Surgical removal of occluder devices: complications and pitfalls.

Interventional closures of atrial septal defects (ASDs) and paravalvular leaks represent attractive treatment options to prevent surgical procedures. Nevertheless, a small number of complications or pitfalls remain after interventional closure of ASDs or paravalvular leaks that require surgical therapy. We report on 3 cases in which surgery was necessary after attempts to close a paravalvular leak. A mechanical valve prosthesis in the mitral position was explanted from a 73-year-old man because of increasing hemolysis and restriction of the motion of one leaflet by the occluder device. A 21-year-old woman with 3 previous surgeries for truncus arteriosus communis type 1 developed paravalvular leakage after replacements of the pulmonary and aortic valves. Although aortic insufficiency was reduced to grade I by placing 2 Amplatzer occluders, significant hemolysis developed. A 24-year-old woman had previously undergone 3 cardiac surgeries (commissurotomy at the age of 5 years for aortic stenosis, followed by aortic valve replacements at 13 and 14 years of age). The patient developed severe hemolysis after interventional closure. A redo aortic valve replacement was performed for the fourth time. As in the previous 2 cases, the surgery for this challenging case and the postoperative course went well. We also present 6 cases in which the occluder was explanted because of dislocation, thrombus formation, irritation of the aortic root, or systemic allergic reaction to the percutaneous occluder after initial closure of the ASD. The intra- and postoperative courses were uneventful in all cases. In summary, surgery for complications or pitfalls after interventional closure of paravalvular leaks or ASDs is challenging and carries a high risk in cases of paravalvular leaks. Nevertheless, the outcomes of the presented cases were uneventful. In the future, the development of a more suitable device technology may improve the results of interventional procedures, especially in cases of paravalvular leaks.

Impact of prior percutaneous coronary intervention on the outcome of coronary artery bypass surgery: a multicenter analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Do prior percutaneous coronary interventions adversely affect the outcome of subsequent coronary artery bypass grafting? We investigated this effect on a multicenter basis. METHODS: Eight cardiac surgical centers provided outcome data of 37,140 consecutive patients who underwent isolated first-time coronary bypass grafting between January 2000 and December 2005. Twenty-two patient characteristics and outcome variables were retrieved. Three groups of patients were analysed for in-hospital mortality and in-hospital major adverse cardiac events: patients without a previous percutaneous coronary intervention, with 1 previous intervention, and with 2 or more previous percutaneous coronary interventions before bypass grafting. A total of 29,928 patients with complete information for prior percutaneous coronary intervention underwent final analysis. Unadjusted univariate and risk-adjusted multivariate logistic regression analysis as well as computed propensity score matching were performed, based on 14 major risk factors to correct for and minimize selection bias. RESULTS: A total of 10.3% of patients had 1 previous percutaneous coronary intervention, and 3.7% of patients had 2 or more previous interventions. Risk-adjusted multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed a significant association of 2 or more previous percutaneous coronary interventions with in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR], 2.0; confidence interval [CI], 1.4-3.0; P = .0005) and major adverse cardiac events (OR, 1.5; CI, 1.2-1.9; P = .0013). After propensity score matching, conditional logistic regression analysis confirmed the results of adjusted analysis. A history of 2 or more previous percutaneous coronary interventions was significantly associated with in-hospital mortality (OR, 1.9; CI, 1.3-2.7; P = .0016) and major adverse cardiac events (OR, 1.5; CI, 1.2-1.9; P = .0019). CONCLUSIONS: Multicenter analysis confirms that a history of multiple previous percutaneous coronary interventions increases in-hospital mortality and the incidence of major adverse cardiac events after subsequent coronary artery bypass grafting. Critical discussion of the treatment strategy in these patients is warranted.

Simultaneous aortic and mitral valve replacement in octogenarians: a viable option?

