Validation of F3ALLS Assessment in Older Adults.

OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to evaluate the brief F3ALLS assessment's validity in screening fall risk. DESIGN: This is a cross sectional and longitudinal study. SETTING: Participants were recruited from outpatient primary care clinics. PARTICIPANTS: Older ambulatory adults ages 65-90 volunteered for this study. MEASUREMENTS: Falls risk was measured with TGBA and F3ALLS questionnaires. A 6-month follow-up period assessed for falls using falls diaries and chart review. RESULTS: Participants (n=97) were older adults ages 73.91±6.4, 68% (n=66) female. 31% of participants reported at least one fall at 6-months. F3ALLS scores were higher in participants who reported 1 or more falls at 6-months follow-up (3.23±1.5). Higher F3ALLS scores were associated with 6-month fall risk (OR=1.463, 95% CI=1.098-1.949). A score > 3 stratified patients as at risk of falling (AUC=0.77, P<.001; Sensitivity=0.65, Specificity=0.71). CONCLUSION: The F3ALLS questionnaire adequately classifies person at risk versus not at risk for falls, and higher (worse) F3ALLS scores are associated with falls over 6 months.

Validation of the Saint Louis University Quality of Life Questionnaire in Older Adults with Alzheimer's Disease.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia and negatively impacts individuals' quality of life (QOL). One essential component of disease management in older adults with AD is the maintenance and improvement of QOL. The QOL-AD is a tool that can be administered to evaluate QOL in AD patients, but it can take too long to administer in a patient visit. The purpose of this study was to investigate the validity of a more brief, 6-item QOL questionnaire, LIFEAD, comparing it to the QOL-AD in older adults with mild to moderate cognitive dysfunction. DESIGN: Prospective validation study. SETTING: Participants were patients presenting to internal medicine and geriatrics outpatient clinics and a nursing home. PARTICIPANTS: 285 adults 65 and older with mild to moderate cognitive impairment. MEASUREMENTS: QOL was assessed using LIFEAD and the QOL-AD. Demographic data were collected and level of depression was determined through a demographic questionnaire and the PHQ-8, respectively. RESULTS: QOL-AD mean item scores ranged from 2.27-3.32 with an average scale total of 36.28 ± 6.48. LIFEAD mean item scores ranged from 2.26-2.51 with an average scale total of 14.28 ± 2.87. A majority (68%) of patients rated all items on LIFEAD as either average or good. The correlation between LIFEAD and the QOL-AD was 0.71 (p<0.001). Both LIFEAD and the QOL-AD showed strong internal consistency with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.82 and 0.87, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study validated LIFEAD and exhibited LIFEAD can assess QOL in older adults with mild to moderate cognitive dysfunction in the clinic or nursing home. LIFEAD is a short, practical questionnaire and is easily administered in approximately 1 minute. Further research on LIFEAD could be done with larger samples, in different clinical populations, and including persons of other ethnic backgrounds.

Screening for Vitamin D Deficiency in Black Americans: Comparison of Total, Free, Bioavailable 25 Hydroxy Vitamin D Levels with Parathyroid Hormone Levels and Bone Mineral Density.

