Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Immunotherapy ; 15(14): 1143-1155, 2023 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37589164

ABSTRACT

Background: The infliximab biosimilar CT-P13 was approved in Thailand in 2015. Methods: This open-label, multicenter, post-marketing surveillance study evaluated the safety (events of special interest [ESIs]; primary end point) and effectiveness of 46 weeks of CT-P13 treatment according to routine practice in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), or psoriatic arthritis (PsA), with 1 year follow-up post-treatment. Results: 30 patients were enrolled (16 RA, 8 AS and 6 PsA). Infections were the most frequently reported study drug-related ESIs (2 RA and 2 AS). One patient with RA and one with PsA experienced infusion-related reactions. No cases of tuberculosis, malignancy (as expected, given 1 year follow-up), or drug-induced liver disease were reported. Disease activity improved across indications. Conclusion: CT-P13 was well tolerated and effective across indications.


Infliximab is one biological medicine used to treat inflammatory diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). CT-P13 is a near-identical copy, called a biosimilar, of the original ('reference') version of infliximab. CT-P13 is the first biosimilar to receive regulatory approval for treatment of the same three diseases from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and US Food and Drug Administration. Biosimilarity means that CT-P13 does not differ from the original version of infliximab in clinically important ways, such as how safe it is and how well it works. CT-P13 and reference infliximab provided similar symptom relief during previous clinical trials, and both drugs caused similar side effects. It is important to monitor the safety and performance of CT-P13 when given during routine clinical practice, and in different ethnic populations, such as through the study reported here. Following regulatory approval in Thailand, 30 patients prescribed CT-P13 during routine clinical practice participated in this study. The study included 16 patients with RA, eight with AS and six with PsA. The patients took CT-P13 for 46 weeks and were monitored for a further year. Side effects of CT-P13 were as expected based on previous experience and did not raise any safety concerns. Based on the known safety profile of CT-P13, the study looked at some side effects in particular: infections were the most common of these side effects, experienced by 16 patients overall (seven patients with RA, five patients with AS and four patients with PsA). CT-P13 improved symptoms for all of the diseases. The study suggests that CT-P13 can be given safely and reduces symptoms in Thai patients with AS, RA or PsA. Thai Clinical Trials Registry: TCTR20170817005 (www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/show/TCTR20170817005).


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Psoriatic , Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Spondylitis, Ankylosing , Humans , Arthritis, Psoriatic/drug therapy , Thailand , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Spondylitis, Ankylosing/drug therapy , Product Surveillance, Postmarketing
2.
Clin Rheumatol ; 41(1): 213-221, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34406530

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Currently available guidelines on urate-lowering therapy (ULT) initiation in acute gout flare are conflicting. We compared the time to complete resolution of acute gout flare between early and late allopurinol initiation. METHODS: This 28-day, randomized controlled, open-label trial included patients with crystal-proven gout who were presented with acute gout flare within 72 h of arthritis onset. Exclusion criteria were advanced renal failure, ongoing ULT, and presence of the HLA-B*5801 allele. Allopurinol was used on days 1 and 14 in early and late groups, respectively. Primary outcome was time to complete arthritis resolution, and secondary outcomes were time to clinical resolution; arthritis relapse; laboratory parameters; and adverse events. RESULTS: One hundred seventeen patients were randomized to early and late allopurinol groups (n = 59 and 58, respectively). One patient in each group was lost to follow-up; therefore, 115 patients were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. The median time to complete resolution was not significantly different between the early and late allopurinol groups (6 [5-14] and 6 [5-7] days, respectively; p = 0.14). The median time to clinical resolution was 4 [3-6] days in both groups (p = 0.12). Other secondary outcomes were not significantly different. Serious adverse events did not occur in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Early allopurinol initiation during an acute gout flare did not lead to significant changes in time to resolution, flare recurrence, and inflammatory markers. Key Points • Allopurinol Initiation in Gout.


