Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Br J Haematol ; 188(4): 550-559, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31713861

ABSTRACT

T-cell depletion with alemtuzumab represents an effective form of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT); however, little is known regarding the impact of in vivo alemtuzumab on either the incidence or clinical characteristics of acute and chronic GVHD. We therefore studied 201 consecutive adult patients who received an alemtuzumab-based, reduced-intensity conditioned (RIC) allograft. With a median follow-up of 24 months, the cumulative incidence of classic acute and late acute (persistent, recurrent and late onset) GVHD grades II-IV (grades III-IV) was 34% (13%) and 20% (8%) respectively; the cumulative incidence of classic chronic GVHD and overlap syndrome were 4% and 7% respectively. A previous diagnosis of classic acute GVHD is a risk factor for chronic GVHD (hazard ratio 10·91, 95% confidence interval 2·35-50·63, P = 0·0023) while late onset acute GVHD is not a risk factor for later development of chronic GVHD. Unrelated donor transplant is a risk factor for the development of classic acute GVHD but not for late onset or chronic GVHD. In conclusion, this study describes a distinctive pattern of GVHD following alemtuzumab-RIC allografts, identifies the risk factors for GVHD development and provides prognostic information of patients with GVHD.


Subject(s)
Alemtuzumab/administration & dosage , Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Transplantation Conditioning , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Allografts , Chronic Disease , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Graft vs Host Disease/mortality , Graft vs Host Disease/therapy , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Organ Specificity , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Rate , Unrelated Donors
2.
J Clin Apher ; 33(1): 46-59, 2018 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28631842

ABSTRACT

Plerixafor is a CXC chemokine receptor (CXCR4) antagonist that mobilizes stem cells in the peripheral blood. It is indicated (in combination with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor [G-CSF]) to enhance the harvest of adequate quantities of cluster differentiation (CD) 34+ cells for autologous transplantation in patients with lymphoma or multiple myeloma whose cells mobilize poorly. Strategies for use include delayed re-mobilization after a failed mobilization attempt with G-CSF, and rescue or pre-emptive mobilization in patients in whom mobilization with G-CSF is likely to fail. Pre-emptive use has the advantage that it avoids the need to re-schedule the transplant procedure, with its attendant inconvenience, quality-of-life issues for the patient and cost of additional admissions to the transplant unit. UK experience from 2 major centers suggests that pre-emptive plerixafor is associated with an incremental drug cost of less than £2000 when averaged over all patients undergoing peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplant. A CD34+ cell count of <15 µl-1 at the time of recovery after chemomobilization or after four days of G-CSF treatment, or an apheresis yield of <1 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg on the first day of apheresis, could be used to predict the need for pre-emptive plerixafor.


Subject(s)
Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Consensus , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization/methods , Heterocyclic Compounds/therapeutic use , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Benzylamines , Cyclams , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization/economics , Heterocyclic Compounds/economics , Humans , Neoplasms/therapy , Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Peripheral Blood Stem Cells/drug effects , Premedication , Transplantation, Autologous , United Kingdom
3.
Br J Haematol ; 177(2): 287-310, 2017 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28220931

ABSTRACT

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has been used for over 35 years in the treatment of erythrodermic cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) and over 20 years for chronic and acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and solid organ transplant rejection. ECP for CTCL and GvHD is available at specialised centres across the UK. The lack of prospective randomised trials in ECP led to the development of UK Consensus Statements for patient selection, treatment schedules, monitoring protocols and patient assessment criteria for ECP. The recent literature has been reviewed and considered when writing this update. Most notably, the national transition from the UVAR XTS® machine to the new CELLEX machine for ECP with dual access and a shorter treatment time has led to relevant changes in these schedules. This consensus statement updates the previous statement from 2007 on the treatment of CTCL and GvHD with ECP using evidence based medicine and best medical practise and includes guidelines for both children and adults.


Subject(s)
Graft Rejection/therapy , Graft vs Host Disease/therapy , Lymphoma, T-Cell, Cutaneous/therapy , Photopheresis/methods , Consensus , Humans , United Kingdom
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...