OBJECTIVES: There is debate surrounding the adequacy of total and free 25 hydroxy vitamin D [25(OH)D] levels in black Americans who have inherently high bone mineral density [BMD] and low serum concentration of vitamin D binding proteins [VDBP]. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of serum samples and BMD analyses from the African American Health Study [AAHS] cohort. SETTING: The AAHS is a population-based longitudinal study initiated to examine issues of disability and frailty among urban-dwelling black Americans in the city of Saint Louis, Missouri. PARTICIPANTS: 122 men and 206 women, age 60.2 ± 4.3 years. INTERVENTION: Retrospective analysis. MEASUREMENTS: Total 25(OH)D, VDBP, PTH, and BMD of the lumbar spine and hip by dual energy x-ray photometry (DXA). Free and bioavailable vitamin D levels were calculated using serum concentrations and affinity constants for the VDBP (Gc1F and Gc1S) phenotypes. RESULTS: Serum total 25(OH)D levels were 14.6 ± 8.9 ng/mL (36 ± 22 nmol/L). Vitamin D insufficiency was estimated by compensatory elevations of PTH above the normal range (> 65 pg/mL). PTH levels were within the normal reference range in > 95% of the samples at total 25(OH)D levels ≥ 20 ng/mL (≥50 nmol/L). There was no difference in the correlation of the reciprocal relationship of vitamin D vs parathyroid hormone between the VDBP phenotypes. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses indicated that serum total 25(OH)D discriminated sufficiency from insufficiency at least as well as the calculated levels of the free and bioavailable vitamin D. Very low levels of total 25(OH)D (≤ 8 ng/mL, ≤20 nmol/L) were associated with decreased BMD (p=0.02), but higher levels of 25(OH)D did not show statistical differences in BMD. CONCLUSION: Total 25(OH)D levels of ≤ 8ng/mL (≤20 nmol/L) are associated with clinically significant changes in BMD, whereas total 25(OH)D levels ≥ 20 ng/mL (≥50 nmol/L) suppressed PTH and were not associated with deficiencies in BMD. Lower levels of 25(OH)D may be acceptable for bone health in black than in white Americans.

Initial Validation of the Toulouse St. Louis University Mini Falls Assessment in Older Adults.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Falls are one of the most prevalent health issues facing older adults. This study examines the validity of the Toulouse-St. Louis University Mini Falls Assessment (TSLUMFA). Objectives were to validate the TSLUMFA by testing if it differentiates between prior non fallers (n=80) and fallers (n=23), and predicts future falls as well as or better than the gold standard Tinetti Gait and Balance Instrument (TGBI). Examine if the subset of FRAIL Scale items on the TSLUMFA distinguishes between previous non fallers (n=75) and fallers (n=20), and predicts future falls as well as or better than the TGBI. Identify TSLUMFA cut offs scores for fall risk. DESIGN: Prospective validation study. SETTING: Participants were ambulatory patients presenting to the SLU Geriatrics Clinic. PARTICIPANTS: 103 ambulatory older adults. MEASUREMENTS: Fall risk was assessed using the three assessments. Outcome measures were previous falls and follow up falls. RESULTS: TSLUMFA, FRAIL, and TGBI differentiated between previous fallers and non fallers. A TSLUMFA score <23 stratified patients as moderate risk (Sensitivity=0.806 Specificity=0.776) and a score <21 stratified patients as high risk (Sensitivity=0.929 Specificity=0.897). 78% of patients (n=80) participated in follow up and 20% (n=16) of these patients fell during follow up. TSLUMFA and TGBI absolute scores were lower among patients who fell during the follow up period versus non fallers but the observed differences were not statistically significant (TSLUMFA P=0.123 and TGBI P=0.074). CONCLUSION: This study validated the TSLUMFA and FRAIL. No test predicted falls with statistical significance (most likely due to the low follow up participation) but a positive trend was seen. Clinical recommendations from this study are to use the FRAIL as an initial fall screen and patients scoring > 3 should be analyzed by TSLUMFA. The TSLUMFA's advantage is that it pinpoints areas that will directly benefit from therapy to reduce falls.

