Niraparib Shows Superior Tissue Distribution and Efficacy in a Prostate Cancer Bone Metastasis Model Compared with Other PARP Inhibitors.

Patients with prostate cancer whose tumors bear deleterious mutations in DNA-repair pathways often respond to PARP inhibitors. Studies were conducted to compare the activity of several PARP inhibitors in vitro and their tissue exposure and in vivo efficacy in mice bearing PC-3M-luc-C6 prostate tumors grown subcutaneously or in bone. Niraparib, olaparib, rucaparib, and talazoparib were compared in proliferation assays, using several prostate tumor cell lines and in a cell-free PARP-trapping assay. PC-3M-luc-C6 cells were approximately 12- to 20-fold more sensitive to PARP inhibition than other prostate tumor lines, suggesting that these cells bear a DNA damage repair defect. The tissue exposure and efficacy of these PARP inhibitors were evaluated in vivo in PC-3M-luc-C6 subcutaneous and bone metastasis tumor models. A steady-state pharmacokinetic study in PC-3M-luc-C6 tumor-bearing mice showed that all of the PARP inhibitors had favorable subcutaneous tumor exposure, but niraparib was differentiated by superior bone marrow exposure compared with the other drugs. In a PC-3M-luc-C6 subcutaneous tumor efficacy study, niraparib, olaparib, and talazoparib inhibited tumor growth and increased survival to a similar degree. In contrast, in the PC-3M-luc-C6 bone metastasis model, niraparib showed the most potent inhibition of bone tumor growth compared with the other therapies (67% vs. 40%-45% on day 17), and the best survival improvement over vehicle control [hazard ratio (HR), 0.28 vs. HR, 0.46-0.59] and over other therapies (HR, 1.68-2.16). These results show that niraparib has superior bone marrow exposure and greater inhibition of tumor growth in bone, compared with olaparib, rucaparib, and talazoparib.

Prediction of the drug-drug interaction potential of the α1-acid glycoprotein bound, CYP3A4/CYP2C9 metabolized oncology drug, erdafitinib.

Erdafitinib is a potent oral pan-fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitor being developed as oncology drug for patients with alterations in the fibroblast growth factor receptor pathway. Erdafitinib binds preferentially to α1-acid glycoprotein (AGP) and is primarily metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9 and 3A4. This article describes a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for erdafitinib to assess the drug-drug interaction (DDI) potential of CYP3A4 and CYP2C9 inhibitors and CYP3A4/CYP2C9 inducers on erdafitinib pharmacokinetics (PK) in patients with cancer exhibiting higher AGP levels and in populations with different CYP2C9 genotypes. Erdafitinib's DDI potential as a perpetrator for transporter inhibition and for time-dependent inhibition and/or induction of CYP3A was also evaluated. The PBPK model incorporated input parameters from various in vitro and clinical PK studies, and the model was verified using a clinical DDI study with itraconazole and fluconazole. Erdafitinib clearance in the PBPK model consisted of multiple pathways (CYP2C9/3A4, renal, intestinal; additional hepatic clearance), making the compound less susceptible to DDIs. In poor-metabolizing CYP2C9 populations carrying the CYP2C9*3/*3 genotype, simulations shown clinically relevant increase in erdafitinib plasma concentrations. Simulated luminal and enterocyte concentration showed potential risk of P-glycoprotein inhibition with erdafitinib in the first 5 h after dosing, and simulations showed this interaction can be avoided by staggering erdafitinib and digoxin dosing. Other than a simulated ~ 60% exposure reduction with strong CYP3A/2C inducers such as rifampicin, other DDI liabilities were minimal and considered not clinically relevant.

Niraparib with androgen receptor-axis-targeted therapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: safety and pharmacokinetic results from a phase 1b study (BEDIVERE).

