Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 29
Filter
2.
Cureus ; 14(9): e29149, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36258975

ABSTRACT

Background Refractory status epilepticus (RSE) is a common neurologic emergency with refractory cases leading to increased rates of morbidity and mortality in patients. The lack of previous studies on the incidence, causes, and management of refractory status epilepticus in the pediatric population from our region prompted us to investigate further in this study. Methods We included retrospective data of all patients admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) with a provisional diagnosis of RSE at a tertiary care hospital in Karachi from February 2019 to February 2021. No personal identification data was used, and confidentiality of the data was maintained throughout the analysis. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 22.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics, Armonk, NY, USA) was used to pool data and perform a descriptive analysis. Results Among the 687 patients who presented to the PICU with seizures, 50 (7.27%) patients were eventually diagnosed with RSE during the two-year period. The majority of the patients were male and less than one year of age. Infectious causes predominated our data cohort, and a four-drug regimen consisting of phenytoin, levetiracetam, valproic acid, and midazolam was able to terminate RSE in the majority of the patients in our setting (70%). The mortality rate was noted to be 22% among patients with RSE. Conclusion Morbidity and mortality among pediatric RSE patients are high in our settings. Urgent emergency services and timely cause-directed intervention could improve outcomes.

3.
Ann Med Surg (Lond) ; 83: 104766, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36281276

ABSTRACT

Background: The COVID-19 took over the world in 2020 and a lockdown has been imposed seeing its fast spread. Frontline health care workers (HCWs) were reported frequently with a lack of motivation, hesitancy and unwillingness to perform their duties during this pandemic. This cross-sectional survey aims to evaluate the factors associated with lack of motivation and increased hesitancy among the frontline HCWs to perform their duties during COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and methods: A total of 239 HCWs were included in this web-based cross-sectional study, who have worked during the COVID-19 pandemic. The anonymous online questionnaire was sent to all faculty, trainees and staff of Aga Khan University Hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. The survey was conducted from September 2020 to January 2021 during the COVID-19 pandemic. All data was exported into Statistical Package for Social Sciences Version 19 for multivariate analysis. Results: The risk of getting infected was strongly reported by 180 participants, and it was associated with higher hesitation to work (aOR = 6.09 [2.55-14.59]). Fifty-one participants felt that lack of knowledge about prevention and protection was associated with lower motivation to work (aOR = 0.66 [0.35-1.25]). Participants reported higher hesitation due to the burden of changed quality of work, physical exhaustion, mental exhaustion and altered sleep patterns. Sense of feeling protected by their hospitals was a motivating factor, and participants receiving adequate support reported higher motivation to work (aOR = 2.60 [1.32-5.14]). Conclusion: Fear of infection, increased working hours, and inadequate support of the workplace played a key role in escalating the hesitancy among HCWs to perform their duties. Lack of disease knowledge and paucity of personal protective equipment further lowered the motivation levels of HCWs to work effectively during the COVID-19 pandemic.

4.
Ann Med Surg (Lond) ; 81: 104499, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36147080

ABSTRACT

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has authorized Ruxolitinib (Opzelura), as first at-home treatment for non-segmental vitiligo, an autoimmune condition that causes spots and patches of paler skin. Previously, it was used to treat atopic dermatitis, myelofibrosis, essential thrombocythemia, and polycythemia vera. It functions by lowering an individual's enhanced immune response, gradually promoting the development of new, healthy skin cells, and ultimately reintroducing pigment to the afflicted area. Using this topical lotion twice daily can not only produce even skin tones but also boost patients' self-esteem because vitiligo can be physically and psychologically upsetting. It is comparatively more efficacious and has a better safety profile than the oral forms of this medicine, although adverse effects such acne, redness, and itching at the application site, inflammation of the throat and nasal passages, headaches and fever have been observed, necessitating the need for observational studies and randomized controlled trials to demonstrate its efficacy and safety.

