Chromatin remodelling protein SMAR1 inhibits p53 dependent transactivation by regulating acetyl transferase p300.

Acetylation of p53 is indispensable for its transcriptional activities and induction of apoptosis upon DNA damage. Here, we show that chromatin remodelling protein SMAR1 inhibits p53 acetylation and p53 dependent apoptosis by repressing p300 expression in response to DNA damage. The repression of p300 expression by SMAR1 is relieved upon treatment with proteosomal inhibitors MG132 and Lactacystin. We demonstrate that SMAR1 interacts with p53-p300 transcriptional complex and SMAR1 overexpression antagonizes p300 interaction with p53 and suppresses activation of p53 apoptotic targets and p53 regulated miRNA miR-34a. Conversely, knockdown of SMAR1 promotes p300 accumulation and p53 acetylation while ectopic expression of p300 rescues SMAR1 inhibition on p53. Collectively, these results indicate that SMAR1 is an important player in p300-p53 regulated DNA damage signalling pathway and can exert its effect on apoptosis in a transcription independent manner.

Gene regulation by SMAR1: Role in cellular homeostasis and cancer.

Changes in the composition of nuclear matrix associated proteins contribute to alterations in nuclear structure, one of the major phenotypes of malignant cancer cells. The malignancy-induced changes in this structure lead to alterations in chromatin folding, the fidelity of genome replication and gene expression programs. The nuclear matrix forms a scaffold upon which the chromatin is organized into periodic loop domains called matrix attachment regions (MAR) by binding to various MAR binding proteins (MARBPs). Aberrant expression of MARBPs modulates the chromatin organization and disrupt transcriptional network that leads to oncogenesis. Dysregulation of nuclear matrix associated MARBPs has been reported in different types of cancers. Some of these proteins have tumor specific expression and are therefore considered as promising diagnostic or prognostic markers in few cancers. SMAR1 (scaffold/matrix attachment region binding protein 1), is one such nuclear matrix associated protein whose expression is drastically reduced in higher grades of breast cancer. SMAR1 gene is located on human chromosome 16q24.3 locus, the loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of which has been reported in several types of cancers. This review elaborates on the multiple roles of nuclear matrix associated protein SMAR1 in regulating various cellular target genes involved in cell growth, apoptosis and tumorigenesis.

Coordinated regulation of p53 apoptotic targets BAX and PUMA by SMAR1 through an identical MAR element.

How tumour suppressor p53 bifurcates cell cycle arrest and apoptosis and executes these distinct pathways is not clearly understood. We show that BAX and PUMA promoters harbour an identical MAR element and are transcriptional targets of SMAR1. On mild DNA damage, SMAR1 selectively represses BAX and PUMA through binding to the MAR independently of inducing p53 deacetylation through HDAC1. This generates an anti-apoptotic response leading to cell cycle arrest. Importantly, knockdown of SMAR1 induces apoptosis, which is abrogated in the absence of p53. Conversely, apoptotic DNA damage results in increased size and number of promyelocytic leukaemia (PML) nuclear bodies with consequent sequestration of SMAR1. This facilitates p53 acetylation and restricts SMAR1 binding to BAX and PUMA MAR leading to apoptosis. Thus, our study establishes MAR as a damage responsive cis element and SMAR1-PML crosstalk as a switch that modulates the decision between cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in response to DNA damage.

Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha (TNFalpha) regulates CD40 expression through SMAR1 phosphorylation.