Subject(s)
Allopurinol , Gout Suppressants , Gout , Time-to-Treatment , Allopurinol/therapeutic use , Double-Blind Method , Gout/drug therapy , Gout Suppressants/therapeutic use , Humans , Symptom Flare Up , Treatment Outcome , Uric Acid
3.
Int J Rheum Dis ; 20(9): 1166-1184, 2017 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28730640

ABSTRACT

AIM: In June 2015, the Thai Rheumatism Association (TRA) approved an update of its recommendation for the use of biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and targeted synthetic (tsDMARD) in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) to cover those currently available in Thailand (etanercept, infliximab, golimumab, rituximab, tocilizumab, abatacept and tofacitinib). METHOD: A search of the literature was performed between January 2000 and June 2015. Existing RA recommendations, in relation to the use of bDMARDs and tsDMARD, were identified and evaluated by the AGREE II instrument prior to their use as a 'guide' for developing this TRA recommendation. An additional literature search was performed in order to answer specific clinical questions that could not be found in existing guidelines. RESULT: Thirteen recommendations were developed. They covered the use of RA classification criteria, the aim of RA treatment, when to initiate bDMARDs/tsDMARD or taper or switch them to other medications, as well as monitoring these drugs during their use. In addition, specific issues including their use and vaccination, malignancies, pregnancy and lactation, and perioperative period also were addressed. Public hearings were performed at the annual meeting of the TRA and of the Royal College of Physicians of Thailand. The recommendations were distributed to other professional associations related to RA management, as well as government sectors associated with the reimbursement policy, prior to development of the final version. CONCLUSION: These recommendations will help Thai rheumatologists prescribe bDMARDs and tsDMARD more appropriately when treating RA patients.


Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Evidence-Based Medicine/standards , Rheumatology/standards , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/diagnosis , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/immunology , Biological Products/adverse effects , Clinical Decision-Making , Consensus , Humans , Predictive Value of Tests , Thailand , Treatment Outcome
4.
J Rheumatol ; 40(11): 1806-11, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23996293

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Hypertension (HTN), a common modifiable cardiovascular risk factor, is more common in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but the underlying mechanisms are unclear. We examined the hypothesis that mediators of inflammation and markers of cardiovascular risk are associated with HTN in RA. METHODS: We compared measures of inflammation [serum C-reactive protein (CRP), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin 6 (IL-6), homocysteine, and leptin concentrations] and insulin resistance [homeostasis model assessment index (HOMA)] in RA patients with (n = 90) and without HTN (n = 79). HTN was defined as blood pressure ≥ 140/90 mm Hg or treatment with antihypertensive therapy. The independent association of markers of interest with HTN was examined using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Patients with HTN were significantly older and had longer disease duration than those without HTN (both p < 0.001). Concentrations of homocysteine [11.1 (8.5-13.5) µmol/l vs 9.3 (7.8-11.0) µmol/l] were significantly higher in patients with HTN (p < 0.001). After adjustment for age, sex, race, smoking, body mass index, and corticosteroid and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID) use, increased concentrations of homocysteine (OR 2.9, 95% CI: 1.5-5.5, p = 0.001), and leptin (OR 2.0, 95% CI: 1.0-3.8, p = 0.046) were significantly associated with HTN, but the 28-joint Disease Activity Score, IL-6, CRP, TNF-α, and HOMA index were not (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: HTN in patients with RA is not associated with generalized systemic inflammation or insulin resistance, but is associated with increasing concentrations of homocysteine and leptin. The pathogenesis of HTN in RA may involve pathways more regularly associated with fat and vascular homeostasis.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid/complications , Hypertension/complications , Inflammation/complications , Adult , Aged , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/blood , Biomarkers/blood , C-Reactive Protein/metabolism , Female , Humans , Hypertension/blood , Inflammation/blood , Insulin Resistance/physiology , Interleukin-6/blood , Leptin/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/blood
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...