5.
Health Sci Rep ; 5(4): e713, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35774831

ABSTRACT

Background: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is one of the most prevalent hemoglobinopathies that affects around 275,000 neonates annually. Until 2017, hydroxyurea was the only available drug for SCD treatment. Later on, L-glutamine and crizanlizumab have shown promising results in SCD therapy. Objectives: There were limited pharmacological options for the disease when in November, 2019, voxelotor was approved for the treatment of SCD patients after showing promising results in the clinical HOPE trial. Despite its favorable results, some life-threatening side effects were also observed. Uncertainty regarding the use of available pharmaceutical therapies for SCD is the major hurdle for the survival of patients. Discussion & Conclusion: An immediate attention needs to be drawn towards the drawbacks of limited pharmacological options for SCD. Article calls out to conduct more extensive trials in this advanced era of medicine where ambiguity regarding the use of SCD drugs still prevails.

6.
Cureus ; 13(10): e19106, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34868757

ABSTRACT

Background Vaccine hesitancy has been a huge challenge in controlling preventable diseases. With the emergence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines, it is vital to know their acceptance rates among the masses. No comparative data is available on the current subject from Pakistan yet. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the acceptance of a potential COVID-19 vaccine among the general population and healthcare workers (HCWs) of Pakistan, along with their perceptions and barriers to acceptance. Methods An online cross-sectional study was carried out in Pakistan from December 19, 2020, to January 10, 2021, using convenience sampling. A self-administered questionnaire consisting of 31 items was distributed after informed consent. Inclusion criteria consisted of HCWs and non-HCWs (general population) aged 18 years and above, residing in Pakistan. All analyses were done using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Chi-square and T-test were used and a p-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant for all cases. Results Of the 404 respondents (n=196 general population and n=208 HCWs), 73.5% were willing to get a proven, safe, and effective COVID-19 vaccine if it was free of cost. This was reduced to only 64.3% if the vaccine was not free and had to be paid for. A total of 168 (41.6%) participants agreed to get vaccinated immediately, while 149 (36.9%) participants concurred to get it on a delayed basis. Eighty-seven (21.5%) participants refused to receive the COVID-19 vaccine, amongst which a significant majority (p<0.001) of the participants were from the general population. Doctors or scientists/scholarly journals were found to be the most trusted source of information (67.6%; n=273), while fear of unknown side effects (45.5%; n=184) was found to be the most common barrier towards COVID-19 vaccination. More than half (53.5%) participants believed that the vaccine is safe, effective, and has minimal side effects, amongst which a significantly large fraction (p<0.001) belonged to the HCWs. Conclusion The acceptance rate of a safe, effective, proven, and free COVID-19 vaccine was 73.5%. The fear of unknown side effects was the most common barrier to COVID-19 vaccine uptake. The general population demonstrated less knowledge, more false perceptions, and barriers to COVID-19 vaccine. Adequate measures should be taken to educate the masses about the COVID-19 vaccine, and its safety, and further studies are required.

7.
Pan Afr Med J ; 39: 173, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34584599

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19), first appearing in Wuhan, China, and later declared as a pandemic, has caused serious morbidity and mortality worldwide. Severe cases usually present with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), pneumonia, acute kidney injury (AKI), liver damage, or septic shock. However, with recent advances in severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) research, the virus´s effect on cardiac tissues has become evident. Reportedly, an increased number of COVID-19 patients manifested serious cardiac complications such as heart failure, increased troponin, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels (NT-proBNP), cardiomyopathies, and myocarditis. These cardiac complications initially present as chest tightness, chest pain, and heart palpitations. Diagnostic investigations such as telemetry, electrocardiogram (ECG), cardiac biomarkers (troponin, NT-proBNP), and inflammatory markers (D-dimer, fibrinogen, PT, PTT), must be performed according to the patient´s condition. The best available options for treatment are the provision of supportive care, anti-viral therapy, hemodynamic monitoring, IL-6 blockers, statins, thrombolytic, and anti-hypertensive drugs. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) healthcare workers should be well-informed about the evolving research regarding COVID-19 and approach as a multi-disciplinary team to devise effective strategies for challenging situations to reduce cardiac complications.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , Heart Diseases/virology , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Biomarkers/metabolism , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19 Testing , Heart Diseases/diagnosis , Heart Diseases/physiopathology , Humans , Patient Care Team/organization & administration
8.
Cureus ; 13(7): e16407, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34414043

ABSTRACT

Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) is an uncommon vascular disorder in which venous thrombosis prevents the venous outflow of the liver. The obstruction is primarily at the level of hepatic veins and inferior vena cava. Here, we present a case of a two-and-a-half-year-old male child who presented with complaints of abdominal distension for two months and fever and watery diarrhea for one month. Physical examination showed the patient was anemic with palmar erythema. He was started on an empirical treatment of cefotaxime, metronidazole, and amikacin. Sensitivity and culture reports for blood and urine samples were negative, but abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan showed characteristic findings for BCS with caudate lobe hypertrophy. After the symptomatic treatment of the patient, a liver transplant was suggested as a last resort.