Fruit and Vegetable Intake and Physical Activity as Predictors of Disability Risk Factors in African-American Middle-Aged Individuals.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate fruit and vegetable intake (FVI) and different dimensions of physical activity (PA) as predictors of change in disabilities and other known precursors of progressive disability in a population-based sample of African Americans. DESIGN: Longitudinal investigation of the independent associations of reported FVI and PA with six-year changes in disabilities and other known precursors of progressive disability. SETTING: Longitudinal study of a population-representative cohort of late middle-aged African Americans. PARTICIPANTS: 432 cohort participants with complete information on all measures. Measurements and Analytic Approach: During wave 8 (2008), FVI was measured using 2005 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System questions and PA dimensions using the Yale Physical Activity Survey (YPAS). Disability measures included basic activities of daily living (ADLs) and instrumental ADLs (IADLs); other precursors included measured gait speed, grip strength, and short physical performance battery (SPPB) and reported lower body functional limitations (LBFLs) and FRAIL scale; these were measured at wave 4 (2004) and wave 10 (2010). Residual-change score linear regression was used to identify FVI and PA factors that were independently associated with six-year changes in disability and other precursors. RESULTS: The study cohort was less active than the YPAS-development group. Longitudinally, leisurely walking was independently associated with better ADL, IADL, grip strength, SPPB, LBFL, and frailty outcomes; standing with better IADL and SPPB; intake of vegetables other than carrots, salads, or potatoes with better grip strength and frailty; and fruit juice intake with worse grip strength and frailty. CONCLUSIONS: In this relatively inactive cohort, leisurely walking was associated with multiple beneficial outcomes. Benefits were also seen with vegetables other than potato intake, and fruit juice intake was associated with detrimental effects. This study highlights the importance of finding strategies to help this population increase PA (especially leisurely walking) and intake of whole fruits and vegetables.

Frailty, Diabetes, and Mortality in Middle-Aged African Americans.

BACKGROUND: Older adult frail diabetics have high mortality risk, but data are limited regarding frail late middle-aged diabetics, especially for African-Americans. The aim of this study is to examine the association of diabetes with health outcomes and frailty in the African American Health (AAH) study. METHODS: AAH is a population-based longitudinal cohort study. Participants were African Americans (N=998) ages 49 to 65 years at baseline. Cross-sectional comparisons for diabetes included disability, function, physical performance, cytokines, and frailty. Frailty measures included the International Academy of Nutrition and Aging [FRAIL] frailty scale, Study of Osteoporotic Fractures [SOF] frailty scale, Cardiovascular Health Study [CHS] frailty scale, and Frailty Index [FI]). Longitudinal associations for diabetes included new ADLs ≥ 1 and mortality at 9-year follow-up. RESULTS: Diabetics were more likely to be frail using any of the 4 frailty scales than were non-diabetics. Frail diabetics, compared to nonfrail diabetics, reported significantly increased falls in last 1 year, higher IADLs and higher LBFLs. They demonstrated worse performance on the SPPB, one-leg stand, and grip strength; and higher Tumor Necrosis Factor receptors (sTNFR1 and sTNFR2). Mortality and 1 or more new ADLs also were increased among frail compared to nonfrail diabetics when followed for 9 years. CONCLUSIONS: Frailty in middle-aged African American persons with diabetes is associated with having more disability and functional limitations, worse physical performance, and higher cytokines (sTNFR1 and sTNFR2 only). Middle-aged African Americans with diabetes have an increased risk of mortality and frail diabetics have an even higher risk of death, compared to nonfrail diabetics.

FRAIL-NH Predicts Outcomes in Long Term Care.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: To investigate the predictive validity of the short, simple FRAIL-NH frailty screening tool in the long term care population and to then compare the predictive validity with the frailty index (FI) for 6-month adverse health outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective study using the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 and chart review from June-December 2014. SETTING: Two Long Term Care Facilities in Saint Louis, MO. PARTICIPANTS: 270 patients ages ≥ 65 years old residing in long term care. MEASUREMENTS: Frailty was measured using the FRAIL-NH and Frailty Index (FI) criteria. Adverse outcomes measured at 6-month follow-up included falls, hospitalizations, and hospice enrollment/mortality. RESULTS: Based on screening tool used frailty prevalence was 48.7% for FRAIL-NH and 30.3% for FI. The FRAIL-NH pre-frail (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR]=2.62; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]=1.25-5.54; p=0.11) classification was associated with 6 month risk of falling and mortality/hospice enrollment was associated with the frail classification, AOR=3.96 (1.44-10.87, p=0.007). Combining the pre-frail and frail categories both measures predicted 6 month mortality with the FRAIL-NH being the strongest predictor (AOR=3.36; 95%CI=1.26-8.98; p=0.016) and the FI was a more modest predictor with an AOR of 2.28; 95%CI=1.01-5.15; p=0.047. When directly comparing the FRAIL-NH to the FI, the FRAIL-NH pre-frail were at increased risk of falling, AOR=2.42 (1.11-5.92, p=0.027) and the FRAIL-NH frail were at increased risk of hospice enrollment/death, OR=3.25 (1.04- 10.86) p=0.044. CONCLUSION: In comparison to the FI, the FRAIL-NH preformed just as well at screening for frailty and was a slightly better predictor of adverse outcomes. The FRAIL-NH is a brief, easy-to-administer frailty screening tool appropriate for long term care patients and predicts increased risk of falls in the pre-frail and mortality/hospice enrollment in the frail.