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and pharmacokinetics and determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of niraparib with apalutamide or abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). METHODS: BEDIVERE was a multicenter, open-label, phase 1b study of niraparib 200 or 300 mg/day with apalutamide 240 mg or AAP (abiraterone acetate 1000 mg; prednisone 10 mg). Patients with mCRPC were previously treated with ≥ 2 lines of systemic therapy, including ≥ 1 androgen receptor-axis-targeted therapy for prostate cancer. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were enrolled (niraparib-apalutamide, 6; niraparib-AAP, 27). No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were reported when combinations included niraparib 200 mg; five patients receiving niraparib 300 mg experienced DLTs [niraparib-apalutamide, 2/3 patients (66.7%); niraparib-AAP, 3/8 patients (37.5%)]. Although data are limited, niraparib exposures were lower when given with apalutamide compared with historical niraparib monotherapy exposures in patients with solid tumors. Because of the higher incidence of DLTs, the niraparib-apalutamide combination and niraparib 300 mg combination with AAP were not further evaluated. Niraparib 200 mg was selected as the RP2D with AAP. Of 19 patients receiving niraparib 200 mg with AAP, 12 (63.2%) had grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events, the most common being thrombocytopenia (26.3%) and hypertension (21.1%). Five patients (26.3%) had adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the choice of niraparib 200 mg as the RP2D with AAP. The niraparib-AAP combination was tolerable in patients with mCRPC, with no new safety signals. An ongoing phase 3 study is further assessing this combination in patients with mCRPC. TRIAL REGISTRATION NO: NCT02924766 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Metabolism and disposition in rats, dogs, and humans of erdafitinib, an orally administered potent pan-fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

This article describes in vivo biotransformation and disposition of erdafitinib following single oral dose of 3H-erdafitinib and 14C-erdafitinib to intact and bile duct-cannulated (BC) rats (4 mg/kg), 3H-erdafitinib to intact dogs (0.25 mg/kg), and 14C-erdafitinib to humans (12 mg; NCT02692677). Peak plasma concentrations of total radioactivity were achieved rapidly (Tmax: animals, 1 h; humans, 2-3 h). Recovery of drug-derived radioactivity was significantly slower in humans (87%, 384 h) versus animals (rats: 91-98%, 48 h; dogs: 81%, 72 h). Faeces was the primary route of elimination in intact rats (95%), dogs (76%), and humans (69%); and bile in BC rats (48%). Renal elimination of radioactivity was relatively low in animals (2-12%) versus humans (19%). Unchanged erdafitinib was major component in human excreta (faeces, 17%; urine, 11%) relative to animals. M6 (O-desmethyl) was the major faecal metabolite in humans (24%) and rats (intact, 46%; BC, 11%), and M2 (O-glucuronide of M6) was the prevalent biliary metabolite in rats (14%). In dogs, besides M6, majority of radioactive dose in faeces was composed of multiple minor metabolites. In humans, unchanged erdafitinib was the major circulating entity. O-demethylation of erdafitinib was the major metabolic pathway in humans and animals.

Effect of Fluconazole and Itraconazole on the Pharmacokinetics of Erdafitinib in Healthy Adults: A Randomized, Open-Label, Drug-Drug Interaction Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Erdafitinib, an oral selective pan-fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) kinase inhibitor, is primarily metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9 and 3A4. The aim of this phase 1 study was to assess the pharmacokinetics and safety of erdafitinib in healthy participants when coadministered with fluconazole (moderate CYP2C9 and CYP3A inhibitor), and itraconazole (a strong CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein inhibitor). The effect of CYP2C9 genotype variants (*1/*1, *1/*2, *1/*3) on the pharmacokinetics of erdafitinib was also investigated. METHODS: In this open-label, parallel-group, single-center study, eligible healthy adults were randomized by CYP2C9 genotype to receive Treatment A (single oral dose of erdafitinib 4 mg) on day 1, Treatment B (fluconazole 400 mg/day orally) on days 1-11, or Treatment C (itraconazole 200 mg/day orally) on days 1-11. Healthy adults randomized to Treatment B and C received a single oral 4-mg dose of erdafitinib on day 5. The pharmacokinetic parameters, including mean maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the curve (AUC) from time 0 to 168 h (AUC168h), AUC from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast), and AUC from time 0 to infinity (AUC∞) were calculated from individual plasma concentration-time data using standard non-compartmental methods. RESULTS: Coadministration of erdafitinib with fluconazole increased Cmax of erdafitinib by approximately 21%, AUC168h by 38%, AUClast by 49%, and AUC∞ by 48% while coadministration with itraconazole resulted in no change in erdafitinib Cmax and increased AUC168h by 20%, AUClast by 33% and AUC∞ by 34%. Erdafitinib exposure was comparable between participants with CYP2C9 *1/*2 or *1/*3 and with wild-type CYP2C9 genotype. The ratio of total amount of erdafitinib excreted in the urine (inhibited to non-inhibited) was 1.09, the ratio of total amount of excreted metabolite M6 was 1.21, and the ratio of the metabolite to parent ratio in the urine was 1.11, when coadministration of erdafitinib with itraconazole was compared with single-dose erdafitinib. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were generally Grade 1 or 2 in severity; the most commonly reported TEAE was headache. No safety concerns were identified with single-dose erdafitinib when administered alone and in combination with fluconazole or itraconazole in healthy adults. CONCLUSION: Coadministration of fluconazole or itraconazole or other moderate/strong CYP2C9 or CYP3A4 inhibitors may increase exposure to erdafitinib in healthy adults and thus may warrant erdafitinib dose reduction or use of alternative concomitant medications with no or minimal CYP2C9 or CYP3A4 inhibition potential. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier number: NCT03135106.