BACKGROUND: Few reliable data are available on clinical outcome of octogenarians undergoing simultaneous aortic and mitral valve replacement. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 55 patients aged 80 years and over with double valve replacement who were operated on at our institution between 2001 and 2005. Thirty-day mortality and 1-year survival were assessed. RESULTS: For most of the patients, stenosis was the cause of aortic valve surgery, whereas regurgitation was the cause of mitral valve replacement in the majority of patients. In one third of the patients, cardiac surgery had to be performed on an urgent/emergency basis. A large number of patients had concomitant diagnoses such as atrial fibrillation (73%), coronary artery disease (44%), renal insufficiency (29%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (20%), and diabetes mellitus (15%). In total, 16 patients (29%) died during follow-up. Survival rates at 30 days and 1 year were 91% and 71%, respectively. As determined by multivariable logistic regression analysis, Karnofsky performance status (hazard ratio: 0.899 per % increase; 95% confidence interval: 0.811 to 0.996; p = 0.043) and bypass time (hazard ratio: 1.062 per min; 95% confidence interval: 1.006 to 1.120; p = 0.028) were independent predictors of 30-day mortality. Beside these factors, additional independent predictors of 1-year mortality were preoperative stroke and postoperative intestinal failure (p = 0.008 and 0.003, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that, for selected octogenarians, double valve replacement can be performed with acceptable outcome. A better performance status of the patients at the time of cardiac surgery will probably improve 1-year survival.

Plasma protein binding properties to immobilized heparin and heparin-albumin conjugate.

Selective adhesion of plasma proteins to immobilized heparin is considered to be beneficial regarding hemocompatibility of foreign materials in contact with blood. Prothrombin, thrombin, antithrombin III (AT3), and fibrinogen were selected for analysis in an experimental model. Biomolecular interaction analysis employing surface plasmon resonance was utilized to record and analyze their binding properties in real time. Biotinylated heparin, heparin-albumin conjugate, and albumin, respectively, were immobilized onto streptavidin-coated sensors as ligands. Prothrombin did not bind to any of the ligand surfaces and no specific binding of any of the plasma proteins to albumin was observed. Binding kinetics of thrombin to heparin and to heparin-albumin conjugate were calculated using two different methods. For heparin, identical K(D)(equilibrium dissociation constant) values of 61 x 10(-9) M were obtained with both methods. For the conjugate, only slightly different K(D) values of 111 x 10(-9) and 104 x 10(-9) M, respectively, were calculated. The affinity of thrombin toward the heparin-coated surface proved to be higher than its affinity toward the heparin conjugate. The binding pattern of AT3 to both heparin and heparin-albumin conjugate, although specific, was biphasic, possibly due to a conformational change during the binding process. Steady-state kinetic analysis revealed a K(D) value of 281 +/- 24 x 10(-9) M for the heparin surface. For the conjugate surface, a K(D) of 53 +/- 5 x 10(-9) M was calculated, indicating a higher affinity toward heparin-albumin conjugate. A high-affinity binding of fibrinogen to high-density surfaces of both heparin and the conjugate was observed. However, as binding to low-density surfaces was considerably reduced, specificity remained uncertain.

[Surgical management of aortic valve stenosis]. / Standardtherapie der Aortenklappenstenose. Indikation und Ergebnisse.

This paper gives an overview of the indications for surgical therapy of aortic valve stenosis. The current surgical management and the results of aortic valve replacement are outlined. The presented results of aortic valve replacement especially in elderly and high-risk patients compare favorably with other published data in respect to perioperative morbidity and mortality. All newly developed procedures for the treatment of aortic stenosis therefore will have to prove their superiority in future.