10.
CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets ; 20(5): 465-472, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33292126

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Restless leg syndrome (RLS) has been recognized as a typical additional manifestation among patients with cirrhosis of the liver. RLS prevalence in liver cirrhosis further worsens the quality of life, which has already been compromised with the disease-related complications of cirrhosis itself. AIMS: The study aimed to determine the frequency and severity of Restless Leg Syndrome (RLS) among patients with cirrhosis of the liver and to correlate its severity with the severity of cirrhosis. METHODS: This prospective cross-sectional study was carried out at Ruth K.M. Pfau Civil Hospital (Karachi, Pakistan) from December 2019 to February 2020. Three hundred and fifteen cirrhotic patients with any etiology were included in the study after informed written consent. Restless leg syndrome with its severity was determined in all cirrhotic patients. For continuous variables, means and medians with standard deviations were calculated, while percentages and proportions were used for discrete variables. Spearman correlation was used to find significance between RLS Severity Score (RSS) and Model of End-stage Liver Disease MELD Score. A p value of < 0.05 was considered significant for all analyses. RESULTS: The frequency of RLS among cirrhotic patients was 38.4%. More than half (54.5%) of the patients had severe RLS. Viral related hepatitis C and hepatitis B were the most common cause of cirrhosis of the liver (57.8% and 30.8%). A significant difference was found between as patients both with or without RLS in terms of age (p=0.003), gender (p=0.005), hemoglobin (p=0.00), and serum albumin (p=0.01). No significant association was found between RLS severity score and MELD Score (p=0.693). CONCLUSION: Prevalence of RLS is very high among cirrhotic patients, but no correlation was found between the severity of RLS and cirrhosis. Further studies should be carried out to assess the quality of life in cirrhotic patients having RLS.


Subject(s)
Liver Cirrhosis/epidemiology , Restless Legs Syndrome/epidemiology , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Male , Middle Aged , Pakistan/epidemiology , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Restless Legs Syndrome/complications , Severity of Illness Index , Surveys and Questionnaires
11.
Cureus ; 12(10): e10869, 2020 Oct 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33178522

ABSTRACT

Background and objectives A flare-up in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases threatens the health of people, and though there is no proven pharmacological treatment, many analytical studies have suggested that interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels are elevated in cases of severe COVID-19 and that the anti-IL-6 biologic agent tocilizumab may be beneficial. This is a critical review of studies aiming to assess the safety and efficacy of tocilizumab as compared to the standard regimen in patients with COVID-19. Materials and methods Online databases (PubMed and Cochrane) were searched until June 29, 2020, for original articles investigating the immunological response in COVID-19 and its treatment with tocilizumab. Data on multiple baseline characteristics and pre-specified endpoints were extracted and pooled using a random effect model. We used Review Manager version 5.3 (The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014, Denmark) and Stata 11.0 (Stata Corporation LP, College Station, TX) for all analyses. Risk ratios (RR) and the weighted mean difference (WMD) with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Results From a total of 1,246 identified articles, 13 studies were included after duplicate removal and narrowing based on title and abstract. Of the 13 included studies, seven case-control studies were shortlisted for meta-analysis (quantitative) and six-single arm studies were used in the discussion (qualitative). These studies had 766 patients (351 in the tocilizumab arm and 414 in the control arm). Their pooled analysis demonstrated that mortality was significantly lower in the tocilizumab group (RR=0.56 [0.34, 0.92]; p=0.02; I2=76%), as was the need for artificial invasive ventilation (RR=0.34 [0.12, 0.99]; p=0.05; I2=0%) as compared to the control group. No significant differences were observed between tocilizumab and control group in intensive care unit admissions (RR=0.73 [0.15, 3.59]; p=0.70; I2=60%) and risks of post-drug infection (RR=1.29 [0.41, 4.04]; p=0.66; I2=88%). In terms of efficacy outcome, improved oxygen saturation (RR=1.13 [1.04, 1.65]; p=0.02; I2=0%) was reported to be markedly significant in tocilizumab patients when compared with the standard care group. Conclusions Our results based on pooled studies show tocilizumab to be safe and efficacious in reducing mortality among critically ill COVID-19 patients. However, due to the limited number of observational studies, the positive findings should be viewed cautiously and warrant further investigation.

