ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cancer vaccines and T-cell receptor (TCR) engineered T cells (Tg-T cell) represent two different therapeutic strategies that can target the same tumour epitopes. The first approach requires the induction of a specific immune response in patients, while the second relies on the efficacy of adoptively transferred T cells. Because the ratio of antigen-specific T cells to tumour cells engaged by these strategies may influence the clinical outcome, we evaluated the efficacy of these two therapeutic approaches in solid tumours according to the tumour burden. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis restricted to the therapeutic vaccine and Tg-T cell trials, presenting annotated individual clinical data. We adapted a previously published mathematical model for tumour immune dynamics to estimate the clinical impact of the number of specific T cells in regard to the tumour burden. RESULTS: A focused analysis of Tg-T cell studies revealed that clinical responses were mostly observed with the highest doses of infused T cells, suggesting that exceeding a threshold of effector T cells may be required for clinical efficacy. In silico modelling of cancer vaccine and Tg-T cell therapies starting at different tumour burdens showed that therapeutic vaccines control low or moderate tumour burdens, whereas increasing the amount of infused Tg-T cells succeeds in controlling high tumour masses. CONCLUSION: We propose that therapeutic vaccines should be considered in the context of low or moderate tumour burden, whereas Tg-T cell strategies may be more adapted for the treatment of advanced metastatic diseases.