Renal tubular and adrenal medullary tumors in the 2-year rat study with canagliflozin confirmed to be secondary to carbohydrate (glucose) malabsorption in the 15-month mechanistic rat study.

During preclinical development of canagliflozin, an SGLT2 inhibitor, treatment-related pheochromocytomas, renal tubular tumors (RTT), and testicular Leydig cell tumors were reported in the 2-year rat toxicology study. In a previous 6-month rat mechanistic study, feeding a glucose free diet prevented canagliflozin effects on carbohydrate malabsorption as well as the increase in cell proliferation in adrenal medulla and kidneys, implicating carbohydrate malabsorption as the mechanism for tumor formation. In this chronic study male Sprague-Dawley rats were dosed orally with canagliflozin at high dose-levels (65 or 100 mg/kg/day) for 15 months and received either a standard diet or a glucose-free diet. Canagliflozin-dosed rats on standard diet showed presence of basophilic renal tubular tumors (6/90) and an increased incidence of adrenal medullary hyperplasia (35/90), which was fully prevented by feeding a glucose-free diet (no RTT's; adrenal medullary hyperplasia in ≤5/90). These data further confirm that kidney and adrenal medullary tumors in the 2-year rat study were secondary to carbohydrate (glucose) malabsorption and were not due to a direct effect of canagliflozin on these target tissues.

In vitro and physiologically-based pharmacokinetic based assessment of drug-drug interaction potential of canagliflozin.

AIMS: Canagliflozin is a recently approved drug for use in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. The potential for canagliflozin to cause clinical drug-drug interactions (DDIs) was assessed. METHODS: DDI potential of canagliflozin was investigated using in vitro test systems containing drug metabolizing enzymes or transporters. Basic predictive approaches were applied to determine potential interactions in vivo. A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was developed and clinical DDI simulations were performed to determine the likelihood of cytochrome P450 (CYP) inhibition by canagliflozin. RESULTS: Canagliflozin was primarily metabolized by uridine 5'-diphospho-glucuronosyltransferase 1A9 and 2B4 enzymes. Canagliflozin was a substrate of efflux transporters (P-glycoprotein, breast cancer resistance protein and multidrug resistance-associated protein-2) but was not a substrate of uptake transporters (organic anion transporter polypeptide isoforms OATP1B1, OATP1B3, organic anion transporters OAT1 and OAT3, and organic cationic transporters OCT1, and OCT2). In inhibition assays, canagliflozin was shown to be a weak in vitro inhibitor (IC50 ) of CYP3A4 (27 µmol l -1 , standard error [SE] 4.9), CYP2C9 (80 µmol l -1 , SE 8.1), CYP2B6 (16 µmol l-1 , SE 2.1), CYP2C8 (75 µmol l -1 , SE 6.4), P-glycoprotein (19.3 µmol l -1 , SE 7.2), and multidrug resistance-associated protein-2 (21.5 µmol l -1 , SE 3.1). Basic models recommended in DDI guidelines (US Food & Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency) predicted moderate to low likelihood of interaction for these CYPs and efflux transporters. PBPK DDI simulations of canagliflozin with CYP probe substrates (simvastatin, S-warfarin, bupropion, repaglinide) did not show relevant interaction in humans since mean areas under the concentration-time curve and maximum plasma concentration ratios for probe substrates with and without canagliflozin and its 95% CIs were within 0.80-1.25. CONCLUSIONS: In vitro DDI followed by a predictive or PBPK approach was applied to determine DDI potential of canagliflozin. Overall, canagliflozin is neither a perpetrator nor a victim of clinically important interactions.