12.
Cureus ; 12(8): e10146, 2020 Aug 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33014644

ABSTRACT

Leiomyosarcoma, primarily a tumor of smooth muscle origin, frequently originates from the uterus, retroperitoneum, and intra-abdominal region. Rarely, the tumor may arise from the conjunctiva, inferior vena cava, or oral cavity. Here we report a case of a 65-year-old male patient who presented with a swelling in the posterior thigh for six months. The swelling was progressively increasing in size for the last two months. Examination of thigh showed a swelling of 20×30 cm in size, which was firm, non-compressible, immobile, and not transilluminating. CT scan showed no metastasis in the liver, lung, or bone. The histopathology report showed poorly differentiated leiomyosarcoma involving the muscles of the posterior compartment of the left thigh. The tumor was resected, and the patient was referred to rehabilitation clinic. Early diagnosis of such cases is essential to improve the outcome in patients as these tumors can metastasize early.

14.
Cureus ; 12(7): e9424, 2020 Jul 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32864250

ABSTRACT

Background and Aims The prevalence and extent of liver damage in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients remain poorly understood, primarily due to small-sized epidemiological studies with varying definitions of "liver injury". We conducted a meta-analysis to derive generalizable, well-powered estimates of liver injury prevalence in COVID-19 patients. We also aimed to assess whether liver injury prevalence is significantly greater than the baseline prevalence of chronic liver disease (CLD). Our secondary aim was to study whether the degree of liver injury was associated with the severity of COVID-19. Materials and Methods Electronic databases (PubMed and Scopus) were systematically searched in June 2020 for studies reporting the prevalence of baseline CLD and current liver injury in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Liver injury was defined as an elevation in transaminases >3 times above the upper limit of normal. For the secondary analysis, all studies reporting mean liver enzyme levels in severe versus non-severe COVID-19 patients were included. A random-effects model was used for meta-analysis. Proportions were subjected to arcsine transformation and pooled to derive pooled proportions and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup differences were tested for using the chi-square test and associated p-value. Means and their standard errors were pooled to derive weighted mean differences (WMDs) and corresponding 95% CIs. Results Electronic search yielded a total of 521 articles. After removal of duplicates and reviewing the full-texts of potential studies, a total of 27 studies met the inclusion criteria. Among a cohort of 8,817 patients, the prevalence of current liver injury was 15.7% (9.5%-23.0%), and this was significantly higher than the proportion of patients with a history of CLD (4.9% [2.2%-8.6%]; p < 0.001). A total of 2,900 patients in our population had severe COVID-19, and 7,184 patients had non-severe COVID-19. Serum ALT (WMD: 7.19 [4.90, 9.48]; p < 0.001; I2 = 69%), AST (WMD: 9.02 [6.89, 11.15]; p < 0.001; I2 = 73%) and bilirubin levels (WMD: 1.78 [0.86, 2.70]; p < 0.001; I2 = 82%) were significantly higher in patients with severe COVID-19 when compared to patients with non-severe disease. Albumin levels were significantly lower in patients with severe COVID-19 (WMD: -4.16 [-5.97, -2.35]; p < 0.001; I2 = 95%). Conclusions Patients with COVID-19 have a higher than expected prevalence of liver injury, and the extent of the injury is associated with the severity of the disease. Further studies are required to assess whether hepatic damage is caused by the virus, medications, or both.

