An Updated Review on Imaging and Staging of Anal Cancer-Not Just Rectal Cancer.

Anal cancer is a rare disease, but its incidence has been increasing steadily. Primary staging and assessment after chemoradiation therapy are commonly performed using MRI, which is considered to be the preferred imaging modality. CT and PET/CT are useful in evaluating lymph node metastases and distant metastatic disease. Anal squamous-cell carcinoma (ASCC) and rectal adenocarcinoma are typically indistinguishable on MRI, and a biopsy prior to imaging is necessary to accurately stage the tumor and determine the treatment approach. This review discusses the histology, MR technique, diagnosis, staging, and treatment of anal cancer, with a particular focus on the differences in TNM staging between anal and rectal carcinomas. PURPOSE: This review discusses the histology, MR technique, diagnosis, staging, and treatment of anal cancer, with a particular focus on the differences in TNM staging between anal squamous-cell carcinoma (ASCC) and rectal adenocarcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: To conduct this updated review, a comprehensive literature search was performed using prominent medical databases, including PubMed and Embase. The search was limited to articles published within the last 10 years (2013-2023) to ensure their relevance to the current state of knowledge. INCLUSION CRITERIA: (1) articles that provided substantial information on the diagnostic techniques used for ASCC, mainly focusing on imaging, were included; (2) studies reporting on emerging technologies; (3) English-language articles. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: articles that did not meet the inclusion criteria, case reports, or articles with insufficient data. The primary outcome of this review is to assess the accuracy and efficacy of different diagnostic modalities, including CT, MRI, and PET, in diagnosing ASCC. The secondary outcomes are as follows: (1) to identify any advancements or innovations in diagnostic techniques for ASCC over the past decade; (2) to highlight the challenges and limitations of the diagnostic process. RESULTS: ASCC is a rare disease; however, its incidence has been steadily increasing. Primary staging and assessment after chemoradiation therapy are commonly performed using MRI, which is considered to be the preferred imaging modality. CT and PET/CT are useful in evaluating lymph node metastases and distant metastatic disease. CONCLUSION: ASCC and rectal adenocarcinoma are the most common histological subtypes and are typically indistinguishable on MRI; therefore, a biopsy prior to imaging is necessary to stage the tumor accurately and determine the treatment approach.

Identification of glomerulosclerosis using IBM Watson and shallow neural networks.

BACKGROUND: Advanced stages of different renal diseases feature glomerular sclerosis at a histological level which is observed by light microscopy on tissue samples obtained by performing a kidney biopsy. Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems leverage the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare to support physicians in the diagnostic process. METHODS: We propose a novel CAD system that processes histological images and discriminates between sclerotic and non-sclerotic glomeruli. To this goal, we designed, tested, and compared two artificial neural network (ANN) classifiers. The former implements a shallow ANN classifying hand-crafted features extracted from Regions of Interest (ROIs) by means of image-processing procedures. The latter, instead, employs the IBM Watson Visual Recognition System, which uses a deep artificial neural network making decisions taking the images as input, without the need to design any procedure for describing images with features. The input dataset consisted of 428 sclerotic glomeruli and 2344 non-sclerotic glomeruli derived from images of kidney biopsies scanned by the Aperio ScanScope System. RESULTS: Both AI approaches allowed to very accurately distinguish (mean MCC 0.95 and mean Accuracy 0.99) between sclerotic and non-sclerotic glomeruli. Although the systems may seem interchangeable, the approach based on feature extraction and classification would allow clinicians to gain information on the most discriminating features. In fact, further procedures could explain the classifier's decision by analysing which subset of features impacted the most on the final decision. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a customizable support system that can facilitate the work of renal pathologists both in clinical and research settings.