prescription of acid suppressive therapy were retrieved. All prescriptions of acid suppressive therapy redeemed by these patients 12 months before and after discharge were retrieved from a prescription database. RESULTS: A total of 549 of 4477 patients (12.3%) were treated with acid suppressive therapy while in hospital, but acid suppressive therapy was prescribed de novo in only 192 (35%) of these cases. Information about indication for acid suppressive therapy and planned duration of therapy were given in the discharge letter in only 25% and 17% of the cases, respectively. Among patients treated with acid suppressive therapy during admission, prescriptions on acid suppressive therapy were redeemed by 67% in the year before admission and by 74% in the year after discharge. Among patients who had the acid suppressive therapy discontinued during admission (n = 67), 48% resumed acid suppressive therapy within the following 12 months. Of all subjects treated with acid suppressive therapy in the hospital catchment area, 7.8% were seen in our department. CONCLUSIONS: Decisions about acid suppressive therapy prescribing in hospital has little influence on prescribing in primary care.

Dynamics of albumin in plasma and ascitic fluid in patients with cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To determine dynamics of albumin in plasma and ascitic fluid of patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: Forty-seven patients were classified in four groups: I--patients without fluid retention; II--patients with ascites not resistant to subsequent diuretic treatment; III--recompensated patients during diuretic treatment; and IV--patients with diuretic-resistant ascites. Transvascular and transperitoneal albumin transports were quantified by 131I-/125I-labelled human albumin. RESULTS: TER(P) (i.e. the fraction of intravascular albumin (IVM) passing from plasma into the interstitial space per hour) was increased in all groups. In group IV patients the transport rate of albumin from plasma into the ascitic fluid (TER(PA)) was significantly higher than the transport rate from the ascitic fluid back into the plasma: TER(AP) (0.45 vs. 0.26% IVM/h, P < 0.002). In group II patients TER(PA) was similar to TER(AP) (0.27 vs. 0.25% IVM/h, ns). A direct correlation was found between TER(PA) and TER(AP) in both groups of patients (r = 0.78, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In non-resistant ascites, there is a steady state between the transport of albumin into the peritoneal cavity and back into the plasma, but in resistant ascites the former transport is elevated. Thus, local factors may be important to treatment of ascites.

[Celiac disease in adults]. / Cøliaki hos voksne.

Studies from western countries have shown that coeliac disease (CD) is common with prevalence figures about 1:300. The clinical spectrum varies greatly, steatorrhoea and weight loss affecting less than half of the patients. CD should be suspected in case of positive gliadin (IgA and IgG) and endomysial (IgA) antibodies. The diagnosis is based upon histological examination of duodenal biopsies taken during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Most patients respond quickly and satisfactorily to treatment with a gluten-free diet. This treatment also eliminates the excess risk of small bowel malignancy. Screening among first degree relatives and patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus should be considered.

[Euricterus. A European database on icterus with emphasis on the Danish contribution]. / Euricterus. En europaeisk icterusdatabase med fokus på den danske andel.

Clinical and biochemical data were collected prospectively from 8032 jaundiced patients to form a database as part of a EU-supported project on computer-aided diagnosis. Patients were recruited prospectively from centres in all EU-countries and some other countries as well. Five hundred and twenty-eight jaundiced patients were collected from four centres in Denmark. Alcoholic cirrhosis, acute alcoholic liver disease and malignancy of the pancreas or the biliary tract were more common in the Danish data base: 49% of cases in Denmark as compared to 30% of cases in the international database. Viral hepatitis was underrepresented in Denmark, 16% as compared to 23% in the international group. A crude Bayesian diagnostic programme on the total database with 17 diagnostic groups achieved 63% accuracy. For the 528 Danish cases the diagnostic accuracy was 64% when the European data base was used, whereas it increased to 81% when only the Danish data base was taken as basis for the calculations. In conclusion, we found a drop in diagnostic accuracy for the Danish patients when using the large European data base instead of the national one.

Predicting endoscopic diagnosis in the dyspeptic patient. The value of predictive score models.

BACKGROUND: Score models to predict endoscopic diagnosis in dyspepsia may compensate for the unreliable clinical diagnosis. This study aimed to construct and test score models designed to predict diagnosis in dyspepstic patients managed in primary care. METHODS: Three models to predict organic dyspepsia, major dyspepsia, or peptic ulcer were constructed by regression analysis of clinical data from 1026 consecutive dyspeptic patients referred for endoscopy. The models were tested in 207 patients in primary care, who were potential candidates for endoscopy. Validation experiments were analysed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: Significant losses of predictive power were found for all models when applied to primary care patients, and no model could be used as a reliable decision support instrument in primary care. CONCLUSIONS: Predictive score models developed in patients referred for endoscopy are not reliable when applied to patients in primary care who are potential candidates for endoscopy. Future models should be constructed and validated in unselected primary care populations.

