ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic splenectomy is currently the procedure of choice for elective splenectomy. This study reviews the initial 100 laparoscopic splenectomies completed at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation. METHODS: A retrospective review of elective laparoscopic splenectomy was performed to assess clinical outcomes at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation. Patient demographics, preoperative diagnoses, operative characteristics, morbidity, and mortality were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 169 elective splenectomies completed over a 4-year period from 1995 to 1999, 100 were attempted laparoscopically. The proportions of all splenectomies attempted laparoscopically by year were 17%, 38%, 75%, and 72%. Nearly 70% of splenectomies were performed for idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura or malignancy. Overall, the mean blood loss was 181 ml, and the mean operative time was 170 min. Splenomegaly occurred in 31% of the patients and accounted for longer operative times. Three patients required conversion to an open procedure. Postoperative complications were seen in 13% of the patients. One patient died in the postoperative period from staphylococcal sepsis, giving a mortality rate of 1%. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic splenectomy currently is the procedure of choice for elective splenectomy at our institution. As compared with traditional open splenectomy, laparoscopic splenectomy results in minimal morbidity even in the setting of splenomegaly.
Subject(s)
Laparoscopy/methods , Splenectomy/methods , Elective Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Elective Surgical Procedures/methods , Female , Humans , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/microbiology , Retrospective Studies , Splenectomy/adverse effects , Staphylococcal Infections/etiology , Surgical Wound Infection/microbiology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
The merits of laparoscopic cholecystectomy include faster recovery, less postoperative pain, earlier return to work, and decreased cost. However, there are few economic data comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy in an ambulatory versus overnight stay setting. In a 12-month period, 74 consecutive cholecystectomies were performed laparoscopically by one surgeon. The ambulatory group consisted of 36 patients who were discharged from the hospital the same day after a mean recovery time of 5 hours (range, 2.25-10.33). Of the remaining 38 patients, 19 were admitted after surgery on 23-hour observation status, and 19 were inpatients. The average hospital cost was significantly less in the ambulatory group than in the observation group, with an 11% mean reduction in cost per patient (P = 0.0061). No patient in either group was readmitted to the hospital within 30 days of surgery. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be performed safely in an outpatient setting. The cost savings of ambulatory care versus observation are clearly shown in this study.
