Semi-automatic quantification of subsolid pulmonary nodules: comparison with manual measurements.

RATIONALE: Accurate measurement of subsolid pulmonary nodules (SSN) is becoming increasingly important in the management of these nodules. SSNs were previously quantified with time-consuming manual measurements. The aim of the present study is to test the feasibility of semi-automatic SSNs measurements and to compare the results to the manual measurements. METHODS: In 33 lung cancer screening participants with 33 SSNs, the nodules were previously quantified by two observers manually. In the present study two observers quantified these nodules by using semi-automated nodule volumetry software. Nodules were quantified for effective diameter, volume and mass. The manual and semi-automatic measurements were compared using Bland-Altman plots and paired T tests. Observer agreement was calculated as an intraclass correlation coefficient. Data are presented as mean (SD). RESULTS: Semi-automated measurements were feasible in all 33 nodules. Nodule diameter, volume and mass were 11.2 (3.3) mm, 935 (691) ml and 379 (311) milligrams for observer 1 and 11.1 (3.7) mm, 986 (797) ml and 399 (344) milligrams for observer 2, respectively. Agreement between observers and within observer 1 for the semi-automatic measurements was good with an intraclass correlation coefficient >0.89. For observer 1 and observer 2, measured diameter was 8.8% and 10.3% larger (p<0.001), measured volume was 24.3% and 26.5% larger (p<0.001) and measured mass was 10.6% and 12.0% larger (p<0.001) with the semi-automatic program compared to the manual measurements. CONCLUSION: Semi-automated measurement of the diameter, volume and mass of SSNs is feasible with good observer agreement. Semi-automated measurement makes quantification of mass and volume feasible in daily practice.

Minimally invasive ablative therapies for invasive breast carcinomas: an overview of current literature.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive treatment may be an alternative to breast-conserving surgery. METHODS: A structured PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science search was performed. Endpoints studied were feasibility, completeness of ablation, timing of the sentinel node biopsy (SNB), imaging modalities, and treatment-related complications. RESULTS: A total of 24 articles were retrieved, and the level of evidence varied (2B-4). Mainly phase II studies with a treat-and-resect protocol were analyzed. Up to 100% completeness of ablation was reported for radiofrequency ablation (RFA), cryosurgery, and focused ultrasound (FUS). The oncologic results need further evaluation. Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI seems to be the best method for monitoring treatment response (77% sensitivity, 100% specificity). Ultrasound is suitable for guiding probes into the tumor. There is no consensus on the timing of the SNB. CONCLUSIONS: All studies on minimally invasive ablative modalities published so far show that these techniques are feasible and safe. At this stage only T1 tumors should be ablated in a clinical trial setting; it is unclear which of the modalities is most suitable.