Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 32(14): 2354-2360, 2019 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29400114

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to evaluate pregnancy outcomes in patients with a history of wedge resection for interstitial ectopic pregnancy (WRIEP). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of pregnancies with a history of WRIEP from 2000 to 2013 at two inner city hospitals in Detroit, MI. Pregnant-matched controls (1:3) were selected and included patients with history of surgically treated tubal ectopic pregnancy and delivered patients without history of ectopic pregnancy. Pregnancy outcomes, including a composite, were compared among the groups. RESULTS: Eighty-three cases of interstitial pregnancy were identified. Sixty-three (75.9%) underwent WRIEP from which 19 (30.2%) had a subsequent pregnancy and 11 (57.9%) carried it ≥20 weeks. No difference in subsequent pregnancy outcomes including the composite was found among patients with prior WRIEP and patients with history of surgically treated tubal ectopic pregnancy except for a longer interpregnancy interval. Compared with delivered patients without a history of ectopic pregnancy, no difference in late obstetric outcomes was found including the composite, gestational age at delivery in weeks (38.2 versus 38.1, p = .955), preterm delivery rate (30% versus 21%, p = .674), and proportion of term vaginal (40% versus 52%, p = .721) or cesarean deliveries (60% versus 30%, p = .137). The most common indication for cesarean among patients with a history of WRIEP was a history of such (5/6, 83.3%) and there were no cases of abnormal placentation. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that a history of WRIEP is not associated with increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes.


Subject(s)
Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Pregnancy, Interstitial/surgery , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
2.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 295(2): 375-381, 2017 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27844211

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Evaluate whether morbid obesity influenced resolution, number of doses or ultimately surgical management of tubal ectopic pregnancy (TEP) when treated with single-dose regimen methotrexate (SDR-MTX) capped at 100 mg. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of patients with a diagnosis of TEP who underwent MTX treatment from 2000 to 2013. Patients were excluded if initial ß-hCG <1000 mIU/mL, did not have ß-hCG follow-up or were not treated with SDR-MTX. Per protocol, dose was administered at 50 mg/m2 with a capped maximum of 100 mg. Patients were divided based on their BMI (<40 and ≥40 kg/m2). Demographic variables, ß-hCG before treatment, maximum diameter of ectopic size, embryonic heart tones, decrease of ß-hCG, need for additional MTX doses and surgery despite treatment were recorded and compared among the groups. RESULTS: 151 women were included in the study, 89.4% (135/151) non-morbidly obese and 10.6% (16/151) morbidly obese. No differences in age distribution, ethnicity, pre-treatment presence of embryonic heart tones, maximum diameter of ectopic size ≥35 mm and ß-hCG ≥5000 mIU/ml were found. Following treatment, the proportion of patients with at least an 80% decrease in their ß-hCG levels or need for surgery were similar, however, morbidly obese patients were significantly more likely [11/134 vs. 5/16, OR 5.1 (1.5-17.3, p = 0.015)] to require an additional MTX dose. CONCLUSION: Among patients with TEP, morbidly obese patients were five times more likely to require an additional dose compared to non-morbidly obese when SDR-MTX capped at 100 mg was used for medical management.


Subject(s)
Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal/therapeutic use , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Obesity, Morbid/complications , Pregnancy, Ectopic/drug therapy , Adult , Chorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, Human/blood , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy, Ectopic/blood , Retrospective Studies
3.
J Reprod Med ; 61(3-4): 153-8, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27172638

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Vaginal delivery as we know it today has evolved, with increasing recognition of trauma to the pelvic floor and perineum. Evolutionary adaptation of the human female pelvis to vaginal deliveries brings with it many benefits, but risks still exist. These benefits and risks should be discussed with patients prior to delivery. Currently, no consensus exists on a standard informed consent process prior to normal vaginal delivery. OBJECTIVES: To synopsize the current literature regarding the ethics of informed consent in the setting of obstetric and gynecological practice, and to make the case for informed consent for vaginal delivery prior to labor. DISCUSSION: Vaginal birth is still viewed as the default method of delivery. The reason for this is not unrelated to the direct connection between the uterus that holds the fetus before labor, and the vagina, for which the term birth canal was given even before modern obstetrics. Although there are known benefits for advocating vaginal births, there are also attendant risks. CONCLUSION: It is incumbent on obstetricians and midwives to discuss those risk and benefits with their patient prior to labor. Verbal discussion without documentation may no longer be appropriate due to medical advancements and the litigious health care climate. For this reason, we argue for and advocate that a consent process be included as an educational measure and as part of our ethical obligation to provide care.


Subject(s)
Delivery, Obstetric , Informed Consent , Cesarean Section/statistics & numerical data , Delivery, Obstetric/adverse effects , Delivery, Obstetric/ethics , Delivery, Obstetric/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , Humans , Informed Consent/ethics , Informed Consent/legislation & jurisprudence , Labor, Obstetric , Obstetrics/ethics , Obstetrics/methods , Pelvic Floor Disorders/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Trial of Labor
4.
Fetal Pediatr Pathol ; 34(2): 103-7, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25353701

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Decidual cast describes the spontaneous sloughing of endometrium as an entire piece while retaining the shape of the endometrial cavity. It may be associated with increased serum progesterone levels and must be considered as a differential diagnosis in a patient who passes tissue per vagina while on progesterone containing hormonal contraception. CASE: A 13-year-old adolescent with a history of menorrhagia since menarche, presented to the pediatric emergency room with worsening abdominal pain and heavy vaginal bleeding stopping her oral contraceptive pill 10 days prior to presentation. Her symptoms resolved spontaneously following passage of tissue per vagina which was later by histopathology to be a decidual cast. CONCLUSION: Decidual cast is a rare pathological entity that may be a side effect of progesterone-containing hormonal contraceptives, requiring patient education before use.


Subject(s)
Contraception , Contraceptives, Oral, Combined/therapeutic use , Menorrhagia/drug therapy , Progesterone/therapeutic use , Uterus/pathology , Adolescent , Contraception/methods , Contraceptives, Oral, Combined/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Menorrhagia/pathology , Treatment Outcome , Uterus/drug effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...