CD40 plays an important role in mediating inflammatory response and is mainly induced by JAK/STAT phosphorylation cascade. TNFalpha is the key cytokine that activates CD40 during inflammation and tumorigenesis. We have earlier shown that SMAR1 can repress the transcription of Cyclin D1 promoter by forming a HDAC1 dependent repressor complex. In this study, we show that SMAR1 regulates the transcription of NF-kappaB target gene CD40. SMAR1 recruits HDAC1 and forms a repressor complex on CD40 promoter and keeps its basal transcription in check. Further, we show that TNFalpha stimulation induces SMAR1 phosphorylation at Ser-347 and promotes its cytoplasmic translocation, thus releasing its negative effect. Concomitantly, TNFalpha induced phosphorylation of STAT1 at Tyr-701 by JAK1 facilitates its nuclear translocation and activation of CD40 through p300 recruitment and core Histone-3 acetylation. Thus, TNFalpha mediated regulation of CD40 expression occurs by dual phosphorylation of SMAR1 and STAT1.

Tumor suppressor SMAR1 represses IkappaBalpha expression and inhibits p65 transactivation through matrix attachment regions.

Aberrant NF-kappaB activity promotes tumorigenesis. However, NF-kappaB also inhibits tumor growth where tumor suppressor pathways remain unaltered. Thus, its role in tumorigenesis depends upon the function of other cellular factors. Tumor suppressor SMAR1 down-modulated in high grade breast cancers is regulated by p53 and is reported to interact and stabilize p53. Because both SMAR1 and NF-kappaB are involved in tumorigenesis, we investigated the effect of SMAR1 upon NF-kappaB activity. We show that SMAR1 induction by doxorubicin or overexpression produces functional NF-kappaB complexes that are competent for binding to NF-kappaB consensus sequence. However, SMAR1 induced p65-p50 complex is phosphorylation- and transactivation-deficient. Induction of functional NF-kappaB complexes stems from down-regulation of IkappaBalpha transcription through direct binding of SMAR1 to the matrix attachment region site present in IkappaBalpha promoter and recruitment of corepressor complex. Real time PCR array for NF-kappaB target genes revealed that SMAR1 down-regulates a subset of NF-kappaB target genes that are involved in tumorigenesis. We also show that SMAR1 inhibits tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced induction of NF-kappaB suggesting that activation of NF-kappaB by SMAR1 is independent and different from classical pathway. Thus, for the first time we report that a tumor suppressor protein SMAR1 can modulate NF-kappaB transactivation and inhibit tumorigenesis by regulating NF-kappaB target genes.

Comparative evaluation of Löwenstein-Jensen proportion method, BacT/ALERT 3D system, and enzymatic pyrazinamidase assay for pyrazinamide susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Pyrazinamide (PZA) is an important first-line antituberculosis drug because of its sterilizing activity against semidormant tubercle bacilli. In spite of its very high in vivo activity, its in vitro activity is not apparent unless an acidic environment is available, which makes PZA susceptibility testing difficult by conventional methods. The present study was, therefore, planned to assess the performance of the colorimetric BacT/ALERT 3D system and compare the results with those from conventional tests, i.e., the Löwenstein-Jensen (LJ) proportion method (pH 4.85) and Wayne's pyrazinamidase (PZase) assay, using 107 clinical isolates. The concordance among all of these tests was 89.71% after the first round of testing and reached 92.52% after resolution of the discordant results by retesting. Prolonged incubation of the PZase tube for up to 10 days was found to increase the specificity of the PZase test. The concordances between LJ proportion and BacT/ALERT 3D, LJ proportion and the PZase assay, and BacT/ALERT 3D and the PZase assay were found to be 99.06%, 93.46%, and 92.52%, respectively. Using the LJ results as the gold standard, the sensitivities of BacT/ALERT 3D and the PZase assay were 100 and 82.85%, respectively, while the specificity was 98.61% for both of the tests. The difference between the sensitivities of BacT/ALERT 3D and the PZase assay was significant (P = 0.025). The mean turnaround times for the detection of resistant and susceptible results by BacT/ALERT 3D were 8.04 and 11.32 days, respectively. While the major limitations associated with the PZase assay and the LJ proportion method are lower sensitivity in previously treated patients and a longer time requirement, respectively, the BacT/ALERT 3D system was found to be rapid, highly sensitive, and specific.