In vitro metabolism of canagliflozin in human liver, kidney, intestine microsomes, and recombinant uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferases (UGT) and the effect of genetic variability of UGT enzymes on the pharmacokinetics of canagliflozin in humans.

O-glucuronidation is the major metabolic elimination pathway for canagliflozin. The objective was to identify enzymes and tissues involved in the formation of 2 major glucuronidated metabolites (M7 and M5) of canagliflozin and subsequently to assess the impact of genetic variations in these uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) on in vivo pharmacokinetics in humans. In vitro incubations with recombinant UGTs revealed involvement of UGT1A9 and UGT2B4 in the formation of M7 and M5, respectively. Although M7 and M5 were formed in liver microsomes, only M7 was formed in kidney microsomes. Participants from 7 phase 1 studies were pooled for pharmacogenomic analyses. A total of 134 participants (mean age, 41 years; men, 63%; white, 84%) were included in the analysis. In UGT1A9*3 carriers, exposure of plasma canagliflozin (Cmax,ss , 11%; AUCτ,ss , 45%) increased relative to the wild type. An increase in exposure of plasma canagliflozin (Cmax,ss , 21%; AUCt,ss , 18%) was observed in participants with UGT2B4*2 genotype compared with UGT2B4*2 noncarriers. Metabolites further delineate the role of both enzymes. The pharmacokinetic findings in participants carrying the UGT1A9*3 and UGT2B4*2 allele implicate that UGT1A9 and UGT2B4 are involved in the metabolism of canagliflozin to M7 and M5, respectively.

Absolute oral bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of canagliflozin: A microdose study in healthy participants.

Absolute oral bioavailability of canagliflozin was assessed by simultaneous oral administration with intravenous [(14) C]-canagliflozin microdose infusion in nine healthy men. Pharmacokinetics of canagliflozin, [(14) C]-canagliflozin, and total radioactivity, and safety and tolerability were assessed at prespecified timepoints. On day 1, single-dose oral canagliflozin (300 mg) followed 105 minutes later by intravenous [(14) C]-canagliflozin (10 µg, 200 nCi) was administered. After oral administration, the mean (SD) Cmax of canagliflozin was 2504 (482) ng/mL at 1.5 hours, AUC∞ 17,375 (3555) ng.h/mL, and t1/2 11.6 (0.70) hours. After intravenous administration, the mean (SD) Cmax of unchanged [(14) C]-canagliflozin was 17,605 (6901) ng/mL, AUC∞ 27,100 (10,778) ng.h/mL, Vdss 83.5 (29.2) L, Vdz 119 (41.6) L, and CL 12.2 (3.79) L/h. Unchanged [(14) C]-canagliflozin and metabolites accounted for about 57% and 43% of the plasma total [(14) C] radioactivity AUC∞ , respectively. For total [(14) C] radioactivity, the mean (SD) Cmax was 15,981 (2721) ng-eq/mL, and AUC∞ 53,755 (15,587) ng-eq.h/mL. Renal (34.5% in urine) and biliary (34.1% in feces) excretions were the major elimination pathways for total [(14) C] radioactivity. The absolute oral bioavailability of canagliflozin was 65% (90% confidence interval: 55.41; 76.07). Overall, oral canagliflozin 300 mg coadministered with intravenous [(14) C]-canagliflozin (10 µg) was generally well-tolerated in healthy men, with no treatment-emergent adverse events.

Effect of canagliflozin on the pharmacokinetics of glyburide, metformin, and simvastatin in healthy participants.