Tricuspid valve replacement: clinical long-term results for acquired isolated tricuspid valve regurgitation.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Acquired isolated tricuspid valve insufficiency (TVI) is a rare condition, and tricuspid valve replacement (TVR) is reserved for those patients in whom operative repair is not possible. The long-term follow up of patients who underwent isolated TVR at the authors' institution was analyzed. METHODS: All patients (n = 107) who underwent TVR between January 1985 and December 2002 were identified from a clinical database. Among 87 multiple valve replacements, 20 consecutive patients (12 females, eight males; mean age 52.4 years) were encountered who underwent TVR for acquired isolated TVI. Preoperative and perioperative data were recorded retrospectively. The patients and/or their physicians were contacted directly to determine long-term outcome; the follow up was 100% complete. RESULTS: The mean follow up period was 40.8 months (range: 1-211 months). The cause of TVI was endocarditis (n = 6) or trauma (n = 1); two patients suffered from hypertrophic non-obstructive cardiomyopathy, and one patient had endomyocardial fibrosis. TVI was related to constrictive pericarditis (n = 1) and to prior heart transplantation (n = 3). Seven patients were in NYHA functional classes I/II, and 13 were in classes III/IV. TVR was performed with either a mechanical valve (n = 15) or a bioprosthesis (n = 5). One patient (5%) died perioperatively, and five (25%) died during the follow up period. Two patients underwent a redo-operation during follow up, one due to prosthetic endocarditis, and one after thrombosis of a mechanical prosthesis. There was no structural deterioration of biological prostheses, and no bleeding due to anticoagulation with mechanical prostheses. Among the surviving patients, 13 were in NYHA class I, and one was in class II/III at the time of follow up. CONCLUSION: Isolated TVR for acquired TVI is rarely performed. Among the present patients, perioperative mortality and morbidity were lower than previously reported in the literature. The long-term outcome appeared to be largely dependent on the etiology of the regurgitation.

[The impact of diabetes mellitus on the results of coronary artery bypass grafting with respect to left ventricular function]. / Der Einfluss des Diabetes mellitus auf koronarchirurgische Eingriffe unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der linksventrikulären Funktion.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus is not only an independent risk factor for the development of arteriosclerosis, but also a risk factor for the surgical and interventional treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 2003, a consecutive series of 2,142 patients underwent isolated coronary bypass grafting at the authors' institution, 567 of these suffering from diabetes mellitus. RESULTS: An analysis of the diabetic and nondiabetic patients revealed a more pronounced risk profile, a significantly reduced left ventricular function and a significantly poorer quality of the coronary arteries in the diabetic group. Perioperative mortality in both groups was not different. The incidence of wound infections, renal failure and neurologic complications was much higher in diabetic patients. CONCLUSION: From these findings it can be concluded that coronary artery bypass grafting in the current era is not associated with a higher perioperative mortality in diabetic patients despite their risk profile at baseline. The risk of wound infections and perioperative renal and neurologic complications is much higher in diabetic patients.

Determinants of mid- and long-term results in patients after surgical revascularization for ischemic cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: The revascularization of patients suffering from ischemic cardiomyopathy is possible with acceptable perioperative mortality and morbidity. Many publications have discussed the problem of predicting myocardial viability, whereas the quality of the peripheral coronary vessels has been focused on less frequently. METHODS: We studied 908 consecutive patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy revascularized between January 1, 1988 and April 30, 2000. Death, recurrent heart failure, hospitalization due to cardiac causes, ventricular assist device implantation, heart transplantation, and ventricular arrhythmias were defined as adverse events. To analyze the importance of pre- and perioperative variables (state of the coronary arteries, myocardial viability, complete vs incomplete revascularization, urgency of the operation, previous operations, gender, diabetes, preoperative New York Heart Association class, age, number of grafts, and ischemic time), a proportional hazards model was used. RESULTS: The most important predictors of short- and long-term event-free survival were the quality of the coronary arteries, followed by myocardial viability, complete revascularization, number of bypass grafts, and an elective operation. CONCLUSIONS: The coronary vascular system can be described by means of a simple scoring system. A good or at least moderate coronary artery perfusing an area of dysfunctional yet viable myocardium is the main predictor of a successful perioperative course and an event-free survival. Patients with a poor coronary vasculature regardless of myocardial viability should not be considered suitable for revascularization.