Identification of a novel RAMP-independent CGRP receptor antagonist.

Identification of an HIV integrase inhibitor with micromolar affinity for the CGRP receptor led to the discovery of a series of structurally novel CGRP receptor antagonists. Optimization of this series produced compound 16, a low-molecular weight CGRP receptor antagonist with good pharmacokinetic properties in both rat and dog. In contrast to other nonpeptide antagonists, the activity of 16 was affected by the presence of divalent cations and showed evidence of an alternative, RAMP-independent CGRP receptor binding site.

Identification and pharmacological characterization of domains involved in binding of CGRP receptor antagonists to the calcitonin-like receptor.

The calcitonin-like receptor (CLR) and the calcitonin receptor (CTR) interact with receptor activity-modifying protein 1 (RAMP1) at the cell surface to form heterodimeric receptor complexes. CLR and CTR are members of the class II (family B) G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) and bind calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) with similar affinities when coexpressed with RAMP1. The observation that various nonpeptide CGRP receptor antagonists display a higher affinity for the CLR/RAMP1 complex than for CTR/RAMP1 provided an opportunity to investigate the molecular determinants of the differential receptor affinities of these antagonists. A chimeric receptor approach was utilized to identify key domains within CLR responsible for conferring high-affinity antagonist binding. Initial chimera experiments implicated distinct regions within CLR as responsible for the affinities of structurally diverse CGRP receptor antagonists. Dissection of these key regions implicated amino acids 37-63 located in the amino terminus of CLR as responsible for the high-affinity interaction of one structural class, while transmembrane domain (TM) 7 was responsible for the interaction of a second class of antagonist. A unique binding interaction in the amino terminus of CLR is consistent with the observation that these compounds also interact with the extracellular region of RAMP1 and could suggest the formation of a binding pocket between the two proteins. Conversely, a compound which interacted with TM7 did not display a similar RAMP1 dependence, suggesting an allosteric mechanism of antagonism. Collectively, these data provide insight into two alternative mechanisms of antagonism for this unique heterodimeric receptor complex.

Effects of inhibition of alpha-CGRP receptors on cardiac and peripheral vascular dynamics in conscious dogs with chronic heart failure.

Whether endogenous calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) plays a role in heart failure is unclear. Seven dogs were instrumented with left ventricular (LV) pressure gauges, pacers, coronary occluder and aortic, atrial, and coronary sinus catheters. Hemodynamic recordings and response to alpha-CGRP challenge were obtained for baseline in the conscious state. Rapid pacing (240 beats/min) was then initiated. The coronary artery was occluded for 90 minutes followed by reperfusion after 2 weeks of pacing. After 6 weeks of pacing, LV pressure (-11 +/- 6%), LV dP/dt (-53 +/- 5%), and mean arterial pressure (-15 +/- 4%) decreased (P < 0.01), while left atrial pressure (+19 +/- 3 mm Hg from 7 +/- 1 mm Hg) and heart rate (+53 +/- 16%) increased (P < 0.01). Infusion of the alpha-CGRP receptor antagonist alpha-CGRP[8-37] (30 microg/kg/min, i.v.), which blocked the exogenous alpha-CGRP challenge, did not affect any of these indices. Regional blood flow, as measured by the microsphere technique, in the nonischemic myocardium, as well as cerebral and renal vasculatures were unaltered during the infusion of alpha-CGRP[8-37]. Plasma concentrations of CGRP from both arterial and coronary sinus samples were unchanged after 6 weeks of pacing as compared with control. Thus, we conclude that endogenous alpha-CGRP does not appear to play a major role in the regulation of cardiac and peripheral vascular dynamics in the late stage of heart failure.

Receptor activity-modifying protein 1 determines the species selectivity of non-peptide CGRP receptor antagonists.

The heterodimeric CGRP receptor requires co-expression of calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CRLR) and an accessory protein called receptor activity-modifying protein (RAMP) 1 (McLatchie, L. M., Fraser, N. J., Main, M. J., Wise, A., Brown, J., Thompson, N., Solari, R., Lee, M. G., and Foord, S. M. (1998) Nature 393, 333-339). Several non-peptide CGRP receptor antagonists have been shown to exhibit marked species selectivity, with >100-fold higher affinities for the human CGRP receptor than for receptors from other species (Doods, H., Hallermayer, G., Wu, D., Entzeroth, M., Rudolf, K., Engel, W., and Eberlein, W. (2000) Br. J. Pharmacol. 129, 420-423; Edvinsson, L., Sams, A., Jansen-Olesen, I., Tajti, J., Kane, S. A., Rutledge, R. Z., Koblan, K. S., Hill, R. G., and Longmore, J. (2001) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 415, 39-44). This observation provided an opportunity to map the determinants of receptor affinity exhibited by BIBN4096BS and the truncated analogs, Compounds 1 and 2. All three compounds exhibited higher affinity for the human receptor, human CRLR/human RAMP1, than for the rat receptor, rat CRLR/rat RAMP1. We have now demonstrated that this species selectivity was directed exclusively by RAMP1. By generating recombinant human/rat CRLR/RAMP1 receptors, we demonstrated that co-expression of human CRLR with rat RAMP1 produced rat receptor pharmacology, and vice versa. Moreover, with rat/human RAMP1 chimeras and site-directed mutants, we have identified a single amino acid at position 74 of RAMP1 that modulates the affinity of small molecule antagonists for CRLR/RAMP1. Replacement of lysine 74 in rat RAMP1 with tryptophan (the homologous amino acid in the human receptor) resulted in a > or =100-fold increase in antagonist affinities, similar to the K(i) values for the human receptor. These observations suggest that important determinants of small molecule antagonist affinity for the CGRP receptor reside within the extracellular region of RAMP1 and provide evidence that this receptor accessory protein may participate in antagonist binding.