Drug-drug interactions between canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, and glyburide, metformin, and simvastatin were evaluated in three phase-1 studies in healthy participants. In these open-label, fixed sequence studies, participants received: Study 1-glyburide 1.25 mg/day (Day 1), canagliflozin 200 mg/day (Days 4-8), canagliflozin with glyburide (Day 9); Study 2-metformin 2,000 mg/day (Day 1), canagliflozin 300 mg/day (Days 4-7), metformin with canagliflozin (Day 8); Study 3-simvastatin 40 mg/day (Day 1), canagliflozin 300 mg/day (Days 2-6), simvastatin with canagliflozin (Day 7). Pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed at prespecified intervals. Co-administration of canagliflozin and glyburide did not affect the overall exposure (maximum plasma concentration [Cmax ] and area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC]) of glyburide and its metabolites (4-trans-hydroxy-glyburide and 3-cis-hydroxy-glyburide). Canagliflozin did not affect the peak concentration of metformin; however, AUC increased by 20%. Though Cmax and AUC were slightly increased for simvastatin (9% and 12%) and simvastatin acid (26% and 18%) following coadministration with canagliflozin, compared with simvastatin administration alone; however, no effect on active 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitory activity was observed. There were no serious adverse events or hypoglycemic episodes. No drug-drug interactions were observed between canagliflozin and glyburide, metformin, or simvastatin. All treatments were well-tolerated in healthy participants.

Effects of rifampin, cyclosporine A, and probenecid on the pharmacokinetic profile of canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, in healthy participants.

OBJECTIVE: Canagliflozin, a sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, approved for the treatment of type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), is metabolized by uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferases (UGT) 1A9 and UGT2B4, and is a substrate of P-glycoprotein (P-gp). Canagliflozin exposures may be affected by coadministration of drugs that induce (e.g., rifampin for UGT) or inhibit (e.g. probenecid for UGT; cyclosporine A for P-gp) these pathways. The primary objective of these three independent studies (single-center, open-label, fixed-sequence) was to evaluate the effects of rifampin (study 1), probenecid (study 2), and cyclosporine A (study 3) on the pharmacokinetics of canagliflozin in healthy participants. METHODS: Participants received; in study 1: canagliflozin 300 mg (days 1 and 10), rifampin 600 mg (days 4-12); study 2: canagliflozin 300 mg (days 1-17), probenecid 500 mg twice daily (days 15-17); and study 3: canagliflozin 300 mg (days 1-8), cyclosporine A 400 mg (day 8). Pharmacokinetics were assessed at prespecified intervals on days 1 and 10 (study 1); on days 14 and 17 (study 2), and on days 2-8 (study 3). RESULTS: Rifampin decreased the maximum plasma canagliflozin concentration (Cmax) by 28% and its area under the curve (AUC) by 51%. Probenecid increased the Cmax by 13% and the AUC by 21%. Cyclosporine A increased the AUC by 23% but did not affect the Cmax. CONCLUSION: Coadministration of canagliflozin with rifampin, probenecid, and cyclosporine A was well-tolerated. No clinically meaningful interactions were observed for probenecid or cyclosporine A, while rifampin coadministration modestly reduced canagliflozin plasma concentrations and could necessitate an appropriate monitoring of glycemic control.

Successful integration of nonclinical and clinical findings in interpreting the clinical relevance of rodent neoplasia with a new chemical entity.

Canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, has been developed for the treatment of adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). During the phase 3 program, treatment-related pheochromocytomas, renal tubular tumors, and testicular Leydig cell tumors were reported in the 2-year rat toxicology study. Treatment-related tumors were not seen in the 2-year mouse study. A cross-functional, mechanism-based approach was undertaken to determine whether the mechanisms responsible for tumorigenesis in the rat were of relevance to humans. Based on findings from nonclinical and clinical studies, the treatment-related tumors observed in rats were not deemed to be of clinical relevance. Here, we describe the scientific and regulatory journey from learning of the 2-year rat study findings to the approval of canagliflozin for the treatment of T2DM.

Effect of canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, on the pharmacokinetics of oral contraceptives, warfarin, and digoxin in healthy participants.