The Rapid Cognitive Screen (RCS): A Point-of-Care Screening for Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment.

OBJECTIVES: There is a need for a rapid screening test for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia to be used by primary care physicians. The Rapid Cognitive Screen (RCS) is a brief screening tool (< 3 min) for cognitive dysfunction. RCS includes 3-items from the Veterans Affairs Saint Louis University Mental Status (SLUMS) exam: recall, clock drawing, and insight. Study objectives were to: 1) examine the RCS sensitivity and specificity for MCI and dementia, 2) evaluate the RCS predictive validity for nursing home placement and mortality, and 3) compare the RCS to the clock drawing test (CDT) plus recall. METHODS: Patients were recruited from the St. Louis, MO Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) hospitals (study 1) or the Saint Louis University Geriatric Medicine and Psychiatry outpatient clinics (study 2). Study 1 participants (N=702; ages 65-92) completed cognitive evaluations and 76% (n=533/706) were followed up to 7.5 years for nursing home placement and mortality. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were computed to determine sensitivity and specificity for MCI (n=180) and dementia (n=82). Logistic regressions were computed for nursing home placement (n=31) and mortality (n=176). Study 2 participants (N=168; ages 60-90) completed the RCS and SLUMS exam. ROC curves were computed to determine sensitivity and specificity for MCI (n=61) and dementia (n=74). RESULTS: RCS predicted dementia and MCI in study 1 with optimal cutoff scores of ≤ 5 for dementia (sensitivity=0.89, specificity=0.94) and ≤ 7 for MCI (sensitivity=0.87, specificity=0.70). The CDT plus recall predicted dementia and MCI in study 1 with optimal cutoff scores of ≤ 2 for dementia (sensitivity=0.87, specificity=0.85) and ≤ 3 for MCI (sensitivity=0.62, specificity=0.62). Higher RCS scores were protective against nursing home placement and mortality. The RCS predicted dementia and MCI in study 2. CONCLUSIONS: The 3-item RCS exhibits good sensitivity and specificity for the detection of MCI and dementia, and higher cognitive function on the RCS is protective against nursing home placement and mortality. The RCS may be a useful screening instrument for the detection of cognitive dysfunction in the primary care setting.

A pilot study of the SARC-F scale on screening sarcopenia and physical disability in the Chinese older people.

INTRODUCTION: The SARC-F scale is a newly developed tool to diagnose sarcopenia and obviate the need for measurement of muscle mass. SARC-F ≥ 4 is defined as sarcopenia. The questions of SARC-F cover physical functions targeting sarcopenia or initial presentation for sarcopenia. The aim of the study is to explore the application of SARC-F in the Chinese people. METHODS: Two hundred thirty Chinese people over 65 years old were assessed by the SARC-F scale, PSMS, Lawton IADL and the shortened version of the falls efficacy scale-international(the short FES-I). Hospitalization was investigated. Physical performance and strength were measured. The association of SARC-F with other scales or tests was analyzed. RESULTS: Poor physical performance and grip strength were associated with SARC-F ≥ 4 independently (P<0.005). The κ value for agreement of SARC-F ≥ 4 and cutoff points of tests were 0.391 to 0.635. The short FES-I were correlated to SARC-F scores (Spearman's coefficient 0.692). Poor PSMS and Lawton IADL scores were associated with SARC-F ≥ 4(P=0.000) and SARC-F ≥ 4 was associated with hospitalization in the past 2 years (P=0.000). CONCLUSION: The SARC-F scale can identify old Chinese people with impaired physical function who may suffered from sarcopenia. SARC-F judgment reflects fear of falling, indicates the hospitalization events and is associated with ability of daily life. Thus, SARC-F may be a simple and useful tool for screening individuals with impaired physical function. Further studies on SARC-F in Chinese people would be worthy.