Predicting endoscopic diagnosis in the dyspeptic patient: the value of clinical judgement.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the quality of chance-corrected clinical diagnosis in two groups of dyspeptic patients, using endoscopy as the diagnostic standard. DESIGN: Structured interview before endoscopy and clinical predictions of endoscopic diagnosis as either malignancy, peptic ulcer, oesophagitis or non-ulcer dyspepsia. The quality of the predictions was corrected for chance using iota-correction. Patients gave a provisional prediction of their own endoscopic diagnosis. SETTING: Two endoscopy units in Odense and Svendborg, Denmark. PATIENTS: Two groups of dyspeptic outpatients: (1) 1026 patients referred for open-access endoscopy and (2) 207 empirically managed patients randomly assigned to prompt endoscopy as part of a clinical trial. RESULTS: The overall diagnostic validity for all diagnoses was equal in the two groups of patients (57 and 59%) and was mainly accounted for by positive predictive values for non-ulcer dyspepsia of 75%. Elimination of random accuracy for non-ulcer dyspepsia showed a validity of only 23 and 21%. Patients with a major pathologic lesion (cancer, ulcer, complicated oesophagitis) were misclassified clinically as non-ulcer dyspepsia in 36 and 38% of cases. The sensitivity of a clinical prediction of ulcer was only 52 and 36%, despite positive predictive values of 34%, and most valid when corrected for chance in the group of patients referred for open-access endoscopy. The patients' provisional diagnoses had no predictive value. CONCLUSION: Clinical diagnosis in dyspepsia was unreliable as it misclassified one-third of patients with a major pathological lesion. Fifty percent of patients with ulcer were misclassified and that clinical diagnosis could only be confirmed in one-third of the cases. The chance-corrected validity of non-ulcer dyspepsia was only slightly better than chance. There was no predictive value of the patients' predictions of their own diagnosis.

Computer-assisted diagnosis in gastroenterology.

During the last 20 years, Danish gastroenterologists and biostatisticians have been involved in practical and theoretical research aimed at providing computer-assisted decision support in clinical practice. On the practical side, we summarize two clinical applications, one in the acute abdomen, the other in jaundice. The former project is part of a worldwide effort which appears able to reduce considerably the perforated appendix rate and the negative laparotomy rate. In the latter project, also entwined in international activities, three methods of early statistical discrimination of jaundice causes have been tested, and it has been shown how ultrasonographic data can be incorporated into the diagnostic assessment. On the theoretical side, a Dutch-Danish group has been looking into how one best designs a trial and analyses its data in the context of measuring the quality and impact of machine-made diagnostic advice. Having pointed out the international ramifications of these activities, we outline what may lie ahead: Gastroenterologists must be prepared to join large-scale field trials of clinical advice-giving software. In the future, however, such software will often become embedded in general hospital recordkeeping systems.

Junior staff experience with a decision aid for differential diagnosis of jaundice.

The Copenhagen pocket diagnostic chart can be used for early differentiation between obstructive and non-obstructive causes of jaundice. We present a reevaluation of the chart being used by a recently graduated physician and by two medical students. Non-error rates of 84-87% were found indicating that the students and the physician performed equally well. As to the observer error, the students and the physician typically differed on 0-2 of the chart's 21 items. This disagreement did not lead to a confident obstructive diagnosis being changed into a diagnosis of non-obstruction, or vice versa.

Ultrasound examination in jaundiced patients. Is computer-assisted preclassification helpful?

In this study we attempted to determine the diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility of ultrasonography (US) for jaundice and to see how US can best be combined with preliminary clinical-biochemical diagnoses to plan the invasive work-up. US proved reproducible in two diagnostic departments (127 agreements in 135 cases). But, since obstruction was underdiagnosed (15 double-false negatives), the predictive value of a negative result was only 0.83. By adding a term which represents the US conclusion, obstruction or not, to the Copenhagen pocket diagnostic chart score (based on the logistic model) we found that an obstructive conclusion increases the odds of obstruction by a factor of 25, and a non-obstructive conclusion decreases the odds by a factor of only 1.9. We conclude that the preliminary diagnosis is frequently sufficiently certain to be unalterable by US. This leaves only 40% of the jaundice cases in which US is necessary to plan invasive work-up. The US workload can even, it appears, be reduced to about 22% without appreciable penalty in terms of unrewarding invasive procedures. Using these strict indications, four US examinations seem to suffice to avoid one such error. Relying on either US or clinical-biochemical data alone is inferior to the combined strategy.

Use of computers in diagnosis of jaundice.

The development of computer-assisted diagnostic systems for the differential diagnosis of jaundice has been attempted in several studies during the last 25-30 years. All working systems have depended on numerical methods whereas expert systems have not yet become operational. The first step in the construction of a system is the collection of a data base from a series of jaundiced patients of clinical information (indicants) i.e. symptoms, signs, and the results from laboratory tests. The best discriminating indicants are selected and processed into a mathematical rule. The performance of this rule must be tested on an independent test sample of relevant patients. The performance may also be compared to that of clinicians. So far the computerized diagnoses have not been more accurate than those of clinicians. However, computer-assisted diagnostics may form an important first step in clinical decision making regarding the selection of a confirmatory diagnostic test (direct cholangiography, ultrasonography, liver biopsy, etc.) in the evaluation of the jaundiced patient.

