ABSTRACT
In the aging of Western populations, decreased mortality is counterbalanced by an increase in morbidity, particularly involving chronic diseases such as most renal diseases. The price of the successful care of chronic conditions, such as cardiovascular diseases or diabetes, is a continuous increase in new dialysis patients. However, the increased survival of patients on chronic renal replacement therapies poses new challenges to nephrologists and calls for new models of care. Since its split from internal medicine, nephrology has seen a progressive trend toward super specialization and the differentiation into at least 3 major branches (nephrology, dialysis, and transplantation), following a path common to several other fields of internal medicine. The success in the care of chronic patients is owed not only to a careful technical prescription, but also to the ability to teach self-care and attain compliance; this requires good medical practice and a sound patient-physician relationship. In this context, the usual models of care may fail to provide adequate coordination and, despite valuable single elements, could end up as an orchestra without a conductor. We propose an integrated model of care oriented to the type of patient (tested in our area especially for diabetic patients): the patient is followed-up by the same team from the first signs of renal disease to eventual dialysis or transplantation. This model offers an interesting alternative both for patients, who usually seek continuity of care, and for nephrologists who prefer a holistic and integrated patient-physician approach.
Subject(s)
Continuity of Patient Care/organization & administration , Kidney Diseases/therapy , Kidney Transplantation , Models, Organizational , Physician-Patient Relations , Progressive Patient Care/organization & administration , Renal Dialysis , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Chronic Disease , Disease Progression , Female , Hemodialysis Units, Hospital , Hemodialysis, Home , Holistic Health , Hospitals, University , Humans , Italy , Kidney Diseases/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Nephrology/education , Nephrology/organization & administration , Patient ComplianceABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Early referral is a major goal in chronic kidney diseases; however, loss to follow-up, potentially limiting its advantages, has never been studied. MATERIAL/METHODS: In order to assess the prevalence and causes of loss to follow-up, a telephone inquiry was performed in a renal outpatient unit, mainly dedicated to early referral of diabetic patients. Patients were considered to be in follow-up if there was at least one check-up in the period February 2001-February 2002, and lost to follow-up if the last check-up had occurred in the previous year. The reasons for loss to follow-up were related to typical clinical-biochemical parameters to define a "drop-out profile". RESULTS: 195 patients were on follow-up: median creatinine 1.4 mg/dL, age 64, 76.9% diabetics. 81 patients were lost to follow-up: creatinine 1.4 mg/dL, age 70, 73.8% diabetics. A telephone number was available in 87.6% of the cases; 25 were not found, 7 had died, 24 were non-compliant, 1 was bed-ridden, 12 had changed care unit, 2 had started dialysis. Renal care was shorter in those lost to follow-up; among the latter, serum creatinine and age were significantly lower in non-compliant patients. A logistic regression model confirmed the significance of lower serum creatinine at last check-up in non-compliant patients (p=0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Loss to follow-up is a problem in nephrology; lack of awareness probably causes the higher drop-out rate at lower creatinine levels. The initial period of care may be crucial for long-term compliance. Further studies are needed to tailor organizational and educational interventions.
