ABSTRACT
CONTEXT: Children are a uniquely vulnerable patient population with restricted abilities for self-advocacy and autonomy, risking infringement upon their dignity. Yet the concept of dignity in pediatrics remains underexplored relative to the adult literature and other outcome measures. OBJECTIVES: To characterize how dignity is defined, evaluated, and/or measured in pediatrics. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines across the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health, PsycINFO, Global Health, Social Science Premium Collection, and Dissertation and Theses. We included publications from database inception through April 2023, in English, involving children aged 0-18 years, and prioritizing dignity as a central theme with a focus on defining, evaluating, or measuring dignity. Study descriptions and pertinent characteristics were extracted and synthesized using a predefined form. RESULTS: Forty-four articles met inclusion criteria; fewer than half comprised original research (20/44, 45%). Most studies (38/44, 86%) included description of the meaning of dignity, with emergence of salient themes around respect, communication, agency/autonomy, and privacy. Less than half (19/44, 43%) included a measurement or evaluation of dignity; approximately one-third described dignity therapy. More than one-third of publications focused on dignity at end of life (17/44, 39%) and included discussions of palliative care and hospice (15/44, 34%). CONCLUSION: Relatively few published studies describe dignity in pediatrics. Opportunities exist to broaden scholarship on this topic in partnership with patients, families, and clinicians, with the goal of assessing and strengthening dignity-centered care across the illness course and at the end of life.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Conversations about dignity are fundamental to person-centered care in pediatrics, yet practical language strategies to promote and support dignity remain understudied. To address this gap, we aimed to identify and characterize language used by pediatric oncologists to recognize and affirm dignity across advancing illness. METHODS: In this longitudinal prospective study, we audio-recorded serial disease reevaluation encounters between pediatric oncologists, children with cancer, and families across 24 months or until the child's death. Using a hybrid deductive-inductive qualitative approach, we defined dignity language a priori on the basis of existing descriptions of dignity in the literature and then conducted a content analysis to refine the definition specific to pediatric cancer care before coding serial medical encounters. Thematic frequencies were reported by using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A total of 91 discussions at timepoints of disease progression were audio-recorded for 36 patients and their families. No dignity language was identified in nearly half (45%) of "bad news" encounters, and the time spent by the oncologist engaging in dignity language represented a minority (<7%) of overall recorded dialogue. Within coded dialogue, we characterized 3 key themes upholding dignity language (empowerment, autonomy, respect). CONCLUSIONS: Opportunities exist to improve dignity communication in childhood cancer, and the authors propose a conceptual model ("Lend an EAR") to guide dignity-based communication in pediatric cancer. Future research should emphasize patient and parent perspectives on language to support dignity for children with advanced cancer, with stakeholder-driven refinement of the Lend an EAR model before integration and testing in communication skills training programs.
ABSTRACT
Disparities continue to exist in the timely provision of postpartum contraception. This study aimed to identify prevalence and factors associated with postpartum contraception provision among women enrolled in Medicaid. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the 2014 National Medicaid data, linked to county-level social vulnerability index (SVI) data. Women aged 15-44 with a live birth in 2014 were included. Multivariable logistic regression was used to predict 3-day provision of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) and 60-day provision of most effective or moderately effective contraceptives (MMEC). Overall, 3-day LARC provision was 0.2% while 60-day MMEC was 36.3%. Significantly lower odds of receiving MMEC was found among women aged 15-20 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.87; 95% CI:0.86-0.89) compared to women 20-44 years as well as among Asian women (aOR = 0.69; 95% CI:0.66-0.72) and Hispanic women (aOR = 0.73; 95% CI:0.72-0.75) compared to White women. The provision of postpartum contraception remains low, generally, and needs attention in communities experiencing poor maternal outcomes.