OBJECTIVE: Drug-drug interactions between canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor approved for the management of type-2 diabetes mellitus, and an oral contraceptive (OC), warfarin, and digoxin were evaluated in three phase 1 studies in healthy participants. METHODS: All studies were open-label; study 1 included a fixed-sequence design, and studies 2 and 3 used a crossover design. Regimens were: study 1: OC (levonorgestrel (150 µg) + ethinyl estradiol (30 µg))/day (day 1), canagliflozin 200 mg/day (days 4 - 8), and canagliflozin with OC (day 9); study 2: canagliflozin 300 mg/day (days 1 - 12) with warfarin 30 mg/day (day 6) in period 1, and only warfarin 30 mg/day (day 1) in period 2, or vice versa; study 3: digoxin alone (0.5 mg/day (day 1) + 0.25 mg/day (days 2 - 7)) in period 1, and with canagliflozin 300 mg/day (days 1 - 7) in period 2, or vice versa. Pharmacokinetics (PK) were assessed at prespecified intervals; OC: days 1 and 9, canagliflozin: days 8 - 9 (study 1); warfarin: days 6 (period 1) and 1 (period 2) (study 2); and digoxin: days 5 - 7 (periods 1 and 2) (study 3). Warfarin's pharmacodynamics (PD; International Normalized Ratio (INR)) was assessed on days 6 (period 1) and 1 (period 2). RESULTS: Canagliflozin increased the plasma exposure of OC (maximum plasma concentration (Cmax): 22%, area under the curve (AUC): 6%) and digoxin (Cmax: 36%, AUC: 20%); but did not alter warfarin'€™s PK and PD. No clinically relevant safety findings (including hypoglycemia) were noted. CONCLUSION: Canagliflozin can be coadministered with OC, warfarin, or digoxin without dose adjustments. All treatments were well-tolerated.

Carcinogenicity in rats of the SGLT2 inhibitor canagliflozin.

The carcinogenicity potential of canagliflozin, an inhibitor of SGLT2, was evaluated in a 2-year rat study (10, 30, and 100 mg/kg). Rats showed an increase in pheochromocytomas, renal tubular tumors, and testicular Leydig cell tumors. Systemic exposure multiples at the highest dose relative to the maximum clinical dose were 12- to 21-fold. Pheochromocytomas and renal tubular tumors were noted in both sexes at 100 mg/kg. Leydig cell tumors were observed in males in all dose groups and were associated with increased luteinizing hormone levels. Hyperplasia was increased in the adrenal medulla at 100 mg/kg, but only a limited increase in simple tubular hyperplasia was observed in the kidney of males at 100 mg/kg. Hyperostosis occurred and was accompanied by substantial effects on calcium metabolism, including increased urinary calcium excretion and decreased levels of calcium regulating hormones (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D and parathyroid hormone). A separate study with radiolabeled calcium confirmed that increased urinary calcium excretion was mediated via increased calcium absorption from the gastrointestinal tract. It was hypothesized that, at high doses, canagliflozin might have inhibited glucose absorption in the intestine via SGLT1 inhibition that resulted in glucose malabsorption, which increased calcium absorption by stimulating colonic glucose fermentation and reducing intestinal pH. Pheochromocytomas and adrenal medullary hyperplasia were attributed to altered calcium homeostasis, which have a known relationship in the rat. In conclusion, Leydig cell tumors were associated with increased luteinizing hormone levels and pheochromocytomas were most likely related to glucose malabsorption and altered calcium homeostasis. Renal tubular tumors may also have been linked to glucose malabsorption.

Carbohydrate malabsorption mechanism for tumor formation in rats treated with the SGLT2 inhibitor canagliflozin.

Canagliflozin is an SGLT2 inhibitor used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Studies were conducted to investigate the mechanism responsible for renal tubular tumors and pheochromocytomas observed at the high dose in a 2-year carcinogenicity study in rats. At the high dose (100mg/kg) in rats, canagliflozin caused carbohydrate malabsorption evidenced by inhibition of intestinal glucose uptake, decreased intestinal pH and increased urinary calcium excretion. In a 6-month mechanistic study utilization of a glucose-free diet prevented carbohydrate malabsorption and its sequelae, including increased calcium absorption and urinary calcium excretion, and hyperostosis. Cell proliferation in the kidney and adrenal medulla was increased in rats maintained on standard diet and administered canagliflozin (100mg/kg), and in addition an increase in the renal injury biomarker KIM-1 was observed. Increased cell proliferation is considered as a proximal event in carcinogenesis. Effects on cell proliferation, KIM-1 and calcium excretion were inhibited in rats maintained on the glucose-free diet, indicating they are secondary to carbohydrate malabsorption and are not direct effects of canagliflozin.

