Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ann Clin Biochem ; 55(1): 100-106, 2018 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28068806

ABSTRACT

Introduction The ASSIST-CKD project is a national quality improvement programme, aiming to decrease the number of patients presenting late to renal services by enabling laboratories to review up to five years of estimated glomerular filtration rate results graphically and report deteriorating patients to their general practitioner. Aim To assess the impact of the project on the laboratory, and of patient reporting on general practitioner management and the local renal service. Method Each week two searches were performed (Search A: maximum age 65 years, maximum eGFR 50 ml/min/1.73 m2 and Search B: Age 66-120 years, maximum eGFR 40 ml/min/1.73 m2) on patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate requested by their general practitioner within the previous seven days. Patients showing deterioration in estimated glomerular filtration rate had a printed graph sent to their general practitioner. Feedback on the graphs and their impact on patient management were obtained from the general practitioners via a questionnaire. Results A median of 37 patients/week were listed for review for Search A, with 32% reported; and Search B a median of 227 patients/week listed, 32% reported. General practitioner surgery questionnaires (29) showed the reports were well received. Of general practitioners responding to the questionnaire, 67% had reviewed a patient earlier than intended, 54% had reviewed local guidance, 48% had emailed the renal team and 48% had referred a patient on receipt of a graph; 34% had shown a graph to their patients, of whom 70% found that useful. Conclusion There is some evidence that ASSIST-CKD reporting has enhanced patient care; however, further long-term assessment is still required.


Subject(s)
Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , General Practice , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Humans , Kidney Failure, Chronic/physiopathology , Male , Monitoring, Physiologic , Surveys and Questionnaires , United Kingdom
2.
Nephron ; 130(3): 175-81, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26111637

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Publications on acute kidney injury (AKI) have concentrated on the inpatient population. We wanted to determine the extent of AKI in the community, its follow-up and patient impact. METHOD: Primary Care creatinine results for May 2012-April 2013 from Cornwall, United Kingdom, were screened for AKI. RESULTS: Over 12 months, 991 AKI episodes were identified (0.4% of all Primary Care creatinine requests); 51% were AKI1, 29% AKI2 and 10% AKI3. Of these, 51% AKI1s, 72% AKI2s and 77% AKI3s had a repeat creatinine requested within 14 days as per National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines. Admissions (May 2012-July 2013) were identified on 46% AKI1s, 58% AKI2s and 65% AKI3s (p < 0.05). The median time from AKI identification to hospital admission was 33 days for AKI1, 12 days for AKI2 and 1 day for AKI3 (p < 0.05); with a median length of stay of 2, 4 and 7 days, respectively (p < 0.05). The 90-day mortality from AKI identification for the admitted patients was 12% AKI1s, 20% AKI2s and 27% AKI3s (p < 0.05) vs. 11, 21 and 65% (p < 0.05) for those that were not admitted. There was no significant difference in mortality for admitted patients vs. non-admitted patients, except for the AKI3s. CONCLUSION: AKI is associated with increased admission and mortality rates; although a large proportion of patients had repeat creatinine testing within 14 days, there was still a significant number with delayed follow-up. Education within Primary Care is required on how to prevent, identify, follow-up and manage AKI.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury/epidemiology , Creatinine/blood , Acute Kidney Injury/blood , Acute Kidney Injury/mortality , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cause of Death , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Admission/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care , Risk , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Young Adult
3.
Clin Med (Lond) ; 14(1): 22-6, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24532738

ABSTRACT

Early intervention in the management of acute kidney injury (AKI) has been shown to improve outcomes. To facilitate early review we have introduced real time reporting for AKI. An algorithm using the laboratory computer system was implemented to report AKI for inpatients. Over 6 months there were 1,906 AKI reports in 1,518 patients: 56.3% AKI1, 26.9% AKI2 and 16.8% AKI3. 51.0% were male. Median age was 78 (interquartile range [IQR] 17) years. 62.6% were from general medical wards, 16.9% from surgical wards, 6.9% from orthopaedic wards and 5.3% from specialty wards. 8.3% were from peripheral hospitals. 31% of patients with AKI reports were clinically coded for AKI. 9% (n = 139) showed progression of AKI (mortality 42%). Patients with AKI had a significantly higher length of stay and mortality than those that did not. 4% of patients with AKI received acute renal replacement therapy (RRT). An e-alert system is feasible, allowing early identification of inpatients with AKI.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury/diagnosis , Acute Kidney Injury/mortality , Algorithms , Clinical Laboratory Information Systems , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Acute Kidney Injury/classification , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Clinical Alarms , Creatinine/blood , Disease Progression , Early Diagnosis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Recurrence , Renal Replacement Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Severity of Illness Index , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...