A simple frailty questionnaire (FRAIL) predicts outcomes in middle aged African Americans.

OBJECTIVE: To validate the FRAIL scale. DESIGN: Longitudinal study. SETTING: Community. PARTICIPANTS: Representative sample of African Americans age 49 to 65 years at onset of study. MEASUREMENTS: The 5-item FRAIL scale (fatigue, resistance, ambulation, illnesses, and loss of weight), at baseline and activities of daily living (ADLs), instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs), mortality, short physical performance battery (SPPB), gait speed, one-leg stand, grip strength and injurious falls at baseline and 9 years. Blood tests for CRP, SIL6R, STNFR1, STNFR2 and 25 (OH) vitamin D at baseline. RESULTS: Cross-sectionally the FRAIL scale correlated significantly with IADL difficulties, SPPB, grip strength and one-leg stand among participants with no baseline ADL difficulties (N=703) and those outcomes plus gait speed in those with no baseline ADL dependencies (N=883). TNFR1 was increased in pre-frail and frail subjects and CRP in some subgroups. Longitudinally (N=423 with no baseline ADL difficulties or N=528 with no baseline ADL dependencies), and adjusted for the baseline value for each outcome, being pre-frail at baseline significantly predicted future ADL difficulties, worse one-leg stand scores, and mortality in both groups, plus IADL difficulties in the dependence-excluded group. Being frail at baseline significantly predicted future ADL difficulties, IADL difficulties, and mortality in both groups, plus worse SPPB in the dependence-excluded group. CONCLUSION: This study has validated the FRAIL scale in a late middle-aged African American population. This simple 5-question scale is an excellent screening test for clinicians to identify frail persons at risk of developing disability as well as decline in health functioning and mortality.

The Veterans Affairs Saint Louis University mental status exam (SLUMS exam) and the Mini-mental status exam as predictors of mortality and institutionalization.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate predictive validity of cognitive dysfunction of the Saint Louis University mental status (SLUMS) exam or mini-mental state exam (MMSE) for institutionalization and mortality after 7.5-years. DESIGN: Longitudinal study. SETTING: Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center Veterans Affairs Hospital St. Louis, MO. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=705) were screened for cognitive dysfunction in 2003 using the SLUMS exam and MMSE, and mortality and institutionalization up to 7.5-years later were evaluated as outcome measures. MEASUREMENT: The associations between outcome measures and MMSE and SLUMS exam total scores, and cognitive status were examined using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional-hazards regression. RESULTS: Five hundred thirty-three charts were reviewed, 176/533(33%) patients had died and 31/526 (6%) were institutionalized during 7.5-year follow-up period. All subjects were male with a mean age of 75 years and most had high school education or greater (71%). MMSE dementia, SLUMS dementia (ps<.001) and MCI (p<.05) groups had significantly lower survival rates than normal cognition group in the Kaplan-Meier curves. Scores classified as dementia on SLUMS (HR=2.4, 95% CI 1.6-3.7; p <.001) or MMSE (HR=2.3, 95% CI 1.5-3.6; p <.001) both predicted mortality and, also, institutionalization (SLUMS: HR=3.5, 95% CI 1.3-9.1; p <.01; MMSE: HR=3.8, 95% CI 1.6-9.0; p <.001) after adjustment for covariates. Unadjusted SLUMS exam MCI predicted morality (HR=1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.2; p <.019) but not institutionalization. CONCLUSION: The SLUMS exam and MMSE both predict mortality and institutionalization for male patients screened as positive for dementia.