ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To quantify the frequency and patterns of clinicians' use of choice frames when discussing preference-sensitive care with surrogate decision-makers in the ICU. DESIGN: Secondary sequential content analysis. SETTING: One hundred one audio-recorded and transcribed conferences between surrogates and clinicians of incapacitated, critically ill adults from a prospective, multicenter cohort study. SUBJECTS: Surrogate decision-makers and clinicians. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Four coders identified preference-sensitive decision episodes addressed in the meetings, including topics such as mechanical ventilation, renal replacement, and overall goals of care. Prior critical care literature provided specific topics identified as preference-sensitive specific to the critical care context. Coders then examined each decision episode for the types of choice frames used by clinicians. The choice frames were selected a priori based on decision science literature. In total, there were 202 decision episodes across the 101 transcripts, with 20.3% of the decision episodes discussing mechanical ventilation, 19.3% overall goals of care, 14.4% renal replacement therapy, 14.4% post-discharge care (i.e., discharge location such as a skilled nursing facility), and the remaining 32.1% other topics. Clinicians used default framing, in which an option is presented that will be carried out if another option is not actively chosen, more frequently than any other choice frame (127 or 62.9% of decision episodes). Clinicians presented a polar interrogative, or a "yes or no question" to accept or reject a specific care choice, in 43 (21.3%) decision episodes. Clinicians more frequently presented options emphasizing both potential losses and gains rather than either in isolation. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians frequently use default framing and polar questions when discussing preference-sensitive choices with surrogate decision-makers, which are known to be powerful nudges. Future work should focus on designing interventions promoting the informed use of these and the other most common choice frames used by practicing clinicians.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To examine the distribution of quantitative autistic traits (QATs) in an independent neurofibromatosis type I (NF1) sample, the relationships between QAT, sex, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptomatology, and to explore evidence for QAT mutational specificity within families. STUDY DESIGN: Age-appropriate versions of the Social Responsiveness Scale, second edition and the Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scales were completed for 103 patients with NF1 from the Washington University Neurofibromatosis Center. RESULTS: Patients with NF1 exhibited a pathologically shifted unimodal distribution for QAT. Forty-four percent of the subjects exhibited a QAT burden at or above 1 SD from the population mean; 13% scored at or above the extreme first percentile of the general population distribution. Elevations in ADHD symptomatology exhibited a distinct bimodal distribution; however, mean ADHD index scores were equivalent in patients who had been diagnosed in the community with ADHD compared with those who had not. We observed striking within-family associations for QAT, reflected by an Social Responsiveness Scale, second edition intraclass correlation of 0.77 in pairings of first degree relatives with NF1. CONCLUSIONS: Impairments in reciprocal social behavior and attention affect a large proportion of patients with NF1 throughout life and are often clinically unrecognized. Further exploration of genotype-phenotype correlation is strongly warranted for the purpose of gaining insights into mechanisms by which specific mutational variations in the NF1 gene may influence autistic trait severity.
