ABSTRACT
Background Due to the slow progression of many chronic liver diseases, including hepatitis C, it is not practical or safe to monitor disease progression by serial liver biopsies. Noninvasive laboratory scoring systems based on routine laboratory tests are appealing surrogate markers of liver fibrosis for the staging and monitoring of chronic liver diseases such as hepatitis C. Methods We explored the accuracy of three scoring systems: the fibrosis-4 score (FIB-4), the aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI score), and the aspartate aminotransferase to alanine aminotransferase ratio (AAR) in 496 patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection who had undergone percutaneous liver biopsy at a viral hepatitis clinic in Shreveport, Louisiana. Results For FIB-4, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for hepatic fibrosis stages ≥ 1, ≥ 2, ≥ 3, and 4 (cirrhosis) ranged from 0.74 (95% CI, 0.678 - 0.802) to 0.802 (95% CI, 0.751 - 0.854). At a cutoff value of 1.45, FIB-4 was 82% sensitive for advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis (stage 3 or 4) but was only 58% specific for these findings. Increasing the FIB-4 cutoff value to 3.25 reduced the sensitivity for detecting advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis to 39%, but this higher cutoff was 92% specific for these findings. Corresponding AUROCs for the APRI and AAR scores were inferior to FIB-4. Conclusion The FIB-4 index outperformed APRI and AAR in our HCV infected population in predicting severe fibrosis or cirrhosis.
ABSTRACT
AIM: To assess the effect of treating chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection with direct acting antiviral drugs (DAAs) on glycemic control in patients with concomitant diabetes mellitus (DM). METHODS: We performed a retrospective case-control study in a viral hepatitis ambulatory clinic in Shreveport, Louisiana, during the period 11/01/2014 to 12/31/2017. All the clinic patient ages 18 years and above with treatment-naïve/biopsy-proven chronic hepatitis C and DM (hemoglobin A1C level ≥ 6.5%) who were eligible for treatment were included in the study. Of 118 such patients, 59 were treated with oral DAAs for 8-12 weeks with the goal of achieving a sustained virologic response (SVR). A control group of 59 patients did not receive treatment for their hepatitis C and was followed in the clinic. Patients in the control group did not receive treatment either due to insurance issues or refusal of hepatitis C treatment. RESULTS: Fifty-five of the 59 patients treated with DAAs (93%) achieved a SVR. Six months after treatment completion, their mean ± SEM HbA1C level had decreased by 1.1 ± 0.03% (P < 0.0001). Four of the 59 patients treated with DAAs did not achieve a SVR. Their mean HbA1C 6 months after treatment completion had increased by 0.8 ± 0.2%. Furthermore, there was no improvement in HbA1C levels over time in the untreated group (mean HbA1C increase, 0.2 ± 0.05%; P < 0.0001 vs. the treatment group, which had a mean HbA1C decrease of 0.9 ± 0.2%). CONCLUSION: This controlled study demonstrated that treatment of chronic hepatitis C with DAAs results in statistically significant and meaningful reductions in hemoglobin A1C levels in patients with coexisting diabetic mellitus if a SVR is achieved.