Metabolism and excretion of canagliflozin in mice, rats, dogs, and humans.

Canagliflozin is an oral antihyperglycemic agent used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. It blocks the reabsorption of glucose in the proximal renal tubule by inhibiting the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2. This article describes the in vivo biotransformation and disposition of canagliflozin after a single oral dose of [(14)C]canagliflozin to intact and bile duct-cannulated (BDC) mice and rats and to intact dogs and humans. Fecal excretion was the primary route of elimination of drug-derived radioactivity in both animals and humans. In BDC mice and rats, most radioactivity was excreted in bile. The extent of radioactivity excreted in urine as a percentage of the administered [(14)C]canagliflozin dose was 1.2%-7.6% in animals and approximately 33% in humans. The primary pathways contributing to the metabolic clearance of canagliflozin were oxidation in animals and direct glucuronidation of canagliflozin in humans. Unchanged canagliflozin was the major component in systemic circulation in all species. In human plasma, two pharmacologically inactive O-glucuronide conjugates of canagliflozin, M5 and M7, represented 19% and 14% of total drug-related exposure and were considered major human metabolites. Plasma concentrations of M5 and M7 in mice and rats from repeated dose safety studies were lower than those in humans given canagliflozin at the maximum recommended dose of 300 mg. However, biliary metabolite profiling in rodents indicated that mouse and rat livers had significant exposure to M5 and M7. Pharmacologic inactivity and high water solubility of M5 and M7 support glucuronidation of canagliflozin as a safe detoxification pathway.

LC-ESI-MS/MS quantification of 4ß-hydroxycholesterol and cholesterol in plasma samples of limited volume.

A liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS/MS) assay was developed and qualified for analyzing 4ß-hydroxycholesterol and cholesterol in 5 µl of human and mouse plasma. Stable isotope-labeled d7-analogs of both analytes were used as internal standards and 4.2% (w/v) human serum albumin in phosphate-buffered saline was used as the surrogate matrix for preparation of calibration curves and QCs. The assay is capable of quantification of 4ß-hydroxycholesterol and cholesterol from 5 to 500 ng/ml and 50 to 2000 µg/ml, respectively, with acceptable accuracy and precision following evaluation of recovery of analytes, autosampler stability and potential contribution of chemical oxidation to the formation of 4ß-hydroxycholesterol. The final reconstituted solution was diluted for quantification of cholesterol typically present at 1000 fold higher concentration than 4ß-hydroxycholesterol in the same samples used for 4ß-hydroxycholesterol quantification. The successful quantification using a low plasma volume was achieved by quantification of total forms (free and conjugated) of both analytes after alkaline hydrolysis, followed by derivatization to form electrospray ionization-sensitive picolinyl esters, which upon collision-induced dissociation gave high mass precursor-product ion pair for selective detection by multiple reaction monitoring. In addition, chromatographic separation using a 16-min reversed phase gradient elution on a 1.9 µm particle size, C18 column, overcame interference from other isobaric plasma oxysterols during detection by multiple-reaction monitoring. This assay was compared to an orthogonal enzymatic assay for cholesterol and all samples, but one, provided values that were within 10% of each other. In addition, this assay passed the incurred sample tests for both analytes in human and mouse plasma samples according to reported acceptance criteria for incurred sample reanalysis. The quantification of both analytes permitted the determination of 4ß-hydroxycholesterol compared to its ratio to cholesterol as an endogenous biomarker for CYP3A4/5 activity. The LC-ESI-MS/MS assay was also successfully applied to quantification of 4ß-hydroxycholesterol and cholesterol in plasma samples from untreated human and mice including FRG™ KO C57Bl/6 chimeric mice with humanized livers. The preliminary data indicated that the plasma 4ß-hydroxycholesterol concentrations or their ratio to cholesterol from mice including chimeric mice were higher than those from human.