A decision tree for early differentiation between obstructive and non-obstructive jaundice.

We present a method for early differentiation between obstructive and non-obstructive jaundice. On the basis of 14 variables (clinical data and clinical chemical tests, all available within 48 h) a simple decision tree or flow chart has been constructed. The diagnostic yield was as follows: 857 of 982 consecutive jaundiced patients (87%) in a data base and 98 of 108 patients in an independent test sample (91%) were correctly classified. Decision trees for the differentiation between benign or malignant causes within the obstructive group and between acute or chronic causes within the non-obstructive group are also presented. The resulting four-way classification was correct for 77% of the patients in the data base and for 72% of the patients in the test sample. The decision trees are compared with previous methods founded on Bayes' rule and logistic discrimination. The decision trees enable a quick and reliable classification of jaundiced patients, thus providing a valid basis for rational planning of the further diagnostic study.

Differential diagnosis of jaundice: junior staff experience with the Copenhagen pocket chart.

Originally published in 1984, the Copenhagen Pocket Chart for early differentiation between causes of jaundice has been tested with success in centres outside Denmark. Using a logistic discrimination model, it estimates probabilities of obstruction and non-obstruction in each case (and provides a further subdivision if desired). Here we evaluate its performance in the hands of young clinicians on a consecutive series of 173 jaundiced patients from two Danish hospitals. The chart performed as well as in the original series: confident diagnoses (probability greater than or equal to 0.80) were assigned to 124 patients; of these 115 proved correct (93%). In 46 patients diagnostic probabilities were less than 0.80, and 3 patients had an unknown cause of jaundice. There were 108 cases in which physician and chart were in agreement, both with a confident diagnosis, and only one of these cases was wrong. In one hospital, contributing 107 cases, each patient was independently examined by a medical student in addition to the physician's examination. Student performance was equally good, practically speaking, in particular when taking the scores on the chart into consideration. As to observer disagreement, the student and the physician typically differed on 0-2 of the chart's 21 items. In no case, however, did this lead to a confident obstructive diagnosis being changed into a confident diagnosis of non-obstruction, or vice versa.

Does sucralfate reduce acetylsalicylic-acid-induced gastric mucosal bleeding?

We studied the possible protection of sucralfate with regard to acetylsalicylic acid (ASA)-induced gastric mucosal bleeding as measured by a radiochromium assay of faecal blood loss in a double-blind crossover study involving 16 healthy male volunteers. Medication was given in two combinations during the 2nd and 5th week of the study: 1 g ASA and 1 g sucralfate four times daily, or 1 g ASA four times daily and placebo tablets. Mean faecal blood loss (+/- SEM) was 0.38 +/- 0.04 ml/day in the 1st week (no drugs administered), 7.17 +/- 1.60 ml/day during treatment with ASA + sucralfate, and 9.59 +/- 1.76 ml/day during treatment with ASA + placebo, the difference being not statistically significant. Individual bleeding values registered during sucralfate treatment correlated with those measured in the placebo period. However, three persons with pronounced bleeding after ASA + placebo had minimal bleeding after ASA + sucralfate. Sucralfate may have a protective potential by reducing ASA-induced gastric mucosal bleeding, but further studies are required to evaluate its protective mechanisms and to identify the groups of patients that could benefit from this.

Differential diagnosis of jaundice: applicability of the Copenhagen Pocket Chart proved in Stockholm patients.

This paper shows that an algorithm for differential diagnosis of jaundice developed in Denmark has been successfully transferred for use in a Swedish hospital. The algorithm, which is based on data from nearly 1000 patients, utilises 21 items of information from the medical history, physical examination and blood chemistry. The algorithm recognises four diagnostic groups: benign obstructive jaundice, malignant obstructive jaundice, acute non-obstructive jaundice, and chronic non-obstructive jaundice. To each item of information, a score is attached reflecting its weight of evidence. Summing the scores for the symptoms and signs that are present leads to a probabilistic statement about the diagnosis. Because of missing data in the Swedish patient material, three of the items were excluded from the original algorithm. Corrections were made for differences in the distribution of diseases. In reclassification of 985 Danish patients the modified algorithm's "best bid", i.e. the diagnosis given the highest probability, was correct in 78% of cases. More important, 93% of the cases given a "confident" diagnosis (probability greater than 0.80) were correct. The corresponding figures when the algorithm was applied to Swedish patients were 76% and 93%, respectively. In both series the predicted probabilities were matched by a corresponding proportion of actual diagnostic hits. It is concluded that the algorithm leads to reliable estimates of diagnostic probabilities in jaundice and that the algorithm seems to work well in Sweden also.