15.
Cureus ; 12(9): e10491, 2020 Sep 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32953367

ABSTRACT

Background and objectives In high-risk populations, the efficacy of mesh placement in incisional hernia (IH) prevention after elective abdominal surgeries has been supported by many published studies. This meta-analysis aimed at providing comprehensive and updated clinical implications of prophylactic mesh placement (PMP) for the prevention of IH as compared to primary suture closure (PSC). Materials and methods PubMed, Science Direct, Cochrane, and Google Scholar were systematically searched until March 3, 2020, for studies comparing the efficacy of PMP to PSC in abdominal surgeries. The main outcome of interest was the incidence of IH at different follow-up durations. All statistical analyses were carried out using Review Manager version 5.3 (The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014) and Stata 11.0 (Stata Corporation LP, College Station, TX). The data were pooled using the random-effects model, and odds ratio (OR) and weighted mean differences (WMD) were calculated with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Results A total of 3,330 were identified initially and after duplicate removal and exclusion based on title and abstract, 26 studies comprising 3,000 patients, were included. The incidence of IH was significantly reduced for PMP at follow-up periods of one year (OR= 0.16 [0.05, 0.51]; p=0.002; I2=77%), two years (OR= 0.23 [0.12, 0.45]; p<0.0001; I2=68%), three years (OR= 0.30 [0.16, 0.59]; p=0.0004; I2= 52%), and five years (OR=0.15 [0.03, 0.85]; p=0.03; I2=87%). However, PMP was associated with an increased risk of seroma (OR=1.67 [1.10, 2.55]; p= 0.02; I2=19%) and chronic wound pain (OR=1.71 [1.03, 2.83]; p= 0.04; I2= 0%). No significant difference between the PMP and PSC groups was noted for postoperative hematoma (OR= 1.04 [0.43, 2.50]; p=0.92; I2=0%), surgical site infection (OR=1.09 [0.78, 1.52]; p= 0.62; I2=12%), wound dehiscence (OR=0.69 [0.30, 1.62]; p=0.40; I2= 0%), gastrointestinal complications (OR= 1.40 [0.76, 2.58]; p=0.28; I2= 0%), length of hospital stay (WMD= -0.49 [-1.45, 0.48]; p=0.32; I2=0%), and operating time (WMD=9.18 [-7.17, 25.54]; p= 0.27; I2=80%). Conclusions PMP has been effective in reducing the rate of IH in the high-risk population at all time intervals, but it is associated with an increased risk of seroma and chronic wound pain. The benefits of mesh largely outweigh the risk, and it is linked with positive outcomes in high-risk patients.

16.
Cureus ; 12(6): e8550, 2020 Jun 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32670687

ABSTRACT

Background The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has put an excessive strain on healthcare systems across the globe, causing a shortage of personal protective equipment (PPE). PPE is a precious commodity for health personnel to protect them against infections. We investigated the availability of PPE among doctors in the United States (US) and Pakistan. Methods A cross-sectional study, including doctors from the US and Pakistan, was carried out from April 8 to May 5, 2020. An online self-administered questionnaire was distributed to doctors working in hospitals in the US and Pakistan after a small pilot study. All analysis was done using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 23.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Results After informed consent, 574 doctors (60.6% from Pakistan and 39.4% from the US) were included in the analysis. The majority of the participants were females (53.3%), and the mean age of the participants was 35.3 ± 10.3 years. Most doctors (47.7%) were from medicine and allied fields. Among the participants, 87.6% of doctors from the US reported having access to masks/N95 respirators, 79.6% to gloves, 77.9% to face-shields or goggles, and 50.4% to full-suit/gown. Whereas, doctors in Pakistan reported to have poor availability of PPE with only 37.4% having access to masks/N95 respirator, 34.5% to gloves, 13.8% to face-shields or goggles, and 12.9% to full-suit/gown. The reuse of PPE was reported by 80.5% and 60.3% physicians from the US and Pakistan, respectively. More doctors from Pakistan (50.6%) reported that they had been forced to work without PPE compared to doctors in the US (7.1%). Conclusion There is a lack of different forms of PPE in the US and Pakistan. Doctors from both countries reported that they had been forced to work without PPE. Compared to the US, more doctors from Pakistan reported having faced discrimination in receiving PPE.

17.
Cureus ; 12(6): e8679, 2020 Jun 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32699679

ABSTRACT

Background Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has spread to almost every country on the globe, and each country is reporting the symptomatic presentation of their patients to give better insight into the various clinical presentations of SARS-CoV-2. However, the epidemiological literature from Pakistan is scanty. Methods We retrospectively analyzed data from 412 patients who were residents of East Karachi and tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 between February 26 to April 24, 2020. Patients' demographics, symptoms, travel and contact history, and outcomes were recorded. All statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22 (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, IBM Corp, Armonk, NY). Results Most of the patients were male (64.6%), the majority (43.3%) belonging to the 21- to 40-year age group. Most of the patients (65.5%) were residents of Gulshan Iqbal. A total of 15.8% of the patients were admitted to the hospital, and 3.9% of patients expired. The three most common presenting symptoms were fever (74.8%), cough (60.4%), and flu (35.5%). The majority of patients (89.3%) gave a history of contact with SARS-CoV-2 patients. Conclusion The number of SARS-CoV-2 cases is rapidly increasing in Karachi, Pakistan. There is a need to educate the population about the most common sign and symptoms of the virus so that individuals can identify these symptoms and get themselves tested. The concerned authorities should devise an adequate and effective plan to flatten the infectivity curve.

18.
Cureus ; 12(4): e7844, 2020 Apr 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32483495

ABSTRACT

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is one of the most common motor neuron diseases (MND), which presents as muscle weakness, atrophy, spasticity, and, in extreme cases, may result in death due to respiratory failure. ALS has been reported with dermatological conditions such as bullous pemphigoid and decreased collagen. Hyperpigmentation usually occurs due to underlying adrenal or metabolic disorder, but no case of hyperpigmentation has been associated with MND. We report a case of a 25-year-old man who presented with signs of young-onset ALS (progressive weakness of both upper limbs) with hyperpigmentation of limbs. The patient did not have any other underlying etiology, which could have led to the development of hyperpigmentation Biopsy was negative for polymyositis and dermatomyositis. The patient was counseled about the nature of the disease and was advised regular follow-ups.

19.
Cureus ; 12(5): e8021, 2020 May 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32528760

ABSTRACT

Since its origin in China, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has become a pandemic and spread to 209 countries. As coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a very rapidly emerging disease, organ-specific studies related to it have been reported. Apart from respiratory findings, some studies have highlighted inflammatory consequences in the heart, kidney, and/or liver as well. Cardiac involvement in COVID-19 seems to be a result of an inflammatory storm in response to the infection. Moreover, direct viral invasion of cardiomyocytes, as well as a myocardial injury due to oxidative stress, may account for acute cardiac injury in COVID-19. Nevertheless, the mechanism of heart injury in COVID-19 is not clear yet. However, multiple studies that highlight the clinical features, laboratory findings, and prognosis of acute myocardial injury (AMI) in COVID-19-affected individuals have been published. In this review, we have summarized the findings of all those studies as well as the clinical features and management of cardiac injury discussed by some case reports.

20.
Cureus ; 12(3): e7489, 2020 Mar 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32368422

ABSTRACT

Background With the advancements in medicine and increasing access to modern technology, pediatric intensive care units (PICU) are becoming a vital part of any health care setting. PICUs play a key role in saving the life of young patients. Various scales have been designed by researchers to aid in predicting the mortality of a patient admitted in PICU. Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM) and Pediatric Index of Mortality (PIM) are among the most commonly used scales. Calculating the risk of mortality enables the physicians to classify the patients and helps in identifying which patients require more urgent care and resources.  Methods A hospital-based prospective study was carried out at PICU in a tertiary care hospital in Karachi from December 2017 to June 2019. All patients between the age of one month and 12 years were included in our study after informed consent from parents/guardians. A standard questionnaire was used and the PRISM III score was calculated at 24 hours of admission. All necessary investigations were carried out, and all statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS v.23 (IBM, Armonk, NY). Results A total of 407 patients were included in our study with the majority being males (54.5%). The mean age was 27±33 months. The mean duration of stay of patients in PICU was 80.15±36.58 hours. The mortality rate in our study was 37.35 % (n=152). The need for mechanical ventilation, use of inotropic drugs, higher temperatures, and low Glasgow Coma Scale scores were associated with poor survival. It was noted that as the PRISM III score increased, the mortality rate also increased. In our study, we found that PRISM III had good predictive power in our population. The area under the curve was 0.903±0.016 (p<0.001, 95% confidence interval: 0.872-0.934). Conclusions PRISM III score showed excellent accuracy and predictive ability in our population. There was no significant difference in observed and expected mortality rates in our study. In a resource-limited setting, the prediction models highlight the cases where more medical attention is required and also enable the physicians to assess the prognosis of the patient so adequate measures can be taken beforehand.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...