De-risking bio-therapeutics for possible drug interactions using cryopreserved human hepatocytes.

Inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis are characterized by increases in circulating cytokines, which play an important role in modulation of the disease state. Several marketed bio-therapeutics target cytokines and act as effective treatment strategies. Previous in-vitro and in-vivo studies have suggested that cytokines may have both direct and indirect effects on drug metabolizing enzyme levels in the liver. Few studies have characterized models to evaluate the risk of potential drug interactions that might be mediated by changes in cytokine levels. In the present studies the potential of three cytokines (IL-2, IL-6 and TNF-α) to modulate gene expression and activity of the major human cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes (CYP1A2, 2B6, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, and 3A4) in cryopreserved human hepatocytes (CHH) was investigated. Significant decreases in the activity of all 6 CYP isoforms occurred in hepatocytes incubated with TNF-α or IL-6 (17-85%; and 22-76% of untreated control values, respectively). TNF-α down-regulated the gene expression of CYP1A2, 2D6 and 3A4 only, whereas IL-6 down-regulated gene expression of all of the tested CYP isoforms except 2D6. IL-2 had only mild effects on CYP activity and mRNA levels of examined isoforms. In CHH exposed to TNF-α, changes in CYP activity were not always paralleled by gene expression alterations for three of the examined CYP isoforms. These studies highlight several potential pitfalls in using isolated human hepatocytes for determination of drug interactions by bio-therapeutics including lack of correlation of mRNA and activity measurements for some CYP isoforms when using single time point determinations, and appropriateness of the model for indirect acting cytokine and cytokine modulators.

Pharmacokinetics, efficacy and toxicity of different pegylated liposomal doxorubicin formulations in preclinical models: is a conventional bioequivalence approach sufficient to ensure therapeutic equivalence of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin products?

PURPOSE: To examine whether a conventional bioequivalence approach is sufficient to ensure the therapeutic equivalence of liposomal products, the pharmacokinetics, efficacy and toxicity of different formulation variants of the marketed Doxil(/Caelyx product, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), were evaluated in several preclinical models. METHODS: Six different variants of the marketed PLD formulation were prepared by incorporating minor changes in the composition and liposome size of the original formulation. The pharmacokinetics of 5 formulations were evaluated in albino mice following i.v. administration at 6 mg/kg. Selected variants along with Doxil/Caelyx (formulation 1, Doxil-control) were tested for antitumor activity in the MDA-MB-231 xenograft mouse model following 3 repeated administrations at 2 mg/kg or 3 mg/kg (once weekly for 3 weeks) and/or toxicity in Cynomolgus monkeys following 6 repeated administrations at 2.5 or 4.0 mg/kg. Formulations 1-4 were tested for antitumor activity and formulations 1, 2, 6 and 7 were evaluated in a monkey toxicity study. The toxicokinetics of total doxorubicin was determined after the first and last dose in the monkey toxicity study. RESULTS: In the albino mouse, formulations 2 and 3 had plasma pharmacokinetic profiles similar to Doxil-control (formulation 1). Although these three formulations had similar pharmacokinetic profiles, formulation 2 showed significantly (P < 0.05) longer survival time and better efficacy (reduced tumor volume) over other formulations tested for antitumor activity at the 3 mg/kg dose. In monkeys, formulation 2 gave systemic exposure of doxorubicin approximately the same as formulation 1; however, multi-focal degeneration of renal cortical tubules and hypocellularity of the bone marrow were observed with formulation 2 but not with formulation 1 (Doxil-control). Formulations 6 and 7 gave lower exposure to doxorubicin compared to Doxil-control, but were associated with higher severity and frequency of toxic effects (hematological effects, elevated liver enzymes). It was concluded that plasma pharmacokinetics and systemic exposure of doxorubicin did not correlate well with the antitumor activity and toxicity profiles for PLD products. Hence, a conventional bioequivalence approach is not appropriate for establishing therapeutic equivalence of generic PLD products. A carefully designed clinical study evaluating clinical safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics should be considered for establishing the therapeutic equivalency of generic